BCU initiates resolution of the issue of visits by advocates to convicted persons

Advocacy
12:32 Wed 07.05.25 75 Reviews
Print

Article 110 of the Criminal Enforcement Code guarantees convicted persons confidentiality of meetings with their advocate. One of the important elements is the possibility to communicate with an advocate in a room without a solid partition. In practice, this provision of the law is systematically violated.

The existing problem was examined by the Bar Council of Ukraine during its meeting on May 6.

The reason for the meeting was an appeal by advocate Yevgenia Shara, who reported that on April 17, on behalf of the Northern Interregional Center for the Provision of Free Legal Aid, she arrived at Zhytomyr Penal Colony No. 4 to conduct a confidential meeting with a convict.

She provided all the necessary documents, including a copy of the power of attorney and her lawyer's certificate, and requested in writing that the meeting be held without a partition.

After passing through the checkpoint and waiting at the facility, the advocate was informed that the meeting could only take place through glass in the presence of other persons. Alternatively, she was offered to conduct the visit without glass, but (for her own safety) subject to a personal search by a female employee of the facility. The woman refused to be searched, citing her professional status and the absence of grounds for such actions, in particular due to her compliance with the dress code and the open contents of her document folder. In response, E. Shari was informed that refusal to be searched would make it impossible to meet with the convicted person in confidence.

As a result, she was unable to conduct the planned communication and sign the necessary documents with her client.

The advocate is convinced that the refusal to grant a confidential meeting and the requirement for a personal search violate her professional rights, impede the exercise of her advocacy and do not ensure the preservation of attorney-client privilege.

She also pointed out that the facility does not have a specially equipped room for confidential meetings between advocates and their clients, and in most cases, visits are conducted through glass. Therefore, such violations are systematic. At the same time, there are no effective mechanisms to protect the rights of advocates while performing their professional duties in penal institutions.

Oksana Kadenko, Chairman of the UNBA Committee on Free Legal Aid and member of the BCU, drew attention to the fact that in penitentiary institutions, advocates are considered «sources of increased danger» and are subject to additional measures.

She explained that in order to meet the quality standards for the provision of free legal aid, the advocate must sign certain documents with the client, in particular, a protocol of agreement containing attorney-client privilege. When the meeting takes place through glass, the documents are handed over by a prison officer, who checks their content and decides whether to give them to the prisoner.

«The advocate tried to explain, refer to the provisions of the law, and initiate their application to ensure a confidential meeting... without a partition, without an earpiece, with the possibility of handing over documents to the client, directly receiving information and passing it on, but she was refused», - O. Kadenko commented on the situation. Referring to her own experience, she noted that in penal institutions, advocates are indeed sent to rooms equipped with a partition wall, and visits take place in the presence of an employee of the institution.

The BCU member explained the essence of the applicant's position: there are two subsystems under the Ministry of Justice: the penitentiary and the free legal aid. An advocate who has been instructed to provide legal aid is in a vulnerable position in a penal institution. At the same time, the ministry, which has the ability to resolve the problem, does not synchronize the work of these two systems.

Since the problem concerns all advocates, O. Kadenko proposed to make the case of Y. Shara a model case and to organize an open roundtable event on the platform of the Ukrainian National Bar Association with the participation of representatives of the Ministry of Justice and the Parliamentary Commissioner for Human Rights.

«I am confident that this institution will partner with us in resolving these issues, because violations of the right to confidential visits and the lack of mechanisms for the proper implementation of the rights of convicts to access legal aid are not only our issue, but first and foremost the issue of the Human Rights Commissioner, - said the BCU member. - By joining forces, we will be able to achieve real results and change the legal practice, which is necessary for both advocates and convicts».

The members of the Bar Council of Ukraine voted unanimously in favor of this decision.

Popular news

Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure

Advocacy

Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure

The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

16:35 Fri 30.05.25 106
Does the mobilization of a lawyer violate the human right to defense - conclusion of the Supreme Court

Advocacy

Does the mobilization of a lawyer violate the human right to defense - conclusion of the Supreme Court

Article 335 of the CPC provides for the suspension of court proceedings only in cases where the accused was called up for military service during mobilization. However, this provision does not apply to the mobilization of a defense counsel.

16:46 Fri 02.05.25 108
Shoulder straps do not fit the robe: Lidiya Izovitova analyzes models of military courts restoration

Advocacy

Shoulder straps do not fit the robe: Lidiya Izovitova analyzes models of military courts restoration

The Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy held a working meeting to discuss draft laws that provide for the establishment and operation of military courts in Ukraine on a permanent basis. The Institute of Advocacy presented its reservations regarding this initiative.

15:39 Thu 01.05.25 152
UNBA Committee for the protection of advocates' rights responds to accusations regarding the case of «hacker lawyers»

Advocacy

UNBA Committee for the protection of advocates' rights responds to accusations regarding the case of «hacker lawyers»

Dzerkalo Tyzhnia's publications about «hacker lawyers» contain false information, distortions and manipulations that undermine the authority of the Bar. They are a form of unlawful pressure on the UNBA and may be an element of a paid-for campaign.

19:17 Wed 23.04.25 167
Problems of implementation of the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer discussed in the Verkhovna Rada

Advocacy

Problems of implementation of the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer discussed in the Verkhovna Rada

On April 16, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy held a joint working meeting to discuss the feasibility of implementing the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer and introducing the necessary amendments to the current legislation.

18:41 Wed 16.04.25 203
The BCU creates a working group to monitor violations of the rights of lawyers and will consider appealing to the Verkhovna Rada

Advocacy

The BCU creates a working group to monitor violations of the rights of lawyers and will consider appealing to the Verkhovna…

During an extraordinary meeting on April 16, 2025, the Bar Council of Ukraine decided to establish a working group to monitor and summarize the facts of violations of the rights of lawyers and guarantees of the practice of law over the past three years, including the situation with the detention of lawyer Olga Panchenko.

14:16 Wed 16.04.25 141
Judicial independence: a priority that has not yet become a reality

Advocacy

Judicial independence: a priority that has not yet become a reality

Protecting judges from interference is a priority, but its effectiveness in practice raises questions. The High Council of Justice discussed ensuring judicial independence and the authority of justice.

10:46 Wed 16.04.25 102
Temporary protection, work, study: what Ukrainians should know about France and UK

Advocacy

Temporary protection, work, study: what Ukrainians should know about France and UK

What is the procedure for obtaining temporary protection status in France and the UK? When can it be refused and is it possible to appeal such a decision? What are the options for legalization and change of status? What about employment, education and business opportunities?

18:36 Tue 01.04.25 299

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл