Judicial reform bills contain distorted international obligations - ex-NACP member
Oleksandr Seryogin, a former member of the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (hereinafter - the NACP) and an associate professor at the Institute of International Relations, is convinced that the role of international experts in the formation of the judiciary is interpreted in the draft laws on judicial reform as distorting Ukraine’s international obligations.
He stated this during the second national discussion "Access to Justice: Realities and Prospects".
"We are ready to overfulfill the obligations, according to these bills, to solve the problems that will arise after over fulfillment. The destruction of the judicial selection system, which is the core of statehood and the judicial system, constitutes the end of statehood and a systemic problem. These bills are a distortion, an imitation of performance of international obligations ", - Oleksandr Seryogin considers.
The scientist referred to the text of the letter to the IMF Managing Director dated 02.06. 2020, signed by the President of Ukraine and other officials, stating that "Ukraine will ensure that the management and implementation of the selection process of judges and disciplinary mechanisms will be carried out by persons with a high level of competence, trust, and integrity." However, the implementation of this idea must comply with the Constitution. If international obligations contradict the Constitution of Ukraine, constitutional amendments are required to accede to such international obligations.
"In proposing these bills, we should not rewrite international obligations that have the highest legal force. Moreover, we should not rewrite such in a way that contradicts the Constitution. Speaking about the declaration system, if a body with the involvement of third parties is created, then, according to our legislation, this body performs state functions. Therefore, members of these bodies must submit declarations. However, this body was given an advisory status. At the same time, in the proposed bills, advisory functions are completely changed and the functions of state power are appropriated, which contradicts the Constitution,”- Oleksandr Seryohin stressed.
Similarly, he called that the bills are distorted because of the interpretation of the obligation to strengthen administrative procedures as a mechanism to ensure a high level of judicial review of cases in which the decisions of national authorities are challenged.
The former NACP member also criticized the idea of an expert commission for pre-selection of candidates for the High Council of Justice, which has state functions. In his opinion, this replaces the constitutional subjects of the High Council of Justice formation, prescribed in Article 131.
"There are constitutional entities that have the appropriate powers to form a body of judicial governance. To allow these subjects to choose from among the candidates already pre-elected by someone is, at least, a bold attack on their powers, " - Oleksandr Seryogin said.
This position was supported by the Head of the UNBA Committee on Free Legal Aid Oleksandr Drozdov, who referred to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. "Article 31 states that" international treaties are interpreted in good faith, in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context, and in the light of its object and purpose." The one should not take from there those things which are not mentioned, and then apply them at the level of the national legislation,"- said Oleksandr Drozdov.
We recall that during the discussion on November 30 such themes as the role of professional communities in the development of legislation on the judiciary and the bar, the constitutional aspects of the participation of international experts in the formation of judicial governance were discussed. You can watch the full video of the event here.
Popular news
Rule of Law Roadmap
Lidiya Izovitova: reform of the advocacy profession should make the profession stronger and individuals better protected
The Ukrainian advocacy community is finalizing work on a new version of the relevant law. The roadmap on the rule of law has set the fourth quarter of 2026 as the deadline for achieving results in this area. The draft is intended to ensure safeguards for the practice of law through mechanisms of accountability for violations.
Abroad
The first country to ratify the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer
Bosnia and Herzegovina became the first country to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer (CETS No. 226). The country signed the Convention on March 17, 2026, so it took just over seven months to ratify it.
Support
In Edinburgh expressed gratitude to those who are helping Ukrainian advocates and citizens
Since the start of the full-scale invasion, Scottish legal institutions and the Ukrainian community, with the participation of the UNBA, have been helping Ukrainian advocates obtain their qualifications and Ukrainians receive legal assistance. The parties are now planning joint professional and educational events.
Educational events
What to do when you need immediate protection in the LCIA
A dispute with a counterparty has been referred to the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), but it will take several weeks to appoint the arbitrators, and the client needs legal representation immediately? This can be achieved through an emergency arbitrator or expedited tribunal formation.
Educational events
An advocate's meeting with a client outside the office: how to conduct it without giving away too much
If a client suggests meeting in a public place, keep in mind that any name or amount mentioned aloud could be overheard by bystanders. Therefore, it’s important to plan ahead regarding the table, seating arrangements, and the scope of the conversation.
Legislation
The UNBA explained what could undermine the plan to introduce plea agreements
Information regarding who pays whom, how much, and on what grounds under a plea agreement must be made public. However, as long as this information is classified as a state secret or personal data, the court will continue to be able to close proceedings and restrict access to judgments.
Interaction
The UNBA and the German Institute for Eastern Law will prepare joint legal opinions
Ukrainian advocates and German legal scholars will jointly prepare comparative legal studies, expert opinions, and professional events. The UNBA reached this agreement with the Institute for Eastern European Law in Regensburg, which has been researching the laws of Central and Eastern European countries for nearly 70 years.
Educational events
What an advocate can delegate to an assistant, colleagues and AI — and what they cannot
An advocate can delegate even a complex lawsuit to an assistant, consult with colleagues daily, and ask artificial intelligence to find relevant case law. However, it is up to the advocate to proofread the document, verify every reference, and decide what to disclose about the client’s case.
Publications
Vasyl Kolishnyi, «Law and Business» Supporting mental health should become part of the professional culture of the Bar, - H. Udovenko
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection