Judicial reform bills contain distorted international obligations - ex-NACP member
Oleksandr Seryogin, a former member of the National Agency on Corruption Prevention (hereinafter - the NACP) and an associate professor at the Institute of International Relations, is convinced that the role of international experts in the formation of the judiciary is interpreted in the draft laws on judicial reform as distorting Ukraine’s international obligations.
He stated this during the second national discussion "Access to Justice: Realities and Prospects".
"We are ready to overfulfill the obligations, according to these bills, to solve the problems that will arise after over fulfillment. The destruction of the judicial selection system, which is the core of statehood and the judicial system, constitutes the end of statehood and a systemic problem. These bills are a distortion, an imitation of performance of international obligations ", - Oleksandr Seryogin considers.
The scientist referred to the text of the letter to the IMF Managing Director dated 02.06. 2020, signed by the President of Ukraine and other officials, stating that "Ukraine will ensure that the management and implementation of the selection process of judges and disciplinary mechanisms will be carried out by persons with a high level of competence, trust, and integrity." However, the implementation of this idea must comply with the Constitution. If international obligations contradict the Constitution of Ukraine, constitutional amendments are required to accede to such international obligations.
"In proposing these bills, we should not rewrite international obligations that have the highest legal force. Moreover, we should not rewrite such in a way that contradicts the Constitution. Speaking about the declaration system, if a body with the involvement of third parties is created, then, according to our legislation, this body performs state functions. Therefore, members of these bodies must submit declarations. However, this body was given an advisory status. At the same time, in the proposed bills, advisory functions are completely changed and the functions of state power are appropriated, which contradicts the Constitution,”- Oleksandr Seryohin stressed.
Similarly, he called that the bills are distorted because of the interpretation of the obligation to strengthen administrative procedures as a mechanism to ensure a high level of judicial review of cases in which the decisions of national authorities are challenged.
The former NACP member also criticized the idea of an expert commission for pre-selection of candidates for the High Council of Justice, which has state functions. In his opinion, this replaces the constitutional subjects of the High Council of Justice formation, prescribed in Article 131.
"There are constitutional entities that have the appropriate powers to form a body of judicial governance. To allow these subjects to choose from among the candidates already pre-elected by someone is, at least, a bold attack on their powers, " - Oleksandr Seryogin said.
This position was supported by the Head of the UNBA Committee on Free Legal Aid Oleksandr Drozdov, who referred to the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties. "Article 31 states that" international treaties are interpreted in good faith, in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context, and in the light of its object and purpose." The one should not take from there those things which are not mentioned, and then apply them at the level of the national legislation,"- said Oleksandr Drozdov.
We recall that during the discussion on November 30 such themes as the role of professional communities in the development of legislation on the judiciary and the bar, the constitutional aspects of the participation of international experts in the formation of judicial governance were discussed. You can watch the full video of the event here.
Popular news
Greetings
The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice
Denis Maslov’s many years of experience as a advocate, his work as a judge and his tenure as chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine’s Committee on legal policy have given him a deep understanding of how the legal system functions and the challenges it faces.
Legislation
The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy
The section on advocacy and legal aid in the draft anti-corruption strategy for 2026–2030 goes beyond the scope of anti-corruption policy and is inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU
An advocate’s membership in the UNBA is an element of professional status arising by virtue of law, rather than a voluntary private membership in an association. Therefore, failure to disclose it in a declaration should not automatically lead to the conclusion of unethical conduct or the concealment of a private interest.
Discussion
The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture
To mark Ukraine’s Constitution Day, the Center for research on the legal profession and law of the UNBA in collaboration with the «Bykivnia Graves» National Historical and Memorial Reserve organized an online lecture on the history of the Ukrainian constitutional process.
Legislation
The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer
The ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer must be accompanied by targeted amendments to legislation to strengthen safeguards for advocates, but should not be used as a pretext for dismantling the self-governing model of advocacy.
Interaction
A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative
On June 24, as part of European Legal Sovereignty Day, which took place in Brussels, the Manifesto for a Referential of Human Guarantee in the Legal Use of AI was presented.
Court practice
Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026
During martial law, the focus of administrative proceedings shifted: in addition to tax disputes, cases involving access to public information, personal data protection, and challenges to regulatory acts, the docket now includes mobilization issues, challenges to decisions by the TCC and the Special Purpose Commission, disputes regarding deferrals, military service, sanctions, and new administrative restrictions.
Court practice
Lidiya Izovitova identified 7 challenges in administrative proceedings for advocates
The predictability of judicial practice, jurisdictional disputes, cassation filters, enforcement of judgments against the state, the burden of proof, written proceedings, and guarantees for the practice of law remain key issues in administrative justice for advocates.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates