Amendments to Free legal aid, proposed by the Ministry of Justice, undermine human rights

Legislation
15:00 Mon 03.05.21 1080 Reviews
Print

Draft law №5107 "On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts to Facilitate Access to Free Legal Aid and Improve the Quality of Legal Aid" is an example of defiant human rights violations.

This was stated by UNBA\BCU Vice-President Valentyn Gvozdiy during the panel discussion "Development of quality standards for free legal aid in civil and administrative cases."

The event took place online as part of the Council of Europe Project "Support to the Judiciary of Ukraine in Ensuring Better Access to Justice".

In his welcoming speech, Valentyn Gvozdiy voiced UNBA official position on the amendnents, which is set out in numerous decisions of the BCU and appeals to Ukrainian authorities and international legal organizations. He stressed that after analyzing the documents, the UNBA is convinced that authors of the proposed changes blindly copied the experience of other countries, without considering the features of national legislation.

«We urge not to blindly copy other countries` experiences. Yes, indeed, such experience is important. However, we must consider our experience and traditions as well, and respect our Constitution. Otherwise, we will not build the sovereign and independent state», - noted Valentin Gvozdiy.

The Deputy Head of the UNBA, the BCU believes that the introduction of a mechanism for assessing the quality of free legal aid provided by attorneys using "peer review" is an attempt to encroach on the legal professional privilege, which is a gross violation of all principles and standards of advocacy.

"Today, free legal aid exists to protect the most vulnerable segments of the population, those people who are unable to provide legal protection and legal aid on their own. This law takes away the last thing from them - the right to the attorney-client privilege and so on. And the cynicism is that with one hand the state will assist, with the other - it will violate people's rights", - Valentyn Gvozdiy stressed.

The UNBA is also concerned about who will evaluate the quality of the provided free legal aid (hereinafter - FLA). Thus, by the provisions of these bills, such an assessment will be conducted by a special commission, to which attorneys-experts will be selected by the Ministry of Justice.

"We believe that the provision of legal assistance by dubious subjects, as proposed in the bill - is a bold mockery of vulnerable groups," - said Valentin Gvozdiy.

He also drew attention to the fact that these bills were prepared without the participation of the direct participants in these changes - the attorneys` community.

«The Ministry of Justice has not addressed us with any inquiries, has not analyzed the work of the commission on the quality of Free legal aid so far. We can say that complaints about the quality of the FLA provided today are minimal. We have proposed different approaches to how the quality of FLA can be improved. And we believe that it is not right to interfere in the attorney-client privilege and to humiliate recipients of FLA through such procedures», - he stressed.

Valentyn Gvozdiy expressed hope for better communication between the Ministry of Justice and the UNBA and the involvement of the attorneys` community in the process of drafting not only bills but also other mechanisms of work in the field of free legal aid.

It will be recalled that in April Bar Council of Ukraine called for the draft laws “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts Concerning Simplification of Access to Free Legal Aid and Improving the Quality of Its Provision” №5107  dated  February 19, 2021, and “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts Concerning simplification of access to free legal aid and improvement of the quality of its provision ” №5107-1 dated March 9, 2021, were sent for revision, as they were prepared and registered without the participation of the attorneys` community.

After analyzing these bills, the UNBA has identified numerous problems and serious shortcomings that are contrary to international law and should be resolved at the legislative level solely by the joint efforts of state bodies and bar self-government bodies. The UNBA believes that the proposed bills are not aimed at improving the quality of FLA, but other grounds, not excluding obtaining serious leverage over independent attorneys and obtaining additional budget funding to establish and ensure the activities of the commission proposed by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine or other commissions.

After analyzing these bills, UNBA has identified numerous problems and serious shortcomings that are contrary to international law and should be resolved at the legislative level solely by the joint efforts of state bodies and bar self-government bodies. UNBA believes that the proposed bills are not aimed at improving the quality of FLA, but other grounds, not excluding obtaining serious leverage over independent attorneys and obtaining additional budget funding to establish and ensure the activities of the commission proposed by the Ministry of Justice of Ukraine or other commissions.

The previous draft Law “On Amendments to Certain Laws of Ukraine on Facilitating Access to Free Legal Aid for Children and Persons with Disabilities and Improving the Quality of Its Provision” with similar proposals was registered under №702704 dated December 28, 2019, but was withdrawn on March 14, 2020, after the categorical objections from the Ukrainian National Bar Association.

BCU has repeatedly opposed the introduction of such a mechanism to control the quality of professional legal assistance provided by attorneys in any form.

In the decision №33 of April 1, BCU decided to send an appeal to the President of Ukraine, the Head of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, the Head of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy, the Prime Minister of Ukraine, and the Minister of Justice of Ukraine on the return (revocation, rejection) of bills № 5107 and revision of the bill № 5107-1.

 

Popular news

UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession

Advocacy

UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession

The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

14:19 Fri 06.06.25 107
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure

Advocacy

Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure

The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

16:35 Fri 30.05.25 181
BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy

Advocacy

BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy

The Bar Council of Ukraine will appeal to the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, Vasyl Malyuk, regarding the verification of information about «negative trends in the legal profession» disseminated by some media outlets on behalf of the SSU.

17:34 Wed 14.05.25 137
Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature

Advocacy

Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature

Thirteen member states of the Council of Europe have signed the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate, which was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on March 12, 2025. Four more countries will do so today. Ukraine is not among them.

9:28 Wed 14.05.25 163
BCU initiates resolution of the issue of visits by advocates to convicted persons

Advocacy

BCU initiates resolution of the issue of visits by advocates to convicted persons

Article 110 of the Criminal Enforcement Code guarantees convicted persons confidentiality of meetings with their advocate. One of the important elements is the possibility to communicate with an advocate in a room without a solid partition. In practice, this provision of the law is systematically violated.

12:32 Wed 07.05.25 131
Advocates, academics, and experts examine problems in forensic examination (video)

Advocacy

Advocates, academics, and experts examine problems in forensic examination (video)

The Ukrainian National Bar Association, in cooperation with leading scientific and research institutes of forensic expertise, organized a round table on expert support for legal practice.

14:39 Mon 05.05.25 148
Does the mobilization of a lawyer violate the human right to defense - conclusion of the Supreme Court

Advocacy

Does the mobilization of a lawyer violate the human right to defense - conclusion of the Supreme Court

Article 335 of the CPC provides for the suspension of court proceedings only in cases where the accused was called up for military service during mobilization. However, this provision does not apply to the mobilization of a defense counsel.

16:46 Fri 02.05.25 143
Searching for a model of elections for post-war Ukraine: conclusions of the round table

Advocacy

Searching for a model of elections for post-war Ukraine: conclusions of the round table

Reforming Ukraine's electoral system is extremely important in the context of the upcoming post-war elections. In particular, the realization of the right to vote should be facilitated by improving the voting system. But today Ukraine faces numerous challenges.

12:51 Fri 02.05.25 115

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл