How will the EU regulate artificial intelligence (AI), and what should Ukraine expect?
The European Union is approaching adopting a regulation that will govern the use of artificial intelligence. Ukraine will also have to regulate this area. What experience should be taken into account?
This was discussed during the second meeting of the UNBA Working Group on legal Regulation of artificial intelligence, formed by the Ukrainian National Bar Association. The event was attended by representatives of the Verkhovna Rada (Parliament) Committee on Digital Transformation, the Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine, the Secretariat of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights (Ombudsman), and the IT Ukraine Association.
"Today, we see problems arising from the activities of products that use artificial intelligence. This includes voice substitution, image substitution, and personality substitution. This violates the property rights of people and businesses and commits offenses," said Valentyn Gvozdiy, Chairman of the Working Group, UNBA Vice President, "The UNBA, which is the regulator of the profession in Ukraine and is a self-governing organization that unites all lawyers, has taken the initiative to start the process of developing ways of Regulation that could be proposed to our parliament in the future.
Hanna Udovenko, Senior Assistant to the Head of the Working Group, revealed the critical provisions of the draft EU Regulation on Artificial Intelligence Act.
Artificial intelligence is proposed to be defined as a machine system designed to function with varying levels of autonomy and that can produce results such as forecasts, recommendations, or decisions that affect the physical or virtual environment for explicit or implicit purposes.
The Regulation aims to promote the implementation of human-centered and reliable artificial intelligence and to ensure a high level of protection of health, safety, fundamental rights, democracy, and the rule of law, as well as the environment from the harmful effects of artificial intelligence.
To this end, the document proposes, in particular, to introduce rules for the placement on the market, commissioning, and use of AI systems; prohibitions on certain practices in the field of AI; requirements for high-risk AI systems and their operators; transparency rules for systems that interact with individuals to recognize emotions and biometric categorization and edit images, video, and audio; rules for market monitoring, market surveillance, and governance; measures to support innovation with a particular focus on SMEs and start-ups, including regulatory sandboxes and targeted measures aimed at reducing the regulatory burden (to view the entire project presentation, please follow the link).
The EU Artificial Intelligence Regulation is scheduled to come into force at the end of 2025.
We are following the European integration path, and Ukraine will have to implement the Artificial Intelligence Act, which is currently being developed for EU countries. This opinion was expressed by Mykhailo Kryachko, Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Digital Transformation. At the same time, he noted the need to study the experience of Asian countries. "They took a different path. This is partial Regulation or deregulation in general," explained the MP. "It is clear that they do this to encourage future stakeholders to invest in their countries. Mr. Kryachko emphasized that we should remember domestic producers and study the best practices of Canada, where the emphasis is on encouraging AI.
The head of the Parliamentary Committee also suggested creating a working group based on his Committee.
Volodymyr Behei, the state expert of the expert group on the development of new technologies and digital innovations of the Digital Economy Directorate of the Ministry of Digital Transformation, recalled that in 2020, they created a Committee for the Study of Artificial Intelligence, which included developers, scientists, and researchers. Today, this Committee has 53 members. The Committee has several working groups, one of which is dedicated to the issue of Regulation.
"We are also members of the Council of Europe Committee on Artificial Intelligence. Its outcome will be a Convention - a framework document that will legally oblige the development and application of AI based on the Council of Europe standards on human rights, democracy, and the rule of law," said V. Begei. - "The main focus of our work in the Council of Europe on this Convention is on the critical issues of risks from the use of AI. The result of our work will be adopting legislation at the national level to regulate this area.
According to the expert, this issue was considered by the Committee's working group. "We considered several important issues regarding various forms and possibilities of regulating this area. In general, our vision is that any chosen path should consider the interests of national AI developers," said the Ministry of Digital Transformation representative. - "We must understand that our movement towards Europe obliges us to implement the laws of the European Commission on artificial intelligence. But we must also take into account the opinion of national producers."
Nataliia Shcherbyna, Deputy Director of the Department for Monitoring of Information Rights of the Ombudsman's Office, the Ministry of Digital Transformation, and the EU4DigitalUA project spoke about the joint work of the Ombudsman's Office and the EU4DigitalUA project.
"To prepare for any possible challenges in the field of artificial intelligence regulation, some recommendations are needed, including in terms of personal data protection, before regulations are agreed, and a regulatory model is chosen," she warned. - "We have asked our partners and EU project experts to help us with such a study of AI technologies in terms of personal data protection. And this study will have several aspects: the role of AI in the modern world, the impact of AI on human rights, legislation and ethical aspects of data protection and AI technologies, and assessment of personal data protection risks when using AI." The study of these issues is expected to result in recommendations for government agencies and industry IT companies.
The expertise of the Ukrainian National Bar Association members and the possibility of additional involvement of specialists, including those from abroad, may help develop best practices in Ukraine and implement them in our legislation. Mr. Gvozdiy expressed this opinion. "We all realize that we are now in the process of European integration. We must work as hard as possible to harmonize Ukrainian legislation with EU legislation. That is why we can welcome the proposal of Mykhailo Kryachko, Chairman of the relevant parliamentary Committee, to establish a working group under the parliament," commented the UNBA Vice President, "It is vital that those investors who come to us, companies, and dealers, should not only feel comfortable but also feel like they are in developed jurisdictions.
Popular news
Legislation
UNBA initiatives to implement the Roadmap were supported by international experts
International experts who participated in the inaugural meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in advocacy and agreed to join it expressed their support for the initiative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
Legislation
How will the group responsible for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy operate?
The working group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy will operate at several levels: plenary meetings as a platform for adopting framework decisions, a coordination bureau for compiling documents and calendar control, and thematic subgroups for preparing norms and their justification. International experts will verify the results against European standards and «red lines».
Legislation
Advocacy is a responsible entity, not a critic of reform — V. Gvozdiy
The Roadmap on the Rule of Law is not a basis for restructuring the model of advocacy, but a framework for verifying and improving the already European-oriented system. At the same time, part of the work has already been done, so further progress should be made in the form of coordinated and practical decisions.
Legislation
Vatras on the implementation of the Roadmap: only advocates should create their own destiny
Work on implementing the Roadmap in relation to advocacy should be based on the participation of the professional community itself, and key tasks should be structured in such a way as to avoid mixing processes that differ in content and procedure.
Legislation
Lidiya Izovitova outlined the approach to implementing the Roadmap for advocacy
The general approach to working on the implementation of the Roadmap on the Rule of Law in terms of reforming advocacy should not be based on «slogans», but rather on gathering facts, comparing them with standards, consulting with the professional community, and formulating norms for which participants are prepared to take responsibility.
Legislation
Roadmap and advocacy: working group holds first meeting
On January 2, the first organizational meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy reform took place. The event was devoted to agreeing on the framework for further work and exchanging the initial positions of the participants.
Self-government
BCU: NACP initiatives regarding the Bar are unconstitutional interference
The Bar Council of Ukraine has condemned the initiatives to reform the Bar proposed by the National Agency on Corruption Prevention as direct, gross and systematic interference by the executive branch in the activities of an independent constitutional institution.
Self-government
UNBA program for implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law published
In order to ensure the implementation of measures set out in the Roadmap on the Rule of Law, the Bar Council of Ukraine approved a program for its implementation in relation to the reform of advocacy.
Publications
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…