Court confirms legitimacy of disbarment for participation in covert investigative (search) actions

The obligation of an attorney to cooperate confidentially during operational and investigative measures or investigative actions is a violation of the Law «On the Advocacy and Practice of Law» and may result in disciplinary liability.
This conclusion was reached by the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal in case No. 640/21514/21. The relevant resolution dated 31.10.2023 was recently published in the Unified State Register of Court Decisions.
The lawyer filed a statement with the SBU reporting the fact of extortion of undue advantage by an officer of the National Police of Ukraine in a car theft case (in this case, the lawyer provided legal services to the suspect).
The State Bureau of Investigation opened criminal proceedings based on this statement. During the interrogation of the lawyer, it was found that the SBU officers had given him funds to control the commission of the crime in the form of a special investigative experiment. This covert action resulted in the detention of a National Police officer. The latter filed a complaint against the lawyer with the QDCB.
The Disciplinary Chamber of the QDCB concluded that under the circumstances, the advocate participated in confidential cooperation, using his status as a lawyer and defense counsel for his client in criminal proceedings. Therefore, the advocate was brought to responsibility in the form of disbarment, with subsequent exclusion of information from the Unified Register of Advocates.
The lawyer appealed to the administrative court. He believed that the decision of the QDCB did not meet the requirements of the law due to the absence of a violation of the oath of an advocate of Ukraine, the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Law «On the Advocacy and Practice of Law», given that the contested decision did not specifically indicate which actions of the plaintiff as an advocate had signs of disciplinary misconduct.
The first instance dismissed the claim, so the attorney filed an appeal.
The Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal referred to Art. 275 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which prohibits the involvement of lawyers, in particular, in confidential cooperation during covert investigative actions, if such cooperation is related to the disclosure of confidential professional information.
The appeal also took into account the decision of the Bar Council of Ukraine No. 123 dated 15.11.2019, which approved an explanation of the inadmissibility of involving a lawyer in confidential cooperation with pre-trial investigation authorities with the client's consent.
In this decision, the BCU emphasized the legislatively defined obligation of law enforcement agencies to carry out operational and investigative measures or investigative actions within the framework of the current legislation.
The advocate's consent to confidential cooperation during operational and investigative measures is a violation of the Law and, accordingly, may entail disciplinary liability.
In this decision, the BCU explained that in the context of the provisions of Art. 23 of the Law and the CPC, each advocate is obliged to refrain from participating in confidential cooperation during operational and investigative measures or investigative actions, since such cooperation may lead to the disclosure of the attorney-client privilege, while in case of receiving proposals for such illegal actions, advocates should apply to law enforcement agencies and report such facts to the regional bar councils in order to protect their rights and guarantee the practice of law.
The court separately reminded that in accordance with Part 1 of Art. 57 of the Law, decisions of the Bar Council of Ukraine are binding on all advocates.
Based on this, the panel of judges of the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal stated that the lawyer, in violation of the Law and the CPC, allowed confidential cooperation with the pre-trial investigation authorities.
Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, and the decision of the court of first instance was upheld.
Popular news

Self-government
The HCJ continues to ignore the legal deadlines for forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ
The High Council of Justice continues to violate the statutory deadlines for forming a new competition commission to select members of the Competition Commission of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

Advocacy
Another conflict with the TCC: an advocate's leg was broken and his client jumped out of a window
On June 19, at the premises of the military medical commission, where a bus from the Krasnograd Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support delivered several people, an incident occurred involving the use of physical force against an advocate.

Advocacy
Independence of advocacy and accountability of expertise: different models, shared responsibility
Two different models of professional organization coexist in Ukraine: advocacy with established self-government and judicial and expert activities that remain under state control. How can approaches be balanced, the openness of expert opinions ensured, and effective interaction between specialists established?

Advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of t…
On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

Advocacy
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession
The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

Advocacy
Andriy Osipov appointed head of the Ukrainian State Film Agency
The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has appointed Andriy Osipov as head of the Ukrainian State Film Agency.

Advocacy
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure
The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

Advocacy
Forensic expertise and business: what advocates need to know in 2025
Forensic examinations remain a key tool in criminal proceedings against businesses. However, practitioners face new challenges, ranging from inconsistencies in the property seizure procedure to difficulties in formulating requests and gathering relevant evidence.
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…