Court confirms legitimacy of disbarment for participation in covert investigative (search) actions

Advocacy
15:00 Mon 13.11.23 28 Reviews
Print

The obligation of an attorney to cooperate confidentially during operational and investigative measures or investigative actions is a violation of the Law «On the Advocacy and Practice of Law» and may result in disciplinary liability.

This conclusion was reached by the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal in case No. 640/21514/21. The relevant resolution dated 31.10.2023 was recently published in the Unified State Register of Court Decisions.

The lawyer filed a statement with the SBU reporting the fact of extortion of undue advantage by an officer of the National Police of Ukraine in a car theft case (in this case, the lawyer provided legal services to the suspect).

The State Bureau of Investigation opened criminal proceedings based on this statement. During the interrogation of the lawyer, it was found that the SBU officers had given him funds to control the commission of the crime in the form of a special investigative experiment. This covert action resulted in the detention of a National Police officer. The latter filed a complaint against the lawyer with the QDCB.

The Disciplinary Chamber of the QDCB concluded that under the circumstances, the advocate participated in confidential cooperation, using his status as a lawyer and defense counsel for his client in criminal proceedings. Therefore, the advocate was brought to responsibility in the form of disbarment, with subsequent exclusion of information from the Unified Register of Advocates.

The lawyer appealed to the administrative court. He believed that the decision of the QDCB did not meet the requirements of the law due to the absence of a violation of the oath of an advocate of Ukraine, the Rules of Professional Conduct and the Law «On the Advocacy and Practice of Law», given that the contested decision did not specifically indicate which actions of the plaintiff as an advocate had signs of disciplinary misconduct.

The first instance dismissed the claim, so the attorney filed an appeal.

The Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal referred to Art. 275 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which prohibits the involvement of lawyers, in particular, in confidential cooperation during covert investigative actions, if such cooperation is related to the disclosure of confidential professional information.

The appeal also took into account the decision of the Bar Council of Ukraine No. 123 dated 15.11.2019, which approved an explanation of the inadmissibility of involving a lawyer in confidential cooperation with pre-trial investigation authorities with the client's consent.

In this decision, the BCU emphasized the legislatively defined obligation of law enforcement agencies to carry out operational and investigative measures or investigative actions within the framework of the current legislation.

The advocate's consent to confidential cooperation during operational and investigative measures is a violation of the Law and, accordingly, may entail disciplinary liability.

In this decision, the BCU explained that in the context of the provisions of Art. 23 of the Law and the CPC, each advocate is obliged to refrain from participating in confidential cooperation during operational and investigative measures or investigative actions, since such cooperation may lead to the disclosure of the attorney-client privilege, while in case of receiving proposals for such illegal actions, advocates should apply to law enforcement agencies and report such facts to the regional bar councils in order to protect their rights and guarantee the practice of law.

The court separately reminded that in accordance with Part 1 of Art. 57 of the Law, decisions of the Bar Council of Ukraine are binding on all advocates.

Based on this, the panel of judges of the Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal stated that the lawyer, in violation of the Law and the CPC, allowed confidential cooperation with the pre-trial investigation authorities.

Therefore, the appeal was dismissed, and the decision of the court of first instance was upheld.

Popular news

Advocacy

The rule of law and the right to defense: Ukraine in the spotlight at the BIC meeting at the IBA

Representatives of the Ukrainian legal community had the opportunity to tell their colleagues from many countries about the professional problems faced by defense lawyers during the war.

16:59 Wed 01.11.23 129

Advocacy

Protection of the rights of Ukrainian lawyers goes international

The Law Society of England and Wales will provide institutional support to the Ukrainian National Bar Association. To protect the rights of lawyers at the international level, the project «Lawyers at Risk» has been launched.

15:40 Wed 01.11.23 112

Advocacy

Confirmation of trademark use: AIPPI adopted a resolution

What facts and circumstances can be taken into account to recognize the true use of a trademark, how to prove its use, is it possible to use a trademark in a form other than the registered one, when the use of the trademark does not change the distinctiveness of the already registered trademark?

15:20 Wed 01.11.23 113

Advocacy

UNBA is represented at a high level at the IBA Annual Conference in Paris

From October 28 to November 03, 2023, the annual conference of the International Bar Association (IBA) is taking place in Paris, bringing together more than 6 thousand lawyers from around the world. This is a high-level event where topical issues of the world bar are discussed, and ways to solve international legal problems are sought.

14:12 Wed 01.11.23 106

Advocacy

How will specialists in village councils assess the work of lawyers? The Cabinet of Ministers Resolution needs to be changed

The Cabinet of Ministers, in regulating the organisation of free primary legal aid by local governments, agreed with the UNBA's position on the need to abolish the requirements for the qualifications of lawyers involved in such assistance. However, the issue of monitoring the quality of FLA requires further changes.

18:00 Tue 24.10.23 123

Advocacy

The Rules of Effective Procedure are the law, not internal recommendations (decision of the BCU)

When considering cases, courts may be guided solely by the provisions of the Constitution and laws of Ukraine. And in resolving procedural issues, no rules of court procedure, based even on the best recommendations, can be applied, as they are not a source of law.

15:00 Tue 24.10.23 118

Advocacy

The defence of the rights of advocates was led by Yevhen Solodko

Yevhen Solodko, lawyer, Honoured Lawyer of Ukraine, has been appointed as the Chair of the Committee on Protection of Advocates' Rights and Guarantees of Legal Practice of the Ukrainian National Bar Association.

10:00 Tue 19.09.23 108

Advocacy

The history of the bar will be researched by the CSHAU

The Central State Historical Archive of Ukraine (Kyiv) will facilitate research, archaeological, exhibition and popularisation activities in the field of research on the history of the Ukrainian Bar and preservation of its archival and documentary heritage.

18:53 Thu 14.09.23 170

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл