Fixed fee: time of work is important for reimbursement of attorney's fees – SC

The procedure for calculating the hourly fee differs from the fixed fee, which does not take into account the actual time spent. However, in both cases, they are taken into account when deciding on the reimbursement of legal aid expenses.
This was pointed out by the Commercial Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court in its additional resolution No. 910/12155/22 dated February 13, 2024, the text of which has recently appeared in the USRCD.
Having won the dispute in the cassation instance, the company asked the court to recover legal aid costs in the amount of UAH 18 thousand from its procedural opponent. The latter considered this amount to be excessive and filed a motion to reduce the legal fees to UAH 3 thousand.
Among the reasons for reducing the costs, he pointed out that the amount of costs was not commensurate with the complexity of the case and the work performed by the lawyers.
The high judges reminded that the main grounds and principles for reimbursement of legal aid costs are set out in paragraphs 7.1 - 7.9 of the resolution of the Supreme Court of Ukraine dated 05.07.2023 in case No. 911/3312/21. Also, the Supreme Court composed of judges of the Joint Chamber of the CGS considered the issue of expenses for the payment of attorney's fees in its resolutions of 02.02.2024 in case No. 910/9714/22 and of 03.11.2023 in case No. 914/2355/21.
According to part 4 of Art. 126 of the EPC, the amount of expenses for attorney's fees should be commensurate with:
1) the complexity of the case and the work performed by the attorney (services rendered);
2) the time spent by the advocate to perform the relevant work (services);
3) the scope of services rendered by the advocate and work performed;
4) the value of the claim and (or) the importance of the case for the party, including the impact of the case resolution on the reputation of the party or public interest in the case.
In case of non-compliance with these requirements, the court may, at the request of the other party, reduce the amount of costs. In this case the burden of proving disproportionality of expenses is on the party applying for their reduction.
In the case under consideration the fixed amount of the fee was established. In this case, the actual amount of time spent by the attorney in providing services to the client is not calculated. The amount of the fee is determined only by agreement between the advocate and the client, and the court has no right to interfere in these legal relations. At the same time, the obligations between the advocate and the client are not binding on the court in the context of deciding on the distribution of court costs.
Therefore, a party may prove the disproportionality of expenses, including, but not limited to, without specifying in the detailed description of the work (services rendered) information about the time spent on the provision of legal assistance. And taking into account the specific circumstances, the court may limit the amount, taking into account the reasonable necessity of court costs in the case.
Taking into account the disproportionality of the amount of the fixed fee to the complexity of the case, the price of the claim, the volume of materials in the case, the number of procedural documents prepared, and the number of meetings, the Supreme Court concluded that the claimed amount of compensation for expenses was excessive, and therefore awarded it partially in the amount of UAH 10 thousand.
Popular news

Advocacy
The BCU defended 36 lawyers accused by the TCC of disrupting mobilization
The actions of the lawyers described in the appeal of the Bucha District Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support as unlawful offenses are in fact the exercise of legal powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients - citizens of Ukraine who are liable for military service.

Advocacy
Parliamentary instruments should not be used for private interests - statement of crime
Law enforcement agencies should assess whether an MP is using the parliamentary research tool in private interests. Involvement of the Research Service of the Verkhovna Rada in tasks not provided for in its Regulations has signs of corruption.

Advocacy
Call of Rivne Regional State Administration not to apply to lawyers violates the Constitution, - UNBA statement
The Rivne Regional State Administration encourages the families of prisoners not to rush to contact private lawyers or attorneys for legal support. The UNBA called this position a violation of the constitutional guarantee of everyone's right to professional legal assistance.

Advocacy
Advocates and forensic experts join forces: plans for cooperation discussed
At the National Scientific Center «Bokarius Institute of Forensic Expertise» of the Ministry of Justice, a working meeting was held between the management of this expert institution and Lidiya Izovitova, the President of the National Bar Association of Ukraine, the Bar Council of Ukraine.

Advocacy
The Constitution is the same in TCCs and outside them, - the Secretary of the BCU on the rules for lawyers
The Land Forces of the Armed Forces of Ukraine are working to eliminate shortcomings in the work of territorial recruitment and social support centers. In particular, they want to create rules for lawyers who defend people liable for military service.

Advocacy
5 more advocates received financial support from the UNBA Board of Trustees
On January 28, 2025, the UNBA Board of Trustees held its first meeting of the year. The Board considered 8 applications from advocates who found themselves in difficult life circumstances due to the war.

Advocacy
Mental health support for lawyers will be put on a platform
The project to support the mental health of Ukrainian lawyers during the war, implemented by the Ukrainian National Bar Association with the support of the International Bar Association (IBA), will get its own electronic platform.

Advocacy
Legal aid during mobilization: TCC sees no problems
The military authorities claim that the training center or distribution center is not a place of detention. There is normal (taking into account the regime) access, including for lawyers. But practice shows the opposite.
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…