Advocates should not be responsible for communication during court hearings
In the context of permanent blackouts and instability of telecommunication equipment, lawyers and other participants in court cases should not be responsible for the risks of technical impossibility of participating in a videoconference during a court hearing.
During the meeting on June 7, the members of the Bar Council of Ukraine analyzed the provisions of the Regulation on the Procedure for the Functioning of Certain Subsystems (Modules) of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System, approved by the decision of the HCJ of 17.08.2021 No. 1845/0/15-21, and drew attention to its clause 46.
According to the current version, if the court has the technical capability, a party to the case may participate in a court hearing via videoconference outside the court premises using its own technical means in accordance with the procedure established by the procedural law.
It was also established that the risks of technical impossibility of participating in a videoconference outside the courtroom, interruption of communication, etc. are borne by the party to the case who submitted the relevant application.
In this regard, the participants of the meeting recalled the decision of the BCU of November 16-17, 2022, No. 148 «On the validity of the reasons for the absence of a lawyer from a court hearing, investigative actions, etc. during martial law».
At that time, the Council pointed out that the rules of the procedural codes provide for the possibility of participation of participants in the case in a court hearing via video conference. However, due to missile strikes on critical and civilian infrastructure, shopping and business centers, and residential buildings, there are power outages, emergency and planned power outages, which undoubtedly affects the quality or lack of communication.
Force majeure circumstances, including military events and other similar circumstances, are considered to be one of the valid reasons for a person's failure to respond to a call. Therefore, there are sufficient grounds to believe that the circumstances related to the introduction of martial law, including the loss of Internet connection or electricity during participation in a videoconference, are force majeure circumstances, which is a valid reason for the failure of advocates to appear at court hearings, investigative actions, pre-trial investigation bodies, administrative jurisdiction, etc.
Therefore, in the opinion of the UNBA members, the provision of clause 46 of the Regulation on the risks of technical impossibility of participation in a videoconference should be removed from the Regulation.
The UNBA's appeal will be sent to the High Council of Justice.
It should be reminded that the UJITS video conferencing subsystem provides:
1) video and audio recording of court hearings, booking (reservation) of courtrooms, the possibility for the parties to the case to submit documents (including procedural documents, written and electronic evidence, etc.) during the court hearing via videoconference;
2) the possibility for users to participate in meetings of other bodies and institutions of the justice system via videoconference.
In order to participate in a court hearing via videoconference, a party to the case must first register in the Electronic Cabinet. The party to the case must also check his/her own technical means for compliance with the technical requirements set forth in the User Manual of the videoconferencing subsystem for working with the system.
Popular news
Advocacy
UNBA to file criminal complaints about violations of advocates' rights
Recently, the UNBA has received more frequent appeals about violations of the rights of lawyers and guarantees of the practice of law. Including by employees of the territorial centers of recruitment and social support. Some of the facts contain signs of a crime.
Advocacy
An extract from the URAU will be available in your personal account
Starting Monday, September 23, lawyers will be able to independently generate extracts from the Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine through their personal electronic account on the website of the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
Advocacy
A Register of Administrative Proceedings on Lawyers' Complaints to Be Established in Ukraine
All cases of unlawful refusal to provide information at the request of lawyers, the requests of the QDCB, their chambers or members will be recorded in the Register of applications (appeals) on administrative offenses. The relevant terms of reference have already been submitted to the IT service for implementation.
Advocacy
The shadow report on justice will be evaluated at the BCU
Recently, the so-called Shadow Report to the Justice and Fundamental Rights section of the European Commission's Report on Ukraine was published, prepared by a coalition of NGOs led by the Agency for Legislative Initiatives with the support of the European Union's Pravo-Justice Project and other NGOs.
Advocacy
Ukraine on the way to the OECD: the Bar contributes to the implementation of the program
Accession to the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development is a common challenge for all national institutions, on which the European future of the state depends. The Bar contributes to the implementation of the relevant OECD Program for Ukraine.
Advocacy
The work on the Convention on the Protection of the Legal Profession has been completed
The Council of Europe has prepared the final text of the draft Convention on the Protection of the Legal Profession, the world's first document that sets international standards for the protection of lawyers, guarantees their independence and protects them from risks associated with the performance of their professional duties.
Advocacy
The UNBA is studying additional opportunities to support advocates
The full-scale invasion has seriously affected the mental health of all Ukrainians. There are certain vulnerable groups that have been most affected by the war in their personal and professional lives, including lawyers.
Advocacy
Everyone deserves protection, the Bar fulfills this requirement of the Constitution
The formation of the opinion in society that lawyers somehow choose their clients incorrectly because some people are not worthy of defense is a very dangerous phenomenon for the state. In the future, our enemies can use it against Ukraine.
Publications
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences
Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…