Advocates should not be responsible for communication during court hearings

In the context of permanent blackouts and instability of telecommunication equipment, lawyers and other participants in court cases should not be responsible for the risks of technical impossibility of participating in a videoconference during a court hearing.
During the meeting on June 7, the members of the Bar Council of Ukraine analyzed the provisions of the Regulation on the Procedure for the Functioning of Certain Subsystems (Modules) of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System, approved by the decision of the HCJ of 17.08.2021 No. 1845/0/15-21, and drew attention to its clause 46.
According to the current version, if the court has the technical capability, a party to the case may participate in a court hearing via videoconference outside the court premises using its own technical means in accordance with the procedure established by the procedural law.
It was also established that the risks of technical impossibility of participating in a videoconference outside the courtroom, interruption of communication, etc. are borne by the party to the case who submitted the relevant application.
In this regard, the participants of the meeting recalled the decision of the BCU of November 16-17, 2022, No. 148 «On the validity of the reasons for the absence of a lawyer from a court hearing, investigative actions, etc. during martial law».
At that time, the Council pointed out that the rules of the procedural codes provide for the possibility of participation of participants in the case in a court hearing via video conference. However, due to missile strikes on critical and civilian infrastructure, shopping and business centers, and residential buildings, there are power outages, emergency and planned power outages, which undoubtedly affects the quality or lack of communication.
Force majeure circumstances, including military events and other similar circumstances, are considered to be one of the valid reasons for a person's failure to respond to a call. Therefore, there are sufficient grounds to believe that the circumstances related to the introduction of martial law, including the loss of Internet connection or electricity during participation in a videoconference, are force majeure circumstances, which is a valid reason for the failure of advocates to appear at court hearings, investigative actions, pre-trial investigation bodies, administrative jurisdiction, etc.
Therefore, in the opinion of the UNBA members, the provision of clause 46 of the Regulation on the risks of technical impossibility of participation in a videoconference should be removed from the Regulation.
The UNBA's appeal will be sent to the High Council of Justice.
It should be reminded that the UJITS video conferencing subsystem provides:
1) video and audio recording of court hearings, booking (reservation) of courtrooms, the possibility for the parties to the case to submit documents (including procedural documents, written and electronic evidence, etc.) during the court hearing via videoconference;
2) the possibility for users to participate in meetings of other bodies and institutions of the justice system via videoconference.
In order to participate in a court hearing via videoconference, a party to the case must first register in the Electronic Cabinet. The party to the case must also check his/her own technical means for compliance with the technical requirements set forth in the User Manual of the videoconferencing subsystem for working with the system.
Popular news

Legislation
UNBA supported the draft law on restoring sovereignty
The Ukrainian people alone have the right to form state authorities. Delegating powers to form authorities to persons who are not citizens of Ukraine is contrary to the provisions of the Constitution.

Legal Aid
A new competition for FLA advocates has begun
A competition has been announced to select advocates who will be involved in providing free secondary legal aid. It will last until December 8, 2025, throughout Ukraine, except for Donetsk, Luhansk regions, and the Autonomous Republic of Crimea.

Guarantees of the practice of law
The CCBE called for the urgent ratification of the Convention on the protection of the profession of advocate
The Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) has called on all states to sign and ratify the Council of Europe Convention on the protection of the profession of advocate as soon as possible, as the integrity of justice and trust in the rule of law depend on it.

Announcements
Ukrainians are invited to participate in an international competition for young advocates
Applications are now being accepted for the 2026 Young European Advocates Contest, organized by the Academy of European Law (ERA) and the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE).

Discussion
Attempts to discredit advocates go beyond freedom of speech — IBA and UNBA meeting
On September 17, as part of his working visit to Ukraine, Mark Ellis, Executive director of the International Bar Association (IBA), visited the Ukrainian National Bar Association, where a working meeting was held on ensuring guarantees for the practice of law in Ukraine.

Other
Data from registers on powers of attorney and wills compromised – NCU
During testing of the e-notary system, it was established that the test (training) version contained all data on powers of attorney, wills, and documents registered in the Unified Register of Powers of Attorney and the Inheritance Register copied up to a certain date.

Guarantees of the practice of law
IBA’s BIC supports UNBA: advocates should not be identified with their clients
The International Bar Association's Bar Issues Commission (IBA’s BIC) has sent a letter to the President of the Ukrainian National Bar Association expressing concern over the UNBA's reporting of attacks on the independence of the legal profession and the safety of lawyers in Ukraine.

Legal defence of military personnel
Sincerity, respect, and trust: what is important when communicating with military personnel and veterans
War changes people not only through their experiences on the front lines or losses, but above all through their perceptions of security, justice, and the limits of their own endurance. Therefore, communication with military personnel and veterans goes beyond psychological issues and becomes a matter of public culture, human rights practice, and even professional ethics for advocates.
Publications

Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences