Experts outlined the possibilities of MME during the preliminary medical examination
Forensic medical examination is an effective way to protect the rights of persons liable for military service, as well as a tool that ensures the objectives of military medical examination in the Armed Forces of Ukraine (high-quality medical examination of servicemen, conscription, and enlistment).
Experts discussed the possibilities of forensic medical examination during the military medical examination, appealing against the decisions of the military medical examination board, as well as the legal and medical aspects of these processes during a webinar organized recently by the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
One of the speakers at the event was Natalia Ergard, a doctor and forensic expert, who spoke about the aspects of confirming the diagnosis of persons undergoing a medical qualification commission. In particular, she drew attention to the way in which diagnoses that are not confirmed by objective research methods are interpreted by the MME, and gave examples of the most common diagnoses when an insufficiently detailed description by doctors of the X-ray picture of the pathological process gives the MME grounds to speculate and make a deliberately wrong decision on the degree of fitness for military service. N. Ergard also spoke about cases from her practical work when the conclusion of a forensic medical expert became the basis for re-passing the MME and declaring a person unfit for military service.
Ihor Kolesnikov, member of the Center for Methodological Assistance and Coordination of the Volunteer Movement of Advocates for Legal Protection of Servicemen of the Ukrainian National Bar Association, emphasized that in the context of armed aggression, human rights guaranteed by the Constitution and the fulfillment of the duty to protect the country have become even more important.
At the same time, compliance with the requirements of the legislation in the field of mobilization measures, performance of military duty, and observance of the rights of persons liable for military service during the military medical commissions is a prerequisite and obligation of the authorized persons of the relevant state bodies (TCC, MME, etc.). Therefore, the activity of an attorney-at-law as a performer of the constitutional function of providing legal aid has become extremely important.
According to I. Kolesnikov, in these matters the lawyer should be proactive. Everything should be translated into writing, recorded in time, appeals to the TCC, MME, etc., and from the person to whom the lawyer provides legal aid. «We need an active position, which consists in providing all available documents and information about the state of health, notifying about the provision of additional data and documents after examination by the relevant doctors, and obtaining expert advice», - he said.
A lawyer who has entered into a legal aid agreement with a client has the right to independently engage an expert on a contractual basis to conduct an expert examination of the materials provided and obtain a specialist's opinion.
At the same time, it should be remembered that there is no universal measure or rule of defense, the lawyer says. Each case is individual by the nature of its constituent actions, events, documents and information.
Popular news
Legislation
UNBA initiatives to implement the Roadmap were supported by international experts
International experts who participated in the inaugural meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in advocacy and agreed to join it expressed their support for the initiative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
Legislation
How will the group responsible for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy operate?
The working group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy will operate at several levels: plenary meetings as a platform for adopting framework decisions, a coordination bureau for compiling documents and calendar control, and thematic subgroups for preparing norms and their justification. International experts will verify the results against European standards and «red lines».
Legislation
Advocacy is a responsible entity, not a critic of reform — V. Gvozdiy
The Roadmap on the Rule of Law is not a basis for restructuring the model of advocacy, but a framework for verifying and improving the already European-oriented system. At the same time, part of the work has already been done, so further progress should be made in the form of coordinated and practical decisions.
Legislation
Vatras on the implementation of the Roadmap: only advocates should create their own destiny
Work on implementing the Roadmap in relation to advocacy should be based on the participation of the professional community itself, and key tasks should be structured in such a way as to avoid mixing processes that differ in content and procedure.
Legislation
Roadmap and advocacy: working group holds first meeting
On January 2, the first organizational meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy reform took place. The event was devoted to agreeing on the framework for further work and exchanging the initial positions of the participants.
Self-government
BCU: NACP initiatives regarding the Bar are unconstitutional interference
The Bar Council of Ukraine has condemned the initiatives to reform the Bar proposed by the National Agency on Corruption Prevention as direct, gross and systematic interference by the executive branch in the activities of an independent constitutional institution.
Self-government
UNBA program for implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law published
In order to ensure the implementation of measures set out in the Roadmap on the Rule of Law, the Bar Council of Ukraine approved a program for its implementation in relation to the reform of advocacy.
Professional Conduct
The results of the CISA cannot be used in disciplinary proceedings against advocates – BCU
Materials obtained through covert investigative (search) activities involving interference in private communications cannot be transferred or used in disciplinary proceedings against advocates. This is because the Code of Criminal Procedure does not allow investigators or prosecutors to use such materials outside of criminal proceedings.
Publications
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…