Parliamentary instruments should not be used for private interests - statement of crime

Law enforcement agencies should assess whether an MP is using the parliamentary research tool in private interests. Involvement of the Research Service of the Verkhovna Rada in tasks not provided for in its Regulations has signs of corruption.
This was agreed upon by the members of the Bar Council of Ukraine (meeting is taking place today, February 21, in Uzhhorod) during the discussion of the situation around the publication of a parliamentary study containing conclusions about the inconsistency of some decisions of the Bar Council with the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law».
As a reminder, information about a parliamentary study «on current issues of the legal framework for the organization and operation of the Bar in Ukraine and bar self-government guaranteed by the state» prepared by the Research Service of the Verkhovna Rada has recently appeared on social media.
As it has become known, Larysa Kryvoruchko, whose right to practice law was terminated last year by the QDCB of Zakarpattia region, on January 30 appealed to MP Yuriy Kamelchuk with a request to initiate a parliamentary study of the current problem of state policy in the field of the Bar. The MP turned to the Research Service, which produced a 15-page study on the same day.
Based on this, the former lawyer demanded the termination of the activities of the bar, including the Qualification and Disciplinary Commissions of the Bar (QDCB), and also sent a parliamentary study to all courts of appeal, the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court to be taken into account when making court decisions.
The members of the BCU noted that since the registration of the person's appeal, its transfer to the Research Service, as well as the processing and production of the voluminous material took place on the same day, this gives reason to believe that the MP only formally registered the appeal of L. Kryvoruchko and transferred it to a state institution in order to legalize the previously prepared conclusion in the wording required by the interested parties.
The extraordinary speed of the study raises reasonable doubts about its objectivity, the lawyers believe, and may indicate prior coordination of actions, a coordinated scheme that creates risks of corruption and the use of parliamentary mechanisms to ensure private interests.
MP Yulia Yatsyk, who was present at the meeting, also assessed the strange behavior of her colleague. «I am outraged by such work aimed at undermining the authority of the bar community and the practice of law. Unfortunately, we have cases when such stories go beyond Ukraine, they are perceived very negatively by the international community», - she said.
The MP noted that the work of the Research Service does not allow for interference in the activities of existing bodies, but is only aimed at assisting MPs and preparing analytics on certain issues for internal use. Moreover, the Regulations on the Service clearly state that the conclusions are not the official position of the Verkhovna Rada. «In this case, we can talk about exceeding the powers of the MP», - said Y. Yatsyk.
Earlier, Volodymyr Vatras, a member of the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy, chairman of the subcommittee on organization and activities of the Bar and legal aid agencies, also studied this issue. He emphasized that the main tasks of the Research Service are research, information and analytical support of the activities of the Verkhovna Rada, its bodies, MPs of Ukraine, and parliamentary factions (deputy groups). The Service prepares written analytical and informational materials, including parliamentary research. The latter is a comprehensive analytical compilation related to the study of draft laws under consideration in the Verkhovna Rada, other topical issues of public policy, and the assessment of the effectiveness of the implementation of the adopted legislative act.
The Bar Council of Ukraine took note of the information. Taking into account the established circumstances, the UNBA filed a corresponding appeal to the State Bureau of Investigation, the Security Service of Ukraine, the National Agency for the Prevention of Corruption and the Prosecutor General's Office about the commission of a number of criminal offenses by a group of persons by prior conspiracy.
Popular news

Advocacy
Another conflict with the TCC: an advocate's leg was broken and his client jumped out of a window
On June 19, at the premises of the military medical commission, where a bus from the Krasnograd Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support delivered several people, an incident occurred involving the use of physical force against an advocate.

Advocacy
Independence of advocacy and accountability of expertise: different models, shared responsibility
Two different models of professional organization coexist in Ukraine: advocacy with established self-government and judicial and expert activities that remain under state control. How can approaches be balanced, the openness of expert opinions ensured, and effective interaction between specialists established?

Advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of t…
On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

Advocacy
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession
The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

Advocacy
Andriy Osipov appointed head of the Ukrainian State Film Agency
The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has appointed Andriy Osipov as head of the Ukrainian State Film Agency.

Advocacy
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure
The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

Advocacy
BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine will appeal to the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, Vasyl Malyuk, regarding the verification of information about «negative trends in the legal profession» disseminated by some media outlets on behalf of the SSU.

Advocacy
Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature
Thirteen member states of the Council of Europe have signed the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate, which was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on March 12, 2025. Four more countries will do so today. Ukraine is not among them.
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…