The BCU declared inadmissible the reorganization of the Odesa Law Academy
The Bar Council of Ukraine considers it appropriate to support the preservation of the National University Odesa Law Academy as an independent university, whose decades-long traditions and high standards of education and academic independence determine its distinctive uniqueness.
This decision was made on March 14 by the Bar Council of Ukraine, having considered the appeal of the Bar Council of Odesa Region, the Academic Council of the University and the staff of the Department of Organization of Judicial, Law Enforcement and Advocacy.
As a reminder, on February 12, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine issued Order No. 111-r on the proposal of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, according to which the Odesa Law Academy should be reorganized by joining the I. Mechnikov Odesa National University.
The university staff categorically disagreed with the Government's order, as there were no prerequisites for its adoption. The lack of objectivity, logical consistency, and clear arguments in this decision caused concern among the academic community and the public. The Bar Council of the region noted that the liquidation of the University would lead to the loss of a specialized law school, unique educational programs (in particular, in the field of advocacy), and would also destroy the established ties between the bar community and university legal science.
During the discussion of the issue at the meeting, UNBA member Oksana Kadenko reminded that the Odesa Law Academy is a unique educational institution that has been successfully operating since 1997. Until 2017, it was the only institution that had a special faculty of advocacy. Today, the university is one of the flagships of higher education in the scientific and educational space of Ukraine. Almost 8,000 students study at the university, and almost a thousand employees work there (including 333 doctors and candidates of sciences, 15 academicians and corresponding members of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine).
By many indicators, the university holds top positions among higher education institutions: in terms of the number of applicants, conditions for a safe educational process in the classroom format during martial law, graduate employment rate, etc. The university also ranks high in various rankings of higher education institutions. Among other things, the Odesa Law Academy is a member of the European Association of Universities (since 1998) and the European Public Law Association (since 2008), and a signatory to the Magna Charta Universitatum (since 2004).
«Recognition of the university by the scientific community, including on the world stage, is an important indicator and pride for the entire higher education of Ukraine», - said O. Kadenko. She also emphasized that for the bar it is crucial that the university is an important educational center that creates a favorable environment for human rights protection in Ukraine. Because the high quality of higher education, substantive scientific developments of the bar and absolute transparency to all forms of constructive inter-institutional cooperation make it an important tool for the Ukrainian National Bar Association to fulfill the tasks of bar self-government, and for Ukraine to form legal elites capable of building a state governed by the rule of law.
Pursuant to Article 44 of the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law», the tasks of the bar self-government, among other things, are to maintain a high professional level of lawyers and to create favorable conditions for the practice of law.
To implement these tasks, on April 7, 2017, the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the National University Odesa Law Academy signed a memorandum of cooperation. Pursuant to the agreement, numerous joint events are held, projects and programs are implemented to train legal professionals. UNBA experts and university researchers jointly develop proposals for draft laws and other regulatory acts, work training and state programs and action plans, strategies, etc., and conduct joint research and publishing activities. The university has introduced normative disciplines on the history of the formation and development of the Bar, opened thematic classrooms and auditoriums. Also, educational, industrial and pre-graduation practices were organized on the basis of regional bar councils in accordance with the schedule of the educational process and in compliance with the requirements of the current legislation of Ukraine.
Following the discussion of the issue, the Bar Council of Ukraine decided to support the National University Odesa Law Academy and the university staff in maintaining it as an independent higher education institution.
Also, the Vice President of the UNBA, BCU was instructed to address the President of Ukraine, the Cabinet of Ministers, the Ministry of Education and Science, and other bodies and institutions with a request to take measures to preserve the Odesa Law Academy as an independent higher education institution.
Popular news
Practice of law
BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases
In legal practice, it is not uncommon for court hearings in different cases to be scheduled at the same time. This raises the question: which case should the advocate attend first, and can the court interfere with this decision?
Edition
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions
The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.
Announcements
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun
The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».
Abroad
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?
Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.
Discussion
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability
On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.
Abroad
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues
The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel
The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.
Self-government
Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly
A unitary state requires uniform standards for access to the profession and disciplinary responsibility, which is why the Ukrainian National Bar Association acts as a professional organization. Accusations of monopoly are false, because public associations cannot replace professional self-government.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences