The BCU declared inadmissible the reorganization of the Odesa Law Academy
The Bar Council of Ukraine considers it appropriate to support the preservation of the National University Odesa Law Academy as an independent university, whose decades-long traditions and high standards of education and academic independence determine its distinctive uniqueness.
This decision was made on March 14 by the Bar Council of Ukraine, having considered the appeal of the Bar Council of Odesa Region, the Academic Council of the University and the staff of the Department of Organization of Judicial, Law Enforcement and Advocacy.
As a reminder, on February 12, the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine issued Order No. 111-r on the proposal of the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, according to which the Odesa Law Academy should be reorganized by joining the I. Mechnikov Odesa National University.
The university staff categorically disagreed with the Government's order, as there were no prerequisites for its adoption. The lack of objectivity, logical consistency, and clear arguments in this decision caused concern among the academic community and the public. The Bar Council of the region noted that the liquidation of the University would lead to the loss of a specialized law school, unique educational programs (in particular, in the field of advocacy), and would also destroy the established ties between the bar community and university legal science.
During the discussion of the issue at the meeting, UNBA member Oksana Kadenko reminded that the Odesa Law Academy is a unique educational institution that has been successfully operating since 1997. Until 2017, it was the only institution that had a special faculty of advocacy. Today, the university is one of the flagships of higher education in the scientific and educational space of Ukraine. Almost 8,000 students study at the university, and almost a thousand employees work there (including 333 doctors and candidates of sciences, 15 academicians and corresponding members of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine).
By many indicators, the university holds top positions among higher education institutions: in terms of the number of applicants, conditions for a safe educational process in the classroom format during martial law, graduate employment rate, etc. The university also ranks high in various rankings of higher education institutions. Among other things, the Odesa Law Academy is a member of the European Association of Universities (since 1998) and the European Public Law Association (since 2008), and a signatory to the Magna Charta Universitatum (since 2004).
«Recognition of the university by the scientific community, including on the world stage, is an important indicator and pride for the entire higher education of Ukraine», - said O. Kadenko. She also emphasized that for the bar it is crucial that the university is an important educational center that creates a favorable environment for human rights protection in Ukraine. Because the high quality of higher education, substantive scientific developments of the bar and absolute transparency to all forms of constructive inter-institutional cooperation make it an important tool for the Ukrainian National Bar Association to fulfill the tasks of bar self-government, and for Ukraine to form legal elites capable of building a state governed by the rule of law.
Pursuant to Article 44 of the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law», the tasks of the bar self-government, among other things, are to maintain a high professional level of lawyers and to create favorable conditions for the practice of law.
To implement these tasks, on April 7, 2017, the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the National University Odesa Law Academy signed a memorandum of cooperation. Pursuant to the agreement, numerous joint events are held, projects and programs are implemented to train legal professionals. UNBA experts and university researchers jointly develop proposals for draft laws and other regulatory acts, work training and state programs and action plans, strategies, etc., and conduct joint research and publishing activities. The university has introduced normative disciplines on the history of the formation and development of the Bar, opened thematic classrooms and auditoriums. Also, educational, industrial and pre-graduation practices were organized on the basis of regional bar councils in accordance with the schedule of the educational process and in compliance with the requirements of the current legislation of Ukraine.
Following the discussion of the issue, the Bar Council of Ukraine decided to support the National University Odesa Law Academy and the university staff in maintaining it as an independent higher education institution.
Also, the Vice President of the UNBA, BCU was instructed to address the President of Ukraine, the Cabinet of Ministers, the Ministry of Education and Science, and other bodies and institutions with a request to take measures to preserve the Odesa Law Academy as an independent higher education institution.
Popular news
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform
On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ukraine has signed the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer
Today, on 9 March, Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi signed the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. This makes our country the 28th to sign this important international treaty.
Discussion
Detention as a rule: the UNBA discussed standards for proving risks
The state interferes most intensively with the human right to liberty when choosing a preventive measure. At this stage, the standard of proof of risk becomes the actual measure of the real meaning of the presumption of innocence.
European integration
«Freedom or security» — a false formula: speech by L. Izovitova at the conference of bar presidents
Is the state protecting society from crime today, or is it gradually destroying the rule of law under the guise of this fight? These alarming trends were outlined by the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova, during her speech at the 54th European Conference of bar presidents.
Discussion
AI in advocacy and justice: ethics, regulation, limits of application
The Ukrainian National Bar Association held a roundtable discussion entitled «Artificial Intelligence in the цork of advocates: ethics, responsibility, legal process engineering». Participants discussed how artificial intelligence systems are already being used in the professional activities of advocates and where the ethical boundaries of what is permissible lie.
European integration
The Roadmap does not provide for the dismantling of the current model of advocacy — report
The Roadmap on the rule of law is not a law, directive, or other binding regulatory act and, accordingly, does not establish direct legal obligations regarding a specific institutional model of bar self-government.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates