Disciplinary responsibility of advocates: how the system works and why experience is important for experts

Unlike many professions, the Ukrainian advocacy has a developed system of self-regulation, particularly in matters of disciplinary responsibility. That is why the experience gained since 2012 can be useful for reforming forensic activities.
This was discussed during the round table «Standards of professional conduct for advocates and forensic experts: problematic issues and ways to resolve them», organized and conducted by the Ministry of Justice, the National Scientific Center «Institute of Forensic Expertise named after Prof. M. S. Bokarius», and the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
Within the thematic area «Problems of regulatory and legal regulation of forensic and advocacy activities; disciplinary responsibility of advocates and experts», Andriy Misiats, the acting Head of the High Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar, who spoke about the key features of the model of disciplinary responsibility of advocates, recent changes in the procedure and principles followed by the bar self-government to ensure fairness and trust in the profession.
According to him, the disciplinary practice of the Bar already has a solid regulatory framework and many years of experience based on ethical standards. In this context, he emphasized the importance of combining legislative requirements with moral and ethical norms, as enshrined in the Rules of Professional Conduct for Lawyers.
Recently, the Bar Council of Ukraine has introduced changes to the procedure for considering disciplinary cases. It has become more transparent and convenient for participants. In particular, advocates and complainants have been given the opportunity to familiarize themselves with case materials through cloud storage, participate in meetings online, and commissions have introduced a mixed format for meetings. A. Misiats noted that this has increased the effectiveness of the HQDCB as a quasi-judicial body.
He recalled that an advocate can only be held accountable after all stages of the procedure have been followed: filing a complaint, reviewing it, opening or refusing to open disciplinary proceedings, considering the case on its merits, and adopting a decision. The current law provides for only three types of disciplinary sanctions: warning, suspension of the right to practice law for a period of one month to one year, and deprivation of the right with exclusion from the Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine. The law does not provide for other types of punishment, such as fines or community service.
Any decision of the regional QDCB may be appealed to the HQDCB or to a court. In doing so, the HQDCB has the right not only to overturn or uphold decisions, but also to amend them. This practice has been confirmed by court decisions, including cases heard by the Supreme Court.
Separately, the head of the High Disciplinary Bar Commission drew attention to the typical problem of abuse of disciplinary complaints by procedural opponents. According to him, such attempts are used to put pressure on an advocate or to remove him or her from a case. The Commission carefully examines such complaints and does not allow them to be used as a tool of unfair competition.
In conclusion, A. Misiats emphasized that disciplinary responsibility must be not only lawful but also fair, and that the experience of the advocacy in building such a system could serve as an example for improving professional regulation in the judicial and expert spheres.
Popular news

Legislation
Those who equate advocates with clients will be fined – law passed
Public identification of an advocate with a client to whom such advocate provides professional legal assistance will become an administrative offense, and forms of interference in the activities of an advocate, for which liability is provided for in Article 397 of the Criminal Code, are detailed.

Self-government
The HCJ continues to ignore the legal deadlines for forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ
The High Council of Justice continues to violate the statutory deadlines for forming a new competition commission to select members of the Competition Commission of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

Advocacy
UNBA asked the UBA about the facts of the alleged violations of lawyers' rights
The National Bar Association of Ukraine is concerned about information regarding violations of the professional rights of advocates and guarantees of advocacy, which was disseminated on June 16 by the UPO «Ukrainian Bar Association». This issue will be discussed at a meeting of the Bar Council of Ukraine.

Advocacy
Another conflict with the TCC: an advocate's leg was broken and his client jumped out of a window
On June 19, at the premises of the military medical commission, where a bus from the Krasnograd Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support delivered several people, an incident occurred involving the use of physical force against an advocate.

Advocacy
Independence of advocacy and accountability of expertise: different models, shared responsibility
Two different models of professional organization coexist in Ukraine: advocacy with established self-government and judicial and expert activities that remain under state control. How can approaches be balanced, the openness of expert opinions ensured, and effective interaction between specialists established?

Advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of t…
On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

Advocacy
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession
The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

Advocacy
National Police conducted searches of advocates without permission from investigating judge
A search of an advocate's home is not just an investigative measure, but a potential interference with attorney-client privilege, which is protected by law and international standards. It is all the more alarming when such actions are carried out without a court order, at night, and without clear justification of urgency. This new case once again raises the question: are exceptions becoming the rule and guarantees becoming a formality?
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…