BCU recognized an attempt to convene illegal conference of advocates of Kyiv City as illegitimate

Regions
10:05 Wed 13.12.17 2899 Reviews
Print

The Bar Council of Ukraine recognized that the meeting of lawyers, which took place in Kyiv on October 7, 2017, fell short from the definition of a conference of advocates of the region. Decisions adopted at such a meeting have no legal consequences.

This is stated in the BCU decision No. 227 as of November 15, 2017, "Concerning issues that arose in connection with the meeting called 'Reporting and Election Conference of Kyiv City advocates' on October 7, 2017.

The relevant meeting was held without representational quota set by the Bar Council of Ukraine, as well as without approved procedure of nomination and election of conference delegates, and without approved Rules of Procedure. Thus, the meeting did not conform to the provision of the Law 'On the Bar and Practice of Law' (Arts. 47, 55) and binding decisions of the BCU.

Besides that, the initiator of the said meeting, Inna Rafalska, had no right to practice law and participate advocates' self-government, because her license was suspended on 17 August 2017. This is another proof that she assumed powers of the Chair of the Kyiv City Bar Council, by way of sending to the Bar Council of Ukraine the 'Protocol of the Reporting and Election Conference of Kyiv City Advocates as of October 7, 2017.'

In connection therewith, the BCU, by way of its another decision, refused to issue Mrs. Rafalska the password for administrative access to Kyiv City Bar Council section of Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine, since she was not properly authorized.

The Bar Council of Ukraine also decided to address law enforcement agencies and courts in Kyiv City to refute the information provided by Mrs. Rafalska in her letters to them. She also baselessly claimed that Kyiv City Bar Council of Kyiv was elected anew, and called offal the powers of attorney issued to Petro Riabenko, incumbent Chair of the Kyiv City Bar Council. Also, BCU continually asserts that excerpts from URAU issued and signed by Mrs. Rafalska are null and void.

The BCU maintains that Kyiv Bar Council was formed at the conference of advocates of the region on October 8, 2016, and continues its work without any interruptions. The second-level URAU administrator is Petrj Riabenko, incumbent Chair of the Kyiv City Bar Council.

Given that, the BCU also decided to address QDCB of Kyiv City with complaints against inappropriate behavior of  some advocates, that, contrary to the law and decisions of the BCU, knowing full-well about the legitimate status of the Kyiv City Bar Council and QDCB of Kyiv City, agreed to be allegedly elected to the advocates' self-government at a meeting that did not have the status of the conference.

Popular news

Ukraine could be the first to implement a European mechanism for the protection of advocates. What’s holding it back?

Guarantees of the practice of law

Ukraine could be the first to implement a European mechanism for the protection of advocates. What’s holding it back?

Ukraine has a chance to be the first country to ratify the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer. Political support for this exists, but the government’s legislative package has not yet been submitted to parliament. Meanwhile, the number of violations of advocates’ rights is on the rise.

18:32 Wed 19.08.26 187
How can an advocate verify that work has been completed if the client refuses to sign the report?

Educational events

How can an advocate verify that work has been completed if the client refuses to sign the report?

When billing by the hour, the primary document for determining the fee may be a detailed report on the time spent by the advocate and the work performed. To prevent the client from withholding payment, the contract should specify in advance the procedure for submitting and approving such a report.

11:14 Wed 19.08.26 197
The BCU took note of the public appeal from the HCJ

Self-government

The BCU took note of the public appeal from the HCJ

The Bar Council of Ukraine has determined that, given the current security situation, it is objectively impossible to hold, in accordance with the procedure established by the Law «On the advocacy and the practice of law», meetings of advocates, regional conferences of advocates and the Congress of Ukrainian Advocates, including for the purpose of electing two members of the High Council of Justice under the quota allocated to the Congress of Ukrainian Advocates.

17:22 Tue 18.08.26 101
The BCU has launched a digital project «Wall of Remembrance and Honor»

War

The BCU has launched a digital project «Wall of Remembrance and Honor»

The Bar Council of Ukraine has adopted a resolution to launch the digital project «Wall of Remembrance and Honor». To this end, the UNBA is beginning to collect information on advocates and paralegals who lost their lives as a result of the Russian Federation’s armed aggression against Ukraine.

14:12 Tue 18.08.26 100
Energy law: the UNBA and the ADMGE have agreed to cooperate

Interaction

Energy law: the UNBA and the ADMGE have agreed to cooperate

Advocates will deepen their professional expertise in the field of energy law, and participants in the distributed and flexible generation market will have greater opportunities to obtain professional legal assistance.

14:31 Fri 07.08.26 194
Where does an advocate's time go and what do they get in return

Educational events

Where does an advocate's time go and what do they get in return

To assess balance in life, it’s worth identifying the areas where the most effort, time, and money are directed, and then determining what a person receives in return: income, respect, support, love, a sense of significance or the fulfillment of an important idea.

10:43 Thu 06.08.26 117
The SC has clarified the different ways to respond to a lawyer's request that is ignored

Court practice

The SC has clarified the different ways to respond to a lawyer's request that is ignored

If there is no response to an advocate’s request, the advocate has the right to file a petition with the Bar Association to hold the person administratively liable. An advocate may challenge the failure to provide information necessary for the provision of legal assistance on behalf of the client, rather than in their own name.

16:59 Mon 03.08.26 119
The highest degree of formality is appropriate for an advocate in court – an etiquette expert

Educational events

The highest degree of formality is appropriate for an advocate in court – an etiquette expert

An advocate’s behavior and appearance must be appropriate to the circumstances in which they practice their profession. What may be perceived as a warm greeting between old acquaintances could, during a first meeting, come across as overly familiar and a violation of personal boundaries.

17:27 Fri 31.07.26 105

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл