There is no prohibition for advocates to take part in professional development activities conducted by other regional bar councils
The new Order of Professional Development of Advocates is becoming less and less intimidating for advocates, especially those who have already been trained under the new rules and have learned from their own experience the convenience and ease of the process. However, there are still single colleagues who are openly trying to manipulate the minds of others in a non-constructive way.
"Both UNBA and the Higher School of Advocacy continue to provide clarification on major changes, both individually and through publications in the media and in the training of regional bar self-government bodies responsible for the professional development of advocates of the regions," - says Deputy Head of UNBA, BCU Valentyn Gvozdii.
According to him, under the new rules, regional bar councils:
- are operators of professional development of advocates in their region that do not require accreditation;
- are obliged to organize, on their own or in cooperation with the UNBA Higher School of Advocacy or other operators, professional development activities at the regional level (at least three events per year and with a total duration of at least ten hours).
At the same time, the events for advocates remain free of charge. However, the new order now also regulates the procedure for conducting and remunerative measures, which can be carried out in addition to the free ones. The schedule of all events is published on the UNBA's official website and is announced in the regions and on the website of the UNBA accreditation center. The new rules have no impact on the number or theme of such measures.
The only difference with regard to participation in such activities is in the order of registration. Now you need to do this on a single accreditation center platform online. This mechanism is very convenient for the advocate, as well as unloading the regional bar councils, and today we have exceptionally positive feedback from both the advocates and the operators.
At the same time, in some regions, there have been situations where advocates from other regions seem to have been denied registration in free activities conducted by regional bar councils.
There are cases of failure, but the reasons are always different:
1. The advocate is not registered in the Single Register of Advocates of Ukraine. That is, such a person is not an advocate.
2. The number of seats to the event is limited. It is logical that regional bar council gives priority to the advocates of its region, because it is at the expense of the contributions of the local community that the activity of the bar self-government is carried out.
3. The advocate is registered for the event by mistake. This happens. In such a case, cancellation of the registration for the participation takes place by mutual consent during a telephone call for confirmation of participation.
4. Provocations with "refusals" are created deliberately to mislead the society on social network with a "betrayal'. We understand who is doing what and why, and such actions indicate both a complete misunderstanding of the new rules and a lack of respect for our colleagues and the disregard for the rules of professional conduct.
"There is no prohibition for advocates to take part in professional development activities conducted by other regional bar councils. The registration of advocates from other regions is always at the discretion of the event organizer," - stated Valentyn Gvozdii.
The UNBA Deputy Head advises advocates who want to attend a free seminar in the region other than where their main workplace is located, to focus primarily on the schedule of free UNBA seminars taking place in different regions. Such events are intended for a larger audience and are conducted at the expense of UNBA for all Ukrainian advocates, not just for advocates of a particular region.
For example, such a seminar was held in Odessa on July 27, and was attended by almost 1,000 advocates from different regions of the country.
"Respecting the powers and principles of independence of the regional bodies of bar self-government, the UNBA maintains that the Bar of Ukraine is a unified national institution. We have never supported any divisions between regions and the ideas of "federalization" of the bar, which, by the way, have been proposed by the draft law No. 9055. However, the ideologists of such "changes" have been defeated, and it is obvious that attempts to spread the next myths about some barriers between bar communities of different regions are a phantom pain for those who have had the idea of dividing the bar,” - commented Valentyn Gvozdii.
The Order of Professional Development of Advocates
Schedule of UNBA training activities for the second half of 2019
Popular news
Interaction
Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation
Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Discussion
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails
The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».
Rule of Law Roadmap
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change
On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform
On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ukraine has signed the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer
Today, on 9 March, Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi signed the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. This makes our country the 28th to sign this important international treaty.
European integration
The subgroup on European integration held its inaugural meeting
On March 5, the Ukrainian National Bar Association hosted a meeting of the subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in terms of reforming the advocacy sector, entitled «European integration, international practice and digitalization».
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates