Draft law No. 1008 can not be adopted without the conclusion of Venetian Commission - BCU
Draft law No.1008 «On making changes in some Ukrainian laws about self-governing judicial bodies» can not be adopted without the conclusion of European Commission «To democracy through the law», as consider Ukrainian advocates.
That is why Bar Council of Ukraine has appealed to the subjects of the appeal to Venetian Commission, particularly to PACE, European Council and SSBE, with the letter about the need of sending the draft law No.1008 to the european expertise.
This appeal was posted on the website of National Association of Advocates of Ukraine.
In this document is mentioned, that by consolidating european and euro atlantic course on the Constitutional level, Ukraine has committed to implement reforms, including judicial one, in correspondence to european principles as stability and effectiveness of democratic institutions, the rule of law and respect to human rights and fundamental freedoms.
Thus, since 2014, according to the Agreement between Ukraine and EU, recommendations of European Council, PACE and according to the evaluation of Venetian Commission, Ukraine has adopted the legislation, including constitutional changes in the part of justice and law «On judiciary and statutes of judges», «On Higher Council of Justice». Therefore, further changes in judicial bodies are impossible without expert evaluation of these international institutions, emphasize in BCU.
«Conclusions and recommendations of Venetian Commission on constitutional law’s questions is a certain standard, according to which relevance of legal basis of the state’s government to european standards of democracy, protection of human rights and the rule of law is evaluated»-says in the appeal. Висновки й рекомендації Венеціанської Комісії з конституційно-правових питань є певним
Other than that, advocates’ community emphasizes, that accelerated process of making changes to the legislation gives serious challenges to the abidance of constitutional country’s principles and threats the decrease of already achieved level of European Council’s standards in the area of justice.
«Official position EU representatives in Ukraine and Embassy of Canada in Ukraine about the draft law No.1008 on self-governing judicial bodies and the draft law No.1032 on the reformation of prosecution bodies, which was published on September 11th 2019, already signalize about that. Particularly, key international partners have noted, that there are «risks, that unreasoned steps in changing the current legislation, which is regulating judiciary, advocacy, prosecutors, question Ukraine’s reliability as a partner in key european institutions». In this document is shown the need to «start thorough consultative process on earlier mentioned draft laws and invite relevant experts in law, civil society and international community»,-says in the appeal.
We remind, that earlier in the appeal to the Parliament and President of Ukraine BCU called to revise the draft law No.1008 with consideration of lawyers’ community position.
Popular news
Abroad
UNBA office opens in EU capital
To strengthen the institutional presence of the Ukrainian advocacy community at the European level, an office of the Ukrainian National Bar Association has been opened in Brussels (Belgium), which will serve as a permanent platform for dialogue with European partners.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Impunity for public stigmatization of advocates violates the constitutional right to defense
The prohibition of identifying an advocate with a client is an international standard enshrined in the Law «On advocacy and legal practice». However, without accountability, this guarantee does not work, which poses a direct threat to the realization of the right to defense and the principle of adversarial proceedings.
Legislation
Inheritance of a share in joint property and more: advocates have made comments
In the event of the death of one of the subjects of joint shared ownership, the shares of each of the co-owners in the joint shared ownership shall be deemed equal, unless otherwise agreed between them, by law, or by a court decision.
Legislation
Implementation of the Roadmap: the composition of the working group ensures a high level of expertise
The composition of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in relation to advocacy demonstrates the high institutional level of the experts involved by the Ukrainian National Bar Association in the formation of a package of decisions.
Legislation
UNBA initiatives to implement the Roadmap were supported by international experts
International experts who participated in the inaugural meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in advocacy and agreed to join it expressed their support for the initiative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
Legislation
How will the group responsible for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy operate?
The working group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy will operate at several levels: plenary meetings as a platform for adopting framework decisions, a coordination bureau for compiling documents and calendar control, and thematic subgroups for preparing norms and their justification. International experts will verify the results against European standards and «red lines».
Legislation
Advocacy is a responsible entity, not a critic of reform — V. Gvozdiy
The Roadmap on the Rule of Law is not a basis for restructuring the model of advocacy, but a framework for verifying and improving the already European-oriented system. At the same time, part of the work has already been done, so further progress should be made in the form of coordinated and practical decisions.
Legislation
Vatras on the implementation of the Roadmap: only advocates should create their own destiny
Work on implementing the Roadmap in relation to advocacy should be based on the participation of the professional community itself, and key tasks should be structured in such a way as to avoid mixing processes that differ in content and procedure.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine