Once the land market is open, the law abolishing the advocate's monopoly could deprive millions of Ukrainians of protection from raiders

This was emphasized by UNBA representative in the Verkhovna Rada Mykhaylo Dyadenko during the meeting of the Committee on Legal Policy of the Verkhovna Rada. The Committee considered the draft law No. 1013 on amending the Constitution of Ukraine (abolishing the advocate's monopoly).
On behalf of the lawyer community, Mykhaylo Dyadenko appealed to the people's deputies and urged them to refrain from adopting the document as it is now.
“Three years ago, the Verkhovna Rada decided on the so-called advocate's monopoly, giving the credit to the conclusion of the Venice Commission. Starting only this year, this decision started to be implemented. And without having seen the results of this decision, the question about the abolition of the advocate's monopoly arises. UNBA has repeatedly called for a broad dialogue on this issue, but the Committee has not heard the warnings of more than 50,000 advocates”, - Mykhaylo Dyadenko said.
The advocate warned the parliamentarians - the provisions of draft law No1013 will lead to violations of constitutional human rights, first of all, of the right to defense.
“The land market is planned to be open in the near future. Given the widespread use of raids by entire clans in Ukraine, the Verkhovna Rada may leave millions of Ukrainian citizens without legal protection of adequate quality. And such a hasty decision to abolish advocate's monopoly can lead to very negative results. Therefore, on behalf of the UNBA, I once again urge the PDs to postpone the consideration of this issue, to hold a wide dialogue and only after that to make a well-considered decision,” - the UNBA representative said.
At the same time, the Head of the UNBA Committee for Human Rights Anna Kolesnyk sent a letter to the Head of the Committee on Legal Policy Andrii Kostin urging to recognize the draft law No1013 to be returned to the subject of the legislative initiative.
She outlined a number of risks posed by this legislative initiative and called the abolition of the advocate's monopoly inadmissible in a European state of rule of law.
“The cancellation of exclusive representation in court can lead to the fact that any person will be able to represent before the court, in spite of having no legal education. This, in turn, will adversely affect the quality of the judiciary and will reduce the public's confidence in the judiciary. In addition, the abolition of the exclusive representation by advocates in the courts will lead to a more expensive judicial process for the state, since the hearing of cases will be delayed deliberately, as the representative will not bear any responsibility for it. It is also possible that a representative without proper education, qualifications due to ignorance of all the intricacies of the process, inability to gather evidence, etc. might also delay the trial, ” - the letter said.
The Secretary of the Parliamentary Committee on Legal Policy Oleg Makarov generally proposed to exclude draft law No. 1013 from the agenda of the committee. Only 4 PDs voted in favor of excluding this issue from the profile committee, 13 voted against, and two abstained. Therefore, this issue remains on the agenda.
As a result of its consideration, the Committee recommended the draft law to be approved by the Verkhovna Rada. 17 voted in favour, 3 against, one abstained.
Popular news

Advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of t…
On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

Advocacy
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession
The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

Advocacy
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure
The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

Advocacy
BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine will appeal to the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, Vasyl Malyuk, regarding the verification of information about «negative trends in the legal profession» disseminated by some media outlets on behalf of the SSU.

Advocacy
Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature
Thirteen member states of the Council of Europe have signed the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate, which was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on March 12, 2025. Four more countries will do so today. Ukraine is not among them.

Advocacy
BCU initiates resolution of the issue of visits by advocates to convicted persons
Article 110 of the Criminal Enforcement Code guarantees convicted persons confidentiality of meetings with their advocate. One of the important elements is the possibility to communicate with an advocate in a room without a solid partition. In practice, this provision of the law is systematically violated.

Advocacy
Advocates, academics, and experts examine problems in forensic examination (video)
The Ukrainian National Bar Association, in cooperation with leading scientific and research institutes of forensic expertise, organized a round table on expert support for legal practice.

Advocacy
Does the mobilization of a lawyer violate the human right to defense - conclusion of the Supreme Court
Article 335 of the CPC provides for the suspension of court proceedings only in cases where the accused was called up for military service during mobilization. However, this provision does not apply to the mobilization of a defense counsel.
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…