UNBA Committee on International Law Commentary on the Ratification of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court by Ukraine
The UNBA International Law Committee has repeatedly stated that the advocacy community should support the idea of ratifying the Rome Statute and be ready for the new challenges it faces in connection with the armed conflict, in particular being able to provide legal protection for victims of war crimes and crime committed in eastern Ukraine and the Crimea. [1]
However, recently in an interview with Glavcom [2], Justice Minister of Ukraine Denys Maliuska stated that Ukraine had already ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: "There are no violations of the Constitution. It provides for the ratification of the Rome Statute. And in general, it has been ratified, but with reservations", the Minister said.
According to the official, the state should conduct a dialogue on the issue of ratification of the statute and consider that a large part of society does not understand the risks and benefits that the ICC can give, as it is influenced by all sorts of myths: "It will, of course, take some time and dialogue. But this topic is so heated that one in five considers himself a specialist. In fact, a very limited number of people understand the real consequences and mechanisms, but a great number of people stand against it. So, here are more myths than realities", added Denys Maliuska.
The minister's statement has caused widespread public outcry. Some of the human rights activists were frankly surprised at the position of the head of the Ministry of Justice [3] and recalled that although Ukraine recognized the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court ad hoc, it had not ratified the Statute. Thus, the ICC has jurisdiction over the territory of Ukraine on the basis of statements made by it in 2014 and 2015, however, this is not sufficient to enjoy the rights of the State party to the Statute.
The UNBA International Law Committee deems it appropriate to invite the Minister and all indifferent experts to join with our advocates in discussing the ratification of the Rome Statute and the implementation of international criminal law in the national legal system.
We recommend you to read the interview of Maksym Tymochko, a member of the UNBA Committee on International Law, on the prospects of war crimes investigations by the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court.
Text and photos were prepared by a team of UNBA committee coordinators.Popular news
Advocacy
FLA needs urgent help, - Valentyn Gvozdiy
Twelve years of existence of the free legal aid system in Ukraine is enough to understand the inability of the Ministry of Justice to effectively manage this area.
Advocacy
The Ombudsman is concerned about the state of the FLA system
The Secretariat of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights is ready to join the development of proposals for amendments to the legal acts developed by the Ukrainian National Bar Association that will improve the functioning of the free legal aid system.
Advocacy
Ombudsman to provide legal aid with support of UNBA - pilot project
The Office of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights has launched a pilot project to provide professional legal aid to citizens in five regions of Ukraine.
Advocacy
Another model should be introduced for the FLA system, - Lidiya Izovitova
Monitoring of the current state of functioning of the legal aid system shows the existence of significant and conceptual problems in the implementation of this assistance in Ukraine.
Advocacy
Violation of media guarantees of advocacy is being studied by the UNBA
An open appeal of the Ukrainian National Bar Association's Committee on Information Policy and Interaction with the Mass Media to the advocates.
Advocacy
Lawyers are offered to be booked - amendments to draft law No. 10449
In their amendments to the draft law on strengthening mobilization, MPs propose to provide for the booking of lawyers. The goal is to prevent disruptions of court hearings.
Advocacy
E-Court failures violate constitutional guarantees – UNBA
In recent days, the Ukrainian National Bar Association has received numerous reports from lawyers about technical failures in the operation of the Electronic Court subsystem. In particular, the complaints relate to the inability to log in to the electronic office, which restricts advocates in exercising their procedural rights, in particular, to submit documents and participate in court hearings in the videoconference mode.
Advocacy
Fixed fee: time of work is important for reimbursement of attorney's fees – SC
The procedure for calculating the hourly fee differs from the fixed fee, which does not take into account the actual time spent. However, in both cases, they are taken into account when deciding on the reimbursement of legal aid expenses.
Publications
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences
Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…