UNBA Committee on International Law Commentary on the Ratification of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court by Ukraine
The UNBA International Law Committee has repeatedly stated that the advocacy community should support the idea of ratifying the Rome Statute and be ready for the new challenges it faces in connection with the armed conflict, in particular being able to provide legal protection for victims of war crimes and crime committed in eastern Ukraine and the Crimea. [1]
However, recently in an interview with Glavcom [2], Justice Minister of Ukraine Denys Maliuska stated that Ukraine had already ratified the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: "There are no violations of the Constitution. It provides for the ratification of the Rome Statute. And in general, it has been ratified, but with reservations", the Minister said.
According to the official, the state should conduct a dialogue on the issue of ratification of the statute and consider that a large part of society does not understand the risks and benefits that the ICC can give, as it is influenced by all sorts of myths: "It will, of course, take some time and dialogue. But this topic is so heated that one in five considers himself a specialist. In fact, a very limited number of people understand the real consequences and mechanisms, but a great number of people stand against it. So, here are more myths than realities", added Denys Maliuska.
The minister's statement has caused widespread public outcry. Some of the human rights activists were frankly surprised at the position of the head of the Ministry of Justice [3] and recalled that although Ukraine recognized the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court ad hoc, it had not ratified the Statute. Thus, the ICC has jurisdiction over the territory of Ukraine on the basis of statements made by it in 2014 and 2015, however, this is not sufficient to enjoy the rights of the State party to the Statute.
The UNBA International Law Committee deems it appropriate to invite the Minister and all indifferent experts to join with our advocates in discussing the ratification of the Rome Statute and the implementation of international criminal law in the national legal system.
We recommend you to read the interview of Maksym Tymochko, a member of the UNBA Committee on International Law, on the prospects of war crimes investigations by the Office of the Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court.
Text and photos were prepared by a team of UNBA committee coordinators.Popular news
Greetings
The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice
Denis Maslov’s many years of experience as a advocate, his work as a judge and his tenure as chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine’s Committee on legal policy have given him a deep understanding of how the legal system functions and the challenges it faces.
Legislation
The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy
The section on advocacy and legal aid in the draft anti-corruption strategy for 2026–2030 goes beyond the scope of anti-corruption policy and is inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU
An advocate’s membership in the UNBA is an element of professional status arising by virtue of law, rather than a voluntary private membership in an association. Therefore, failure to disclose it in a declaration should not automatically lead to the conclusion of unethical conduct or the concealment of a private interest.
Legislation
The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer
The ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer must be accompanied by targeted amendments to legislation to strengthen safeguards for advocates, but should not be used as a pretext for dismantling the self-governing model of advocacy.
Interaction
A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative
On June 24, as part of European Legal Sovereignty Day, which took place in Brussels, the Manifesto for a Referential of Human Guarantee in the Legal Use of AI was presented.
Court practice
Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026
During martial law, the focus of administrative proceedings shifted: in addition to tax disputes, cases involving access to public information, personal data protection, and challenges to regulatory acts, the docket now includes mobilization issues, challenges to decisions by the TCC and the Special Purpose Commission, disputes regarding deferrals, military service, sanctions, and new administrative restrictions.
Court practice
Lidiya Izovitova identified 7 challenges in administrative proceedings for advocates
The predictability of judicial practice, jurisdictional disputes, cassation filters, enforcement of judgments against the state, the burden of proof, written proceedings, and guarantees for the practice of law remain key issues in administrative justice for advocates.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Preparations for the ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer are in the final stages
On June 9, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on legal policy held a working meeting to prepare for the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer. The Ministry of Justice and the Ukrainian National Bar Association agreed on approaches to draft laws regarding the ratification and implementation of the Convention. Participants have been given 10 days to prepare the draft laws that will be submitted for consideration.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates