Meeting of the President of UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova with the Head of the Project "Judiciary and Society in Ukraine" of the Center for International Legal Cooperation Esther de Roy
UNBA hosted a meeting of UNBA/BCU President Lidiya Izovitova with the Head of the Project "Judiciary and Society in Ukraine" of the Center for International Legal Cooperation (Netherlands) Esther de Roy. UNBA was also represented by UNBA, BCU Vice-President Valentyn Gvozdiy, Chair of the UNBA International Relations Committee Ivan Grechkivsky, Chair of the UNBA Committee on Independence of Justice and Judiciary Oleksiy Malovatskyi.
The topic of the conversation was the possible directions of cooperation between the UNBA, and the Project devoted to growing public confidence in the courts and the interaction of participants in proceedings in the interests of independent and fair justice.
"Since the Bar is classified as a part of the justice system by the Constitution, we closely observe what problems arise in the judiciary and have been dealing with these issues for a long time," Lydia Izovitova explained about her own 16 years of experience in the High Council of Justice.
According to Esther de Roy, in recent years, pilot projects have been implemented in the regions of Ukraine, in which judges and advocates were involved, in particular, in the Odessa region. This project is "Rules for the Organization of Effective Civil Proceedings" and "Rules for the organization of Criminal Proceedings", which the Bar Council of Ukraine at one time refused to support due to the existing risks for carrying out of effective advocacy in accordance with these recommendations.
"We agree that we will work together and be jointly responsible for the documents that we will be guided by. When we analyzed the previous draft, we did not understand who was more frivolous among the developers of these documents: judges who wanted to simplify procedural rules in their favor, or advocates. On our part, I can assure you that we will not allow our final product to be not in favor of independent justice", said Lidiya Izovitova.
She stressed that when developing any recommendations, the willingness of the parties to the proceedings should be taken into account to avoid rules favoring certain parties. "When we talk about guidelines, this is one thing, and when we talk about working in a practical area, it is another. Disciplinary bodies have been established in the Bar that can consider complaints against advocates for abuse of rights. As for judges, there are such bodies, but they have ceased to work, and today there is a basis for unpunished abuse in the processes by judges," Lidiya Izovitova stressed.
As an example, she cited the court's decision to take a person into custody because the defenders of this person filed too many recusals, and also mentioned other practical cases of obvious violations.
For her part, the Head of the "Judiciary and Society in Ukraine" Project of the Center for International Legal Cooperation, who is also Deputy Head of the Amsterdam District Court for International Cooperation and the Rule of Law, Esther de Roy offered cooperation on a wide range of issues of the judiciary in Ukraine. "We must jointly identify the needs and opportunities in the justice system that need to be improved. We have the Convention for the Protection of Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Article 6 "Fair Trial", which provides for the rights to a fair trial within a reasonable time," the project manager said.
For his part, Oleksiy Malovatskyi recalled the experience of the Project's cooperation with the High Council of Justice and proposed that the developments that international experts currently plan to implement together with the UNBA should be implemented as the law and take into account the position of the Bar in dialogue with the legislator.
It should be noted that this is the second meeting of the UNBA leadership with representatives of the project "Judiciary and Society in Ukraine" of the Center for International Legal Cooperation.
The project seeks to change the relationship between the judiciary and society, focusing on the development of judicial self-government and the development of self-government in the judicial system, increasing the professional level judges and court staff.
The project's activities are focused on the analysis of fundamental values of justice and the foundations of public confidence in the judiciary, conducting trainings on quality assurance and proper justification of court decisions that will result in proper perception of court decisions by citizens; round tables on efficiency, timeliness, transparency and the expected course of court hearings; seminars to develop recommendations for improving the judicial process, expert discussions and knowledge exchange between the judicial communities of Ukraine and the Netherlands.
Details about the project can be viewed on the Center's websitePopular news
Educational events
An advocate's meeting with a client outside the office: how to conduct it without giving away too much
If a client suggests meeting in a public place, keep in mind that any name or amount mentioned aloud could be overheard by bystanders. Therefore, it’s important to plan ahead regarding the table, seating arrangements, and the scope of the conversation.
Legislation
The UNBA explained what could undermine the plan to introduce plea agreements
Information regarding who pays whom, how much, and on what grounds under a plea agreement must be made public. However, as long as this information is classified as a state secret or personal data, the court will continue to be able to close proceedings and restrict access to judgments.
Interaction
The UNBA and the German Institute for Eastern Law will prepare joint legal opinions
Ukrainian advocates and German legal scholars will jointly prepare comparative legal studies, expert opinions, and professional events. The UNBA reached this agreement with the Institute for Eastern European Law in Regensburg, which has been researching the laws of Central and Eastern European countries for nearly 70 years.
Legislation
Proceedings against military personnel following AWOL require clear deadlines — UNBA
A soldier’s return to duty after AWOL does not necessarily mean the end of criminal proceedings. To ensure that the case does not remain at the pretrial investigation stage, a clear procedure for the investigator and prosecutor is required.
Educational events
A one-time payment or royalties? Students were briefed on changes to copyright agreements
As a general rule, property rights to a work created by an employee are transferred to the employer, but the author retains the right to remuneration. European law requires that this remuneration be based on the actual income generated by the work, rather than being limited to a one-time payment.
Legislation
The UNBA warned of the risk of customs barriers for Ukrainian paper and furniture
Ukraine’s anti-deforestation rules are intended to preserve export access to the EU market. However, without paper and furniture on the list of goods, without effective sanctions, and with enforcement beginning only in 2030, these rules could hinder that goal.
Legislation
Fines for loud exhaust — based on a standardized measurement method — UNBA
Measures to combat intentionally loud exhaust noises are justified, especially during wartime. However, as long as the law does not specify which noise standard to apply or how to measure it on the road, this new liability can be neither fair nor effective.
Educational events
What should an advocate do if a client is under severe stress?
An advocate may encounter a client in a state of acute stress, when the person is looking at the other person but does not see them. Before discussing the case, it is important to bring the client back to reality: establish contact, ask a few questions, and engage their senses.
Publications
Vasyl Kolishnyi, «Law and Business» Supporting mental health should become part of the professional culture of the Bar, - H. Udovenko
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection