The Ukrainian National Bar Association became a signatory of the Resolution on the need for transparency in the awarding and application of the death penalty
The Ukrainian National Bar Association is one of 53 Bar Associations from around the world which signed a resolution on the need for transparency in the awarding and application of the death penalty. The draft resolution was presented during the 8th World Congress against the Death Penalty, which occurred on November 15-18, 2022, in Berlin. The event brought together more than 1,000 participants from 90 countries - human rights defenders and public figures working to abolish the death penalty. The congress was organized by the partners of the Council of Europe: the Paris-based NGO "Together Against the Death Penalty" and the World Coalition Against the Death Penalty.
During the event, participants will have a unique opportunity to exchange views on furthering the abolition of the death penalty and opposing any attempts to restore the death penalty where it has already been abolished. Considerable attention was also paid to the lawyers' problems in defending persons sentenced to the death penalty.
Among the reasons for the need to adopt such a resolution, in particular, the following:
- despite the growing number of abolitionist states, some countries do not provide official information about their use of the death penalty, considering such information a state secret. Disclosure of a state secret is recognized in such countries as an act of treason;
- in some countries, death sentences are carried out secretly, without prior notification of the parents of the condemned, their lawyers, and sometimes even the condemned themselves;
- showing transparency in the issuing and execution of the death sentence has direct implications for the maintenance of human rights, both for those facing the death penalty and for others;
- without transparency, it is impossible to ensure the humane treatment of persons who are in custody and awaiting the execution of the death sentence and to provide them with proper procedural and legal protection under the applicable international law;
- showing transparency in the imposition and execution of the death sentence limits the ability of lawyers to fully perform their professional duties in the best interests of their clients facing the death penalty.
The signatories of the Resolution are convinced that the bar and professional organizations of lawyers have a key role in defending the idea of the need to abolish the death penalty and introduce a moratorium on this measure of punishment, as well as a role in protecting the rights to a fair trial.
The purpose of this Resolution is to call on bar associations and professional organizations of lawyers of all countries (both abolitionists and supporters of the preservation of the death penalty) to:
- upholding respect for transparency in states that retain the death penalty, data relating to the imposition and application of the death penalty, in particular on persons sentenced to death and executed, the crimes for which they were convicted, the method of execution, and the attack. , when amnesty or pardon was applied to them;
- advocacy for the right to a fair trial and due process of law for all persons facing the death penalty, without discrimination, including a human rights defender's regular access to his client and all evidence against him;
- participation in the international defense of the ideas of transparency in the issuance and execution of death sentences and their abolition throughout the world.
Popular news
Practice of law
BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases
In legal practice, it is not uncommon for court hearings in different cases to be scheduled at the same time. This raises the question: which case should the advocate attend first, and can the court interfere with this decision?
Edition
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions
The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.
Announcements
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun
The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».
Abroad
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?
Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.
Discussion
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability
On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.
Abroad
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues
The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel
The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.
Self-government
Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly
A unitary state requires uniform standards for access to the profession and disciplinary responsibility, which is why the Ukrainian National Bar Association acts as a professional organization. Accusations of monopoly are false, because public associations cannot replace professional self-government.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences