Only lawyers have the right to control the quality of free legal aid
The model of interaction between the bar and the bodies involved in the provision of free legal aid, as well as the special status of lawyers in the FLA system, as defined by law, should be reflected at the subordinate level.
Oksana Kadenko, the chairman of the UNBA Committee on Legal Aid, drew attention to this when assessing the draft resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers «Some issues of organization of free primary legal aid provision by local self-government bodies».
The document, which was prepared by the Ministry of Justice, was reviewed on October 11 by the Government Committee on Economic, Financial and Legal Policy, Fuel and Energy Complex, Strategic Industries and Law Enforcement.
It is planned to be approved by a Cabinet of Ministers resolution:
- The procedure for engaging lawyers and other specialists in the relevant field of law by local governments to provide free primary legal aid;
- The procedure for providing free primary legal aid by entities established or contracted by local governments.
Among other issues, the qualification requirements for lawyers proposed for their participation in the provision of free primary legal aid (FLA) and the subjects of quality control of assistance were objected to during the meeting.
Thus, according to the draft Procedure, lawyers who meet the following four requirements will be allowed to provide FLA:
1) availability of information about them in the URAU;
2) at least one year of legal practice experience;
3) participation in the professional development activities of the Ukrainian Bar (during the current or previous year);
4) no disciplinary sanctions (within the last year).
At the same time, there are only two requirements for other legal professionals who can also provide FLA: a higher legal education and at least one year of work experience in the relevant field of law (for the last two years).
Representing the position of the developer, Deputy Minister of Justice Oleksandr Banchuk explained that such requirements for lawyers should provide local governments with ample opportunities to find FLA providers. However, he did not comment on the feasibility of introducing increased requirements for lawyers.
However, Ms. Kadenko called this differentiated approach completely unreasonable and discriminatory. «It is presumed that a lawyer is a professional, highly qualified legal service provider by his status. He or she already has the relevant work experience, has passed the qualification selection, is constantly improving his or her skills, etc. - If the state believes that all lawyers who have one year of work experience after obtaining a bachelor's degree can provide free legal aid, what are the grounds for setting additional higher standards for lawyers?».
As for the quality, completeness, and timeliness of free legal aid, the drafters intend that local governments should monitor this. As the Deputy Minister explained, it is the person who pays for the work who should control the quality of the work.
At the same time, according to Part 2 of Article 25 of the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law», the provision of free legal aid by lawyers should be evaluated by commissions established for this purpose by regional bar councils. Local self-government bodies are defined only as subjects of application.
«In other words, the law attributes the assessment of the quality of legal aid provision to the functions of the bar self-government, and specific bodies - quality assessment commissions - are designated as the subjects of the assessment», - explained the head of the UNBA's specialized committee.
She insisted that the quality of professional activity cannot be checked outside the bar by third parties. «In fact, the proposed wording of the draft law negates the independence of the bar from state authorities and local self-government bodies guaranteed by law, as the latter receive control functions over lawyers, - noted Kadenko. - According to the law, the bar has created a system of bodies for assessing the quality of free legal aid provision, and this system is able to fulfill its tasks».
«Today there are neither factual nor legal grounds to violate the law and to grant the same powers to local governments», - summarized the UNBA representative.
The Ukrainian National Bar Association will continue to defend the position of inadmissibility of interference of state authorities and local governments in the exercise of self-governing functions by the bar. Therefore, the draft resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers will soon be considered and evaluated by the Bar Council of Ukraine at a special extraordinary meeting.
Popular news
Interaction
Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation
Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Discussion
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails
The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».
Rule of Law Roadmap
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change
On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform
On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ukraine has signed the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer
Today, on 9 March, Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi signed the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. This makes our country the 28th to sign this important international treaty.
European integration
The subgroup on European integration held its inaugural meeting
On March 5, the Ukrainian National Bar Association hosted a meeting of the subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in terms of reforming the advocacy sector, entitled «European integration, international practice and digitalization».
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates