Threats of creating a database of judge assistants assessed by the BCU - open appeal

The emergence of a database of personal data of judicial assistants, the justification of the purposes of its creation and the announced name of the project may indicate intentions to undermine the authority of the judiciary, attempts to create artificial obstacles to the participation of assistants in the selection procedures for judges, as well as attempts to obtain additional tools of pressure on judges themselves.
This was the assessment of the project of the Ukrainian Association «Automaidan» (originally called «Judicial henchmen») by the Bar Council of Ukraine during an extraordinary meeting on November 9.
Below is the full text of the open appeal approved by the decision of the BCU No. 114:
To the President of Ukraine
Volodymyr ZELENSKY
Chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine
Ruslan Stefanchuk
Other competent authorities
and interested parties
OPEN APPEAL
OF THE BAR COUNCIL OF UKRAINE
On November 7 this year, the Ukrainian Association «Automaidan» announced the creation of the first open database of personal data of judicial assistants from almost all regions of Ukraine. The project, called «Judicial henchmen», was funded by the National Endowment for Democracy.
The importance of creating the database and public access to it was motivated, in particular, by the corruption of the Ukrainian judicial system, because «quite often, judicial assistants in Ukraine, and then judges, become judges not through knowledge and hard work, but through connections and corrupt influence». Therefore, «the information posted on this resource will be useful both to the public and journalists monitoring the judicial reform process in Ukraine, as well as to ordinary citizens who care about cleaning up the judicial system and forming an honest judiciary».
Following a negative reaction from the professional community and judicial governance bodies in Ukraine, the project's title, which was derogatory and degrading to patronage service employees, was removed.
The Bar Council of Ukraine believes that the fact of the emergence of this database, the justification of the purposes of its creation and the announced name of the project are manifestations of the biased attitude of the Ukrainian Association «Automaidan» to judges and their assistants, and may also indicate intentions to undermine the authority of the judiciary, create artificial obstacles to the participation of assistants in the selection procedures for judges, as well as attempts to obtain additional tools of pressure on judges themselves.
The position of a judge's assistant requires a professional and responsible attitude to the functions of ensuring the administration of justice.
Defining the role of judge assistants, the Advisory Council of European Judges in its Opinion of 07.11.2019 No. 22 (2019) noted that judge assistants, especially those involved in the judgment-making process, perform important duties within the judicial system. Their behavior can directly affect the trust of the public and parties seeking justice. They belong to a category of professionals who must meet high professional and ethical standards and thereby contribute to strengthening public confidence in the judiciary.
However, due to the lack of adequate financial support for the patronage service, the judiciary has long been facing a staffing crisis, which directly affects the quality of the administration of justice.
Supporting the open appeal of the Council of Judges of Ukraine to place an open database of judicial assistants on the Internet (decision of the CCU of 07.11.2023 No. 50), the Bar Council of Ukraine:
- condemns any manifestations of disrespectful attitude towards the judicial system of Ukraine and its employees;
- considers unacceptable the implementation of projects that undermine confidence in the judiciary;
- Emphasizes that such interference with the judiciary poses a direct threat to the national security of Ukraine;
- calls in this regard on the state authorities and law enforcement agencies to assess the project within their competence and take measures to eliminate real and potential threats associated with the public disclosure of the database of personal data of judicial assistants;
- expresses distrust of the Ukrainian Association «Automaidan» in terms of its further participation in the reform of the judicial system;
- draws the attention of the National Endowment for Democracy to the fact that the funds allocated by it were used for illegal purposes to the detriment of Ukraine's interests.
Sincerely yours
President of the Bar Council of Ukraine,
of the Ukrainian National Bar Association Lidiya Izovitova
Popular news

Advocacy
Another conflict with the TCC: an advocate's leg was broken and his client jumped out of a window
On June 19, at the premises of the military medical commission, where a bus from the Krasnograd Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support delivered several people, an incident occurred involving the use of physical force against an advocate.

Advocacy
Independence of advocacy and accountability of expertise: different models, shared responsibility
Two different models of professional organization coexist in Ukraine: advocacy with established self-government and judicial and expert activities that remain under state control. How can approaches be balanced, the openness of expert opinions ensured, and effective interaction between specialists established?

Advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of t…
On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

Advocacy
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession
The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

Advocacy
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure
The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

Advocacy
BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine will appeal to the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, Vasyl Malyuk, regarding the verification of information about «negative trends in the legal profession» disseminated by some media outlets on behalf of the SSU.

Advocacy
Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature
Thirteen member states of the Council of Europe have signed the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate, which was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on March 12, 2025. Four more countries will do so today. Ukraine is not among them.

Advocacy
BCU initiates resolution of the issue of visits by advocates to convicted persons
Article 110 of the Criminal Enforcement Code guarantees convicted persons confidentiality of meetings with their advocate. One of the important elements is the possibility to communicate with an advocate in a room without a solid partition. In practice, this provision of the law is systematically violated.
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…