The role of advocacy in crisis: lessons from the war: V. Gvozdiy speaks
No international standards, including those developed by the United Nations, contain any guidelines or recommendations for professional associations of lawyers in the event of war. Therefore, the role and responsibilities of the bar in those jurisdictions that are experiencing a crisis are difficult to define.
This was emphasized by Valentyn Gvozdiy, the Vice President of UNBA in his speech at the Conference on the Day of the Finnish Bar, which took place on January 26 in Helsinki. At the event, organized by the Finnish Bar Association, he was invited to make a presentation on the role of lawyers and associations in protecting the rule of law during the crisis.
In particular, V. Gvozdiy recalled the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, adopted by the 8th UN Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders in 1990. This document declares that professional associations of lawyers play a vital role in maintaining professional standards and ethics, protecting their members from harassment and undue restrictions and encroachments, providing legal services to all who need them, and cooperating with government and other institutions in achieving the ends of justice and protecting the public interest.
«But the general content of the document clearly indicates that no exceptions are made for associations, even in times of war. This means that the duties of the bar remain unchanged even in times of crisis», the Vice President of UNBA expressed his conviction. He also emphasized that currently there are no principles, guidelines or advice that would help professional associations to navigate their response to violence, politics, threats to life and massive human rights violations.
V. Gvozdiy shared with the participants of the international conference the lessons learned by the Ukrainian National Bar Association during the war. One of these lessons, in his opinion, is the need to uphold the rule of law, the content of which is devalued in crisis conditions by both individual state institutions and society.
Lawyers in Ukraine handle a variety of cases, many of which are war-related. It is always a challenge for a defense lawyer to be the first in a situation that no one has faced before. Many lawyers work on cases aimed at restoring justice for people who have been illegally detained and tortured. «We insist that the right to a fair trial should remain inviolable even under martial law», summarized », the Vice President of UNBA.
Another negative phenomenon that has been spreading over the past two years is the identification of lawyers with clients. Even representatives of law enforcement agencies allow themselves to treat defense counsel as an accomplice to the crime of which the client is accused. As a result, lawyers are even subjected to physical violence.
According to V. Gvozdiy, the reason for the aggravation of these problems during the war was, in particular, the radicalization of sentiments in society and the devaluation of legal standards in the minds of citizens. «Tens of thousands of human casualties among both military and civilians, destruction of infrastructure and residential buildings, economic losses and lower living standards, severance of social ties - against this background, the attitude of Ukrainians to war crimes and crimes against humanity committed by the aggressor country is unequivocal: the perpetrators must be punished at all costs, the lawyer explained. - Therefore, the defenders face at least misunderstanding in society, and in some cases – indignation».
«But the position of the Ukrainian National Bar Association, even under such circumstances, remains unwavering: the rule of law must be respected. The right to a fair trial must be ensured in Ukraine, no matter how heinous the crimes are. And against the backdrop of the aggressor's actions, this opinion is unpopular and difficult to understand», summarized V. Gvozdiy.
Earlier, the European Criminal Bar Association (ECBA) expressed its support for the UNBA in this position, recalling that the highest purpose of the bar is to ensure that all people, regardless of the severity of the charges against them, receive a fair trial, free from intimidation and bias. The ECBA also called on the Ukrainian authorities to ensure the protection of lawyers, and on the Prosecutor General's Office and law enforcement agencies to take measures to stop any acts of interference with the professional activities of lawyers, to condemn attempts to exert pressure, and to impartially and effectively investigate all attacks on lawyers.
Popular news
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ukraine has signed the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer
Today, on 9 March, Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi signed the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. This makes our country the 28th to sign this important international treaty.
European integration
A translation of the report on advocacy presented to the European Parliament has been published
A translation of a research report on the Ukrainian advocacy profession in wartime, previously presented to the European Parliament in Brussels, has been published. The document is presented as a basis for discussion on the rule of law, Ukraine's European integration aspirations, and countering Russian disinformation in the legal sphere.
Legal defence of military personnel
How to formalize discharge from military service: practical workshop
The issue of discharge from military service remains one of the most pressing and complex for Ukrainian defenders and their families. Due to constant changes in legislation, military personnel often face refusals to discharge them from service or even to consider their reports.
Legislation
The Verkhovna Rada Committee criticized the format of the government working group on advocacy
The implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law (approved by Cabinet of Ministers Resolution No. 475-r of May 14, 2025) in relation to advocacy raises the practical question of who exactly should prepare legislative changes and how.
Self-government
The BCU demands a review of the composition of the government working group on reforming the advocacy profession
The President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova, appealed to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine to review the composition of the working group on improving legislation in the field of advocacy and legal practice.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The President has determined, who will sign the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer
President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy authorized Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi to sign the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.
Legislation
After the war amnesty for criminals or exemption from responsibility?
To ensure national reconciliation, rehabilitation of persons who have been persecuted for political reasons, restoration of justice, and establishment of lasting peace, it is proposed to introduce an amnesty after the war.
Discussion
Why lowering the age of marriage lacks legal logic
Although until 2012 there was a provision in family law that allowed children to marry from the age of 14 under certain circumstances, its return to Ukrainian law would contradict international obligations and the logic of criminal law.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates