Problems of the Ukrainian Bar were discussed at a conference in Vienna
The 52nd European Conference of Presidents of Legal Organizations, traditionally organized by the Austrian Bar Association (ÖRAK), has recently taken place at Vienna's Ferstel Palace.
More than two hundred representatives of European and international organizations of lawyers, judges, politicians and academics from forty countries gathered in the legal center of Europe to discuss topical issues of the rule of law and problems of realization of fundamental human rights and freedoms.
The Ukrainian delegation was represented by Lidiya Izovitova, president of the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the Bar Council of Ukraine, Valentyn Gvozdiy, vice president of UNBA, BCU and Serhiy Barbashyn, chairman of the UNBA Next Gen.
In her report, president of the UNBA focused on the problems of the Ukrainian bar under martial law. The professional organization, which unites all Ukrainian lawyers, has recently received reports of shameful pressure exerted on defense lawyers. Thus, if the prosecution does not like the overly active position of a lawyer in a criminal case, and there are no procedural (legal) tools to defend the legal position, representatives of the military authorities (TCC) suddenly appear in the courtroom and hand the lawyer a mobilization notice.
Judges, prosecutors, their assistants, law enforcement officers, and all other employees of the justice system are protected from mobilization. However, lawyers have no guarantees in this regard. Even though the Constitution of Ukraine entrusts them with the function of providing legal aid, and the institution is recognized as a component of justice.
L.Izovitova emphasized the risks in protecting the rights of citizens and the absence of a provision on booking lawyers in the government draft law No. 10449 on strengthening mobilization, introduced on January 30 this year. The draft law was adopted by the Verkhovna Rada in the first reading extremely quickly without taking into account the position of the bar, which was sent by the UNBA to the Parliament. The very next day, the Bar Council of Ukraine convened an extraordinary meeting and decided to submit the relevant amendments to the legislative initiative.
President of the UNBA emphasized that in this case it is not only about observance of the principle of fair justice, equality of participants in legal proceedings and guarantees of legal profession, but first of all about ensuring the right to legal aid for vulnerable groups of the population and other citizens of Ukraine, including military personnel. L. Izovitova expressed her hope for support in this matter.
Other speakers at the conference included First Deputy President of the European Parliament Othmar Karas, President of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) Pierre-Dominique Schupp, Rector of Johannes Kepler University of Linz Lucas Meinhardt, Director of the Center for Artificial Intelligence and Digital Policy (USA), Professor Mark Rothenberg, and other distinguished guests.
V.Gvozdiy held a number of working meetings with the heads of European bars to further establish cooperation and provide assistance to Ukrainian lawyers who suffered losses as a result of military operations in our country.
After the conference, the Austrian Federal Minister for EU and Constitutional Affairs Caroline Edtstadler invited the conference participants to the Federal Chancellery. Federal Minister of Justice Alma Zadic hosted a reception at the Trautson Palace.
Popular news
Practice of law
BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases
In legal practice, it is not uncommon for court hearings in different cases to be scheduled at the same time. This raises the question: which case should the advocate attend first, and can the court interfere with this decision?
Edition
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions
The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.
Announcements
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun
The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».
Abroad
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?
Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.
Discussion
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability
On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.
Abroad
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues
The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel
The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.
Self-government
Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly
A unitary state requires uniform standards for access to the profession and disciplinary responsibility, which is why the Ukrainian National Bar Association acts as a professional organization. Accusations of monopoly are false, because public associations cannot replace professional self-government.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences