Problems of the Ukrainian Bar were discussed at a conference in Vienna
The 52nd European Conference of Presidents of Legal Organizations, traditionally organized by the Austrian Bar Association (ÖRAK), has recently taken place at Vienna's Ferstel Palace.
More than two hundred representatives of European and international organizations of lawyers, judges, politicians and academics from forty countries gathered in the legal center of Europe to discuss topical issues of the rule of law and problems of realization of fundamental human rights and freedoms.
The Ukrainian delegation was represented by Lidiya Izovitova, president of the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the Bar Council of Ukraine, Valentyn Gvozdiy, vice president of UNBA, BCU and Serhiy Barbashyn, chairman of the UNBA Next Gen.
In her report, president of the UNBA focused on the problems of the Ukrainian bar under martial law. The professional organization, which unites all Ukrainian lawyers, has recently received reports of shameful pressure exerted on defense lawyers. Thus, if the prosecution does not like the overly active position of a lawyer in a criminal case, and there are no procedural (legal) tools to defend the legal position, representatives of the military authorities (TCC) suddenly appear in the courtroom and hand the lawyer a mobilization notice.
Judges, prosecutors, their assistants, law enforcement officers, and all other employees of the justice system are protected from mobilization. However, lawyers have no guarantees in this regard. Even though the Constitution of Ukraine entrusts them with the function of providing legal aid, and the institution is recognized as a component of justice.
L.Izovitova emphasized the risks in protecting the rights of citizens and the absence of a provision on booking lawyers in the government draft law No. 10449 on strengthening mobilization, introduced on January 30 this year. The draft law was adopted by the Verkhovna Rada in the first reading extremely quickly without taking into account the position of the bar, which was sent by the UNBA to the Parliament. The very next day, the Bar Council of Ukraine convened an extraordinary meeting and decided to submit the relevant amendments to the legislative initiative.
President of the UNBA emphasized that in this case it is not only about observance of the principle of fair justice, equality of participants in legal proceedings and guarantees of legal profession, but first of all about ensuring the right to legal aid for vulnerable groups of the population and other citizens of Ukraine, including military personnel. L. Izovitova expressed her hope for support in this matter.
Other speakers at the conference included First Deputy President of the European Parliament Othmar Karas, President of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) Pierre-Dominique Schupp, Rector of Johannes Kepler University of Linz Lucas Meinhardt, Director of the Center for Artificial Intelligence and Digital Policy (USA), Professor Mark Rothenberg, and other distinguished guests.
V.Gvozdiy held a number of working meetings with the heads of European bars to further establish cooperation and provide assistance to Ukrainian lawyers who suffered losses as a result of military operations in our country.
After the conference, the Austrian Federal Minister for EU and Constitutional Affairs Caroline Edtstadler invited the conference participants to the Federal Chancellery. Federal Minister of Justice Alma Zadic hosted a reception at the Trautson Palace.
Popular news
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform
On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ukraine has signed the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer
Today, on 9 March, Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi signed the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. This makes our country the 28th to sign this important international treaty.
European integration
«Freedom or security» — a false formula: speech by L. Izovitova at the conference of bar presidents
Is the state protecting society from crime today, or is it gradually destroying the rule of law under the guise of this fight? These alarming trends were outlined by the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova, during her speech at the 54th European Conference of bar presidents.
Discussion
AI in advocacy and justice: ethics, regulation, limits of application
The Ukrainian National Bar Association held a roundtable discussion entitled «Artificial Intelligence in the цork of advocates: ethics, responsibility, legal process engineering». Participants discussed how artificial intelligence systems are already being used in the professional activities of advocates and where the ethical boundaries of what is permissible lie.
European integration
Researchers from the USA explain how shadow reports became a grant service
Shadow reporting often becomes a tool for the grant economy and competition for influence on policy. Such «expertise» replaces impartial analysis with the delegitimization of bar self-government, masks conflicts of interest, and is used as a channel for external pressure on the institution.
European integration
A translation of the report on advocacy presented to the European Parliament has been published
A translation of a research report on the Ukrainian advocacy profession in wartime, previously presented to the European Parliament in Brussels, has been published. The document is presented as a basis for discussion on the rule of law, Ukraine's European integration aspirations, and countering Russian disinformation in the legal sphere.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
