Chief Justice orders to eliminate incompatibility of lawyer's status with military service – media
The lawyers who went on military service in the Armed Forces of Ukraine but did not stop practicing law will have to make amends in the near future. Either such «military lawyers» submit a corresponding application to the Bar Council, or their commanders initiate the issue of bringing them to disciplinary responsibility.
The Glavkom publication reports on the relevant separate order of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine dated 10.05.2024.
According to journalists, based on this order, commanders in military units began issuing orders to explain the provisions of Article 7 of the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law» to military personnel who have the status of a lawyer.
This article contains requirements for incompatibility. In particular, military or alternative (non-military) service is considered incompatible with the advocate's activity. And in the event of incompatibility, the advocate is obliged to submit an application for suspension of the practice of law to the regional bar council at the address of his or her workplace within three days from the date of occurrence of such circumstances.
Also, the commanders of the units will warn the servicemen who fail to comply with this requirement that the military unit will initiate the issue of disciplinary action and other disciplinary measures before the relevant regional bar councils. It is proposed to report on the measures taken to implement the order in writing, providing copies of applications for suspension of the practice of law with evidence of their submission.
«The combination of professions leads to improper performance by a citizen of the duties of both a military officer to protect the sovereignty and independence of the state and a lawyer to defend, represent and provide other types of legal assistance to a client, - said Hanna Kolesnyk, the Chairman of the UNBA Committee on Human Rights Protection. - She draws attention to the fact that the specifics of the goals and objectives of the bar require maximum independence of the advocate in the exercise of his or her professional rights and duties. At the same time, according to the Statute of the Internal Service of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, one of the main principles is the sole authority and strict subordination».
At the beginning of the full-scale aggression, the Bar Council of Ukraine decided not to consider it a violation of the requirements for incompatibility of military or alternative (non-military) service by lawyers during martial law and not to apply such a ground for bringing a lawyer to disciplinary responsibility (Decision No. 24 of 03.03.2022).
«It is unlikely that anyone will question the idea that those lawyers who are really fighting at the front have no time to provide legal assistance to clients, - explains H. Kolesnyk. - But some lawyers took Decision No. 24 as a permission to combine military service with the practice of law. And those of them who are «sitting on their hands» in the rear somehow secretly found time to earn extra money. Moreover, they even allow themselves to come to court in military uniforms, considering such behavior quite normal. The Unified State Register of Court Decisions contains many decisions made with the participation of such military lawyers. And such lawyers openly violate the direct provision of the law, sometimes hiding their essentially illegal activities with patriotic slogans».
Due to the ambiguity of the perception of the content of this decision, it was later clarified (decision of 02.08.2022 No. 60) that the exemption from liability does not exempt lawyers from fulfilling the requirements for suspension of the practice of law due to incompatibility.
That is, if, due to urgent mobilization, the advocate did not have time to suspend his or her right to practice law (to submit a corresponding application) for obvious reasons, he or she should not be disciplined for this, but when the advocate-military man has the opportunity, he or she should submit an application for suspension of the practice of law.
It is also worth noting that the suspension of the right to practice law does not deprive a person of the status of an advocate. Such a person may freely return to the profession after the relevant circumstances disappear (for example, discharge from military service). To do so, they do not need to pass any competitions or take exams again. It is enough to inform the Bar Council of your decision.
As a general rule, the practice of law in conditions of incompatibility is not allowed. And according to clause 1 of part 2 of Article 34 of the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law», violation of the requirements of incompatibility is a disciplinary offense of an advocate, and is, accordingly, the basis for bringing an advocate to justice.
Thus, performing military service and practicing law (drafting procedural documents, participating in court hearings, including via video conferencing) constitutes a disciplinary offense.
Read more about this in the article «Why there are no military lawyers».
Popular news
Legislation
A bill implementing the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer has been introduced
The constitutional guarantees of legal aid, defense, and the independence of advocacy cannot be realized without protecting advocates from unwarranted interference in their professional activities, including searches, the seizure of professional materials and the use of criminal procedural mechanisms to exert pressure.
Rule of Law Roadmap
The UNBA presented the key provisions of the future law on advocacy in Brussels
The Ukrainian National Bar Association presented its proposals for the upcoming law on advocacy, aligned with the Rule of Law Roadmap. The presentation covered topics such as access to the profession, self-governance, disciplinary procedures, professional development and guarantees for the practice of advocacy.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Independent oversight is necessary before using CISA materials against an advocate – Lidiya Izovitova
Before the prosecution uses information obtained during covert investigative actions and related to an advocate’s activities, independent procedural oversight must be conducted. It is necessary to determine whether such information is covered by attorney-client privilege and whether it may be disclosed.
Self-government
Efforts to develop advocacy must be brought to fruition — A. Misyats
The Ukrainian advocacy profession is currently going through a critical phase. Amid the war, it must ensure the continuity of legal aid, defend the independence of the profession, and improve qualification and disciplinary procedures in accordance with European standards. The work that has been started must be brought to a practical conclusion.
Support
Protecting the legal profession, cybersecurity and support for advocates: common themes for the IBA and the UNBA
On September 18, a working meeting was held at the office of the Ukrainian National Bar Association with Executive Director of the International Bar Association (IBA) Mark Ellis. The parties discussed the Ukrainian advocacy profession’s participation in European legal processes, the protection of the UNBA’s digital infrastructure, psychological support for advocates and future areas of cooperation.
Educational events
Tax residency of Ukrainians abroad: what matters
The determination of tax residency for Ukrainians who have been living abroad for an extended period depends on the combination of their personal and economic ties to each country. The established status determines the procedure for reporting income, paying taxes and fulfilling CFC reporting obligations.
Educational events
Time, risk of dismissal and effort to provide rationale: how a court reads a procedural document
When drafting a procedural document, an advocate should take into account three criteria used by the court: the time required to review the materials, the risk of the decision being overturned, and the effort required to provide a rationale for it.
Discussion
When working with sole proprietorships leads to business fragmentation: criteria and recommendations
What criteria do regulatory and law enforcement agencies use to identify artificial business fragmentation? How does this model differ from franchising? And when can tax optimization lead to criminal liability?
Publications
Vasyl Kolishnyi, «Law and Business» Supporting mental health should become part of the professional culture of the Bar, - H. Udovenko
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection