Chief Justice orders to eliminate incompatibility of lawyer's status with military service – media
The lawyers who went on military service in the Armed Forces of Ukraine but did not stop practicing law will have to make amends in the near future. Either such «military lawyers» submit a corresponding application to the Bar Council, or their commanders initiate the issue of bringing them to disciplinary responsibility.
The Glavkom publication reports on the relevant separate order of the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of Ukraine dated 10.05.2024.
According to journalists, based on this order, commanders in military units began issuing orders to explain the provisions of Article 7 of the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law» to military personnel who have the status of a lawyer.
This article contains requirements for incompatibility. In particular, military or alternative (non-military) service is considered incompatible with the advocate's activity. And in the event of incompatibility, the advocate is obliged to submit an application for suspension of the practice of law to the regional bar council at the address of his or her workplace within three days from the date of occurrence of such circumstances.
Also, the commanders of the units will warn the servicemen who fail to comply with this requirement that the military unit will initiate the issue of disciplinary action and other disciplinary measures before the relevant regional bar councils. It is proposed to report on the measures taken to implement the order in writing, providing copies of applications for suspension of the practice of law with evidence of their submission.
«The combination of professions leads to improper performance by a citizen of the duties of both a military officer to protect the sovereignty and independence of the state and a lawyer to defend, represent and provide other types of legal assistance to a client, - said Hanna Kolesnyk, the Chairman of the UNBA Committee on Human Rights Protection. - She draws attention to the fact that the specifics of the goals and objectives of the bar require maximum independence of the advocate in the exercise of his or her professional rights and duties. At the same time, according to the Statute of the Internal Service of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, one of the main principles is the sole authority and strict subordination».
At the beginning of the full-scale aggression, the Bar Council of Ukraine decided not to consider it a violation of the requirements for incompatibility of military or alternative (non-military) service by lawyers during martial law and not to apply such a ground for bringing a lawyer to disciplinary responsibility (Decision No. 24 of 03.03.2022).
«It is unlikely that anyone will question the idea that those lawyers who are really fighting at the front have no time to provide legal assistance to clients, - explains H. Kolesnyk. - But some lawyers took Decision No. 24 as a permission to combine military service with the practice of law. And those of them who are «sitting on their hands» in the rear somehow secretly found time to earn extra money. Moreover, they even allow themselves to come to court in military uniforms, considering such behavior quite normal. The Unified State Register of Court Decisions contains many decisions made with the participation of such military lawyers. And such lawyers openly violate the direct provision of the law, sometimes hiding their essentially illegal activities with patriotic slogans».
Due to the ambiguity of the perception of the content of this decision, it was later clarified (decision of 02.08.2022 No. 60) that the exemption from liability does not exempt lawyers from fulfilling the requirements for suspension of the practice of law due to incompatibility.
That is, if, due to urgent mobilization, the advocate did not have time to suspend his or her right to practice law (to submit a corresponding application) for obvious reasons, he or she should not be disciplined for this, but when the advocate-military man has the opportunity, he or she should submit an application for suspension of the practice of law.
It is also worth noting that the suspension of the right to practice law does not deprive a person of the status of an advocate. Such a person may freely return to the profession after the relevant circumstances disappear (for example, discharge from military service). To do so, they do not need to pass any competitions or take exams again. It is enough to inform the Bar Council of your decision.
As a general rule, the practice of law in conditions of incompatibility is not allowed. And according to clause 1 of part 2 of Article 34 of the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law», violation of the requirements of incompatibility is a disciplinary offense of an advocate, and is, accordingly, the basis for bringing an advocate to justice.
Thus, performing military service and practicing law (drafting procedural documents, participating in court hearings, including via video conferencing) constitutes a disciplinary offense.
Read more about this in the article «Why there are no military lawyers».
Popular news
Discussion
The Ministry of Defense is preparing new procedures for MMC: what changes are being proposed
The Ministry of Defense is establishing an interagency working group to develop a new procedure for military medical examinations conducted by military medical commissions. Among the issues requiring resolution are the issuance of documents based on examination results, referrals for repeat medical examinations, verification of the medical basis for decisions, and the accountability of military medical commission members.
Interaction
The UNBA is developing a concept for a Center for expert research
The Ukrainian National Bar Association has begun work on a concept for a Center for expert research, which is intended to provide advocates and their clients with access to specialized knowledge and the ability to have expert opinions professionally reviewed.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ombudsman calls for a firm response to violence against advocates
Every instance of obstruction of an advocate’s lawful activities, use of physical force, delaying an investigation, or concealment of evidence must be subject to a proper legal assessment. The state is obligated to ensure that the right to a defense is a genuine guarantee.
Greetings
The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice
Denis Maslov’s many years of experience as a advocate, his work as a judge and his tenure as chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine’s Committee on legal policy have given him a deep understanding of how the legal system functions and the challenges it faces.
Legislation
The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy
The section on advocacy and legal aid in the draft anti-corruption strategy for 2026–2030 goes beyond the scope of anti-corruption policy and is inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession.
Announcements
Advocates are invited to the III UAA Arbitration Academy 2026
The UNBA, at the initiative of the Committee on alternative dispute resolution, invites advocates, lawyers, students, judges, government officials and anyone interested in international arbitration to participate in the III UAA Arbitration Academy 2026.
Educational events
How can an advocate recharge if fatigue persists after the weekend?
Fatigue resulting from prolonged stress does not always go away after sleep, a weekend, or a vacation. In situations of chronic stress, it is important for advocates not only to «take a break» but also to understand exactly which resource has been depleted and what type of rest is needed.
Discussion
Complaints, time limits and prosecutorial powers: what gaps in the CPC do advocates see?
During the pretrial investigation stage, the effectiveness of the defense depends to a large extent on the proper implementation of procedural safeguards: the timely consideration of complaints, the advocate’s access to information regarding the progress of the proceedings and so on.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates