Localization of public procurement: does the law work (research results)
Improving the mechanism of maintaining the register of localized goods producers will not only reduce the level of fraudulent schemes in the register, but also increase investors' interest in the development of Ukrainian business.
This was stated by Andriy Shabelnikov, Chairman of the UNBA Committee on Investment Activity and Privatization, commenting on the results of the hearings in the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Economic Policy on «Post-legislative control in the field of compliance with the requirements for the local component (localization) in public procurement».
During the event, MPs, representatives of the Ministry of Economy, the State Audit Service, the Antimonopoly Committee, specialized associations and manufacturers analyzed the effectiveness of the implementation of the Law of 16.12.2021 No. 1977-IX «On Amendments to the Law of Ukraine «On Public Procurement» on Creating Preconditions for Sustainable Development and Modernization of the Domestic Industry».
Earlier, the parliamentary committee interviewed business entities involved in the procurement of localized goods, as well as regulatory authorities. The respondents shared their thoughts on whether the law has worked in practice, what are the achievements and problems in its implementation, and how to resolve the difficulties that have arisen.
As a reminder, the law introduced the degree of localization of production - an indicator of the local component in the share of the cost of raw materials, components, assemblies, parts, components and components of products, works, services and other components of domestic production in the cost of the goods that are the subject of procurement.
By 2032, the law established specifics for the procurement of goods that require the customer to comply with the degree of localization of production, which must be equal to or greater than 10% in 2022 and 40% after 2028. The degree of localization of production must be determined by the manufacturer of the goods in accordance with the formula established by law.
During the event, the participants were presented with the generalized results of the survey by the main groups: suppliers of goods, customers of goods, state control and supervision authorities.
In particular, 61.9% of suppliers of goods noted that the introduction of localization had not affected their business at all. This is due to several factors: products not falling under the law, a low localization threshold at the initial stages, and the lack of necessary regulations and explanations from government agencies.
To increase the level of localization, some companies plan to develop their own production of components and equipment (33.3%), while others intend to cooperate with Ukrainian manufacturers (23.8%). However, there are also those who do not intend to take any measures (14.3%). At the same time, more than half of the respondents expressed confidence that by 2028 the level of localization of their products will be at least 40%, while almost a quarter still doubts that they will be able to reach this figure. The full results of the survey can be found here.
The participants of the committee hearings were also presented with the results of monitoring procurement with localization through the Prozoro system, told about the improvement of the mechanism for maintaining the register of localized goods producers, the fight against fraud in the register, measures to monitor compliance with the law, and discussed proposals for possible changes to the legislation on localization.
Popular news
Legislation
Advocates have warned that the draft Labor Code would curtail workers' protections
Certain provisions of the draft Labor Code of Ukraine regarding collective labor disputes undermine labor protections and do not comply with constitutional and international standards.
Educational events
The right of minors to marry: how judicial oversight works
The issue of granting minors the right to marry lies at the intersection of family law, child protection, and judicial discretion. The UNBA Committee on family law dedicated a webinar held on March 30 to this very topic.
Interaction
The UNBA and the Coordination headquarters have agreed to cooperate in assisting those released from captivity
Servicemen released from captivity, family members of prisoners of war, civilians deprived of their personal liberty as a result of armed aggression, as well as persons missing in connection with the war, will gain additional opportunities to access legal assistance and protect their rights.
Self-government
BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession
The Bar Council of Ukraine has concluded that, in its recent decisions, the High Council of Justice has, without legal grounds, called into question the right of bar self-governing bodies to protect the guarantees of legal practice and has, in effect, attempted to grant one of its members — who retains the status of an advocate — special immunity from the Rules of professional conduct and disciplinary responsibility.
Announcements
The Bar Council of Ukraine begins its meeting
Today, April 2, a meeting of the Bar Council of Ukraine is taking place in Kyiv. On the agenda are issues related to the activities of bar self-governing bodies, consideration of a decision by the High Council of Justice, a number of appeals, as well as a discussion of the current state and pressing issues regarding the functioning of the legal aid system.
Interaction
The UNBA and the National Guard have agreed to cooperate on legal protection for military personnel
Servicemembers of the National Guard, their family members, and veterans are to receive additional legal tools to protect their rights, while the National Guard’s legal services will receive methodological and expert support.
Discussion
Advocates barred from visiting clients in Temporary detention facility: discussion at the UNBA
The right to legal representation in the first hours following arrest is often rendered meaningless when advocates are denied access to their clients in temporary detention facilities due to bureaucratic barriers, requests for documents not required by the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the practice of detaining people there under the pretext of «security measures».
Interaction
Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation
Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates