Localization of public procurement: does the law work (research results)

Improving the mechanism of maintaining the register of localized goods producers will not only reduce the level of fraudulent schemes in the register, but also increase investors' interest in the development of Ukrainian business.
This was stated by Andriy Shabelnikov, Chairman of the UNBA Committee on Investment Activity and Privatization, commenting on the results of the hearings in the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Economic Policy on «Post-legislative control in the field of compliance with the requirements for the local component (localization) in public procurement».
During the event, MPs, representatives of the Ministry of Economy, the State Audit Service, the Antimonopoly Committee, specialized associations and manufacturers analyzed the effectiveness of the implementation of the Law of 16.12.2021 No. 1977-IX «On Amendments to the Law of Ukraine «On Public Procurement» on Creating Preconditions for Sustainable Development and Modernization of the Domestic Industry».
Earlier, the parliamentary committee interviewed business entities involved in the procurement of localized goods, as well as regulatory authorities. The respondents shared their thoughts on whether the law has worked in practice, what are the achievements and problems in its implementation, and how to resolve the difficulties that have arisen.
As a reminder, the law introduced the degree of localization of production - an indicator of the local component in the share of the cost of raw materials, components, assemblies, parts, components and components of products, works, services and other components of domestic production in the cost of the goods that are the subject of procurement.
By 2032, the law established specifics for the procurement of goods that require the customer to comply with the degree of localization of production, which must be equal to or greater than 10% in 2022 and 40% after 2028. The degree of localization of production must be determined by the manufacturer of the goods in accordance with the formula established by law.
During the event, the participants were presented with the generalized results of the survey by the main groups: suppliers of goods, customers of goods, state control and supervision authorities.
In particular, 61.9% of suppliers of goods noted that the introduction of localization had not affected their business at all. This is due to several factors: products not falling under the law, a low localization threshold at the initial stages, and the lack of necessary regulations and explanations from government agencies.
To increase the level of localization, some companies plan to develop their own production of components and equipment (33.3%), while others intend to cooperate with Ukrainian manufacturers (23.8%). However, there are also those who do not intend to take any measures (14.3%). At the same time, more than half of the respondents expressed confidence that by 2028 the level of localization of their products will be at least 40%, while almost a quarter still doubts that they will be able to reach this figure. The full results of the survey can be found here.
The participants of the committee hearings were also presented with the results of monitoring procurement with localization through the Prozoro system, told about the improvement of the mechanism for maintaining the register of localized goods producers, the fight against fraud in the register, measures to monitor compliance with the law, and discussed proposals for possible changes to the legislation on localization.
Popular news

Self-government
The HCJ continues to ignore the legal deadlines for forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ
The High Council of Justice continues to violate the statutory deadlines for forming a new competition commission to select members of the Competition Commission of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

Advocacy
Another conflict with the TCC: an advocate's leg was broken and his client jumped out of a window
On June 19, at the premises of the military medical commission, where a bus from the Krasnograd Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support delivered several people, an incident occurred involving the use of physical force against an advocate.

Advocacy
Independence of advocacy and accountability of expertise: different models, shared responsibility
Two different models of professional organization coexist in Ukraine: advocacy with established self-government and judicial and expert activities that remain under state control. How can approaches be balanced, the openness of expert opinions ensured, and effective interaction between specialists established?

Advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of t…
On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

Advocacy
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession
The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

Advocacy
Andriy Osipov appointed head of the Ukrainian State Film Agency
The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has appointed Andriy Osipov as head of the Ukrainian State Film Agency.

Advocacy
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure
The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

Advocacy
The specifics of translating documents for the UK and Ukraine were explored in a webinar
In legal practice, document translation is increasingly becoming a subject of attention not only for translators, but also for advocates, courts, and government agencies. What should a translation be like to be legally valid in Ukraine and the UK, what mistakes can ruin a case, and who is responsible for accuracy?
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…