Localization of public procurement: does the law work (research results)
Improving the mechanism of maintaining the register of localized goods producers will not only reduce the level of fraudulent schemes in the register, but also increase investors' interest in the development of Ukrainian business.
This was stated by Andriy Shabelnikov, Chairman of the UNBA Committee on Investment Activity and Privatization, commenting on the results of the hearings in the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Economic Policy on «Post-legislative control in the field of compliance with the requirements for the local component (localization) in public procurement».
During the event, MPs, representatives of the Ministry of Economy, the State Audit Service, the Antimonopoly Committee, specialized associations and manufacturers analyzed the effectiveness of the implementation of the Law of 16.12.2021 No. 1977-IX «On Amendments to the Law of Ukraine «On Public Procurement» on Creating Preconditions for Sustainable Development and Modernization of the Domestic Industry».
Earlier, the parliamentary committee interviewed business entities involved in the procurement of localized goods, as well as regulatory authorities. The respondents shared their thoughts on whether the law has worked in practice, what are the achievements and problems in its implementation, and how to resolve the difficulties that have arisen.
As a reminder, the law introduced the degree of localization of production - an indicator of the local component in the share of the cost of raw materials, components, assemblies, parts, components and components of products, works, services and other components of domestic production in the cost of the goods that are the subject of procurement.
By 2032, the law established specifics for the procurement of goods that require the customer to comply with the degree of localization of production, which must be equal to or greater than 10% in 2022 and 40% after 2028. The degree of localization of production must be determined by the manufacturer of the goods in accordance with the formula established by law.
During the event, the participants were presented with the generalized results of the survey by the main groups: suppliers of goods, customers of goods, state control and supervision authorities.
In particular, 61.9% of suppliers of goods noted that the introduction of localization had not affected their business at all. This is due to several factors: products not falling under the law, a low localization threshold at the initial stages, and the lack of necessary regulations and explanations from government agencies.
To increase the level of localization, some companies plan to develop their own production of components and equipment (33.3%), while others intend to cooperate with Ukrainian manufacturers (23.8%). However, there are also those who do not intend to take any measures (14.3%). At the same time, more than half of the respondents expressed confidence that by 2028 the level of localization of their products will be at least 40%, while almost a quarter still doubts that they will be able to reach this figure. The full results of the survey can be found here.
The participants of the committee hearings were also presented with the results of monitoring procurement with localization through the Prozoro system, told about the improvement of the mechanism for maintaining the register of localized goods producers, the fight against fraud in the register, measures to monitor compliance with the law, and discussed proposals for possible changes to the legislation on localization.
Popular news
Guarantees of the practice of law
Impunity for public stigmatization of advocates violates the constitutional right to defense
The prohibition of identifying an advocate with a client is an international standard enshrined in the Law «On advocacy and legal practice». However, without accountability, this guarantee does not work, which poses a direct threat to the realization of the right to defense and the principle of adversarial proceedings.
Legislation
Inheritance of a share in joint property and more: advocates have made comments
In the event of the death of one of the subjects of joint shared ownership, the shares of each of the co-owners in the joint shared ownership shall be deemed equal, unless otherwise agreed between them, by law, or by a court decision.
Legislation
Implementation of the Roadmap: the composition of the working group ensures a high level of expertise
The composition of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in relation to advocacy demonstrates the high institutional level of the experts involved by the Ukrainian National Bar Association in the formation of a package of decisions.
Legislation
UNBA initiatives to implement the Roadmap were supported by international experts
International experts who participated in the inaugural meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in advocacy and agreed to join it expressed their support for the initiative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
Legislation
How will the group responsible for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy operate?
The working group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy will operate at several levels: plenary meetings as a platform for adopting framework decisions, a coordination bureau for compiling documents and calendar control, and thematic subgroups for preparing norms and their justification. International experts will verify the results against European standards and «red lines».
Legislation
Advocacy is a responsible entity, not a critic of reform — V. Gvozdiy
The Roadmap on the Rule of Law is not a basis for restructuring the model of advocacy, but a framework for verifying and improving the already European-oriented system. At the same time, part of the work has already been done, so further progress should be made in the form of coordinated and practical decisions.
Legislation
Vatras on the implementation of the Roadmap: only advocates should create their own destiny
Work on implementing the Roadmap in relation to advocacy should be based on the participation of the professional community itself, and key tasks should be structured in such a way as to avoid mixing processes that differ in content and procedure.
Legislation
Lidiya Izovitova outlined the approach to implementing the Roadmap for advocacy
The general approach to working on the implementation of the Roadmap on the Rule of Law in terms of reforming advocacy should not be based on «slogans», but rather on gathering facts, comparing them with standards, consulting with the professional community, and formulating norms for which participants are prepared to take responsibility.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine