UNBA comments on lawyers' «interference» in mobilization processes
Recently, after another scandal, the Volyn Regional Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support stated that lawyers should not interfere with the processes of mobilization and military medical examination. The statement has already been commented on by the National Bar Association of Ukraine.
This is stated in the material of the Law and Business publication.
As a reminder, the TCC cited four arguments:
- The mobilization and medical examination procedures are specialized and require appropriate knowledge and skills possessed by authorized officials and medical specialists.
- The interference of lawyers can lead to a violation of the objectivity and independence of the mobilization and medical examination process.
- The mobilization and medical examination processes are important for national security, and their observance should be beyond the influence of any external persons or organizations.
- In accordance with paragraph 58 of Resolution No. 560 (referring to the Procedure for Conscription of Citizens for Military Service during Mobilization, for a Special Period, approved by the Cabinet of Ministers of 16.05.2024 No. 560 - Ed. ), persons entitled to a deferment must submit documents in person to the head of the TCC and JV Commission.
According to Ihor Kolesnikov, Deputy Chairman of the UNBA Committee on Protection of Advocates' Rights and Guarantees of Legal Practice, the position of the Volyn TCC in relation to advocates does not stand up to any criticism, shows the highest level of legal nihilism in the state since Ukraine's independence, and may also contain signs of a crime under 397 (Interference with the activities of a defense counsel or representative of a person) of the Criminal Code, which cannot be justified by the conditions of martial law.
«The bar is a constitutional institution without which justice is impossible, without which Ukraine cannot be perceived as a state governed by the rule of law. This is an axiom, - he is convinced. - And it is the bar that is tasked by the Constitution with providing professional legal assistance. And this right of citizens cannot be restricted even under martial law. And despite the enormous pressure, lawyers today continue to protect the legal rights of Ukrainian citizens, including during mobilization».
He reminded that in accordance with the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law», while practicing law, an attorney has the right to perform any actions not prohibited by law, the rules of attorneys' ethics and the legal aid agreement, in particular:
- represent and defend the rights, freedoms and interests of individuals in public authorities, enterprises, institutions, organizations regardless of their form of ownership, by officials and officers whose powers include the resolution of relevant issues;
- to get acquainted at the enterprises, institutions and organizations with the documents and materials necessary for the Practice of Law;
- to draw up and submit applications, complaints, petitions and other legal documents;
- to present petitions and complaints at the reception of officials and officers.
«Calling the exercise by a lawyer of his professional rights to protect human rights «interference» with «objective and independent» mobilization procedures is pure Orwellianism, which is an attempt to hide the real problems of the state and society, - says I. Kolesnikov. - Difficulties with obtaining documents, excessive bureaucratization, unprofessionalism of officials, including the employees of the Military Commissariat - aren't these reasons why our citizens are forced to seek professional legal assistance from lawyers? When persons liable for military service feel unprotected, when they cannot get help because their rights and freedoms are violated, how does this affect their motivation to fulfill their constitutional duty to defend the Fatherland? These are the questions we should think about first of all».
Deputy Chairman of the UNBA Committee also noted that the TCC's disregard for the guarantees of the legal profession, in addition to national legislation, also violates international standards set out by the UN Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers. And this indicates pressure and interference in professional activities, which makes it impossible to properly protect human and civil rights and freedoms.
Popular news
Guarantees of the practice of law
Impunity for public stigmatization of advocates violates the constitutional right to defense
The prohibition of identifying an advocate with a client is an international standard enshrined in the Law «On advocacy and legal practice». However, without accountability, this guarantee does not work, which poses a direct threat to the realization of the right to defense and the principle of adversarial proceedings.
Legislation
Inheritance of a share in joint property and more: advocates have made comments
In the event of the death of one of the subjects of joint shared ownership, the shares of each of the co-owners in the joint shared ownership shall be deemed equal, unless otherwise agreed between them, by law, or by a court decision.
Legislation
Implementation of the Roadmap: the composition of the working group ensures a high level of expertise
The composition of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in relation to advocacy demonstrates the high institutional level of the experts involved by the Ukrainian National Bar Association in the formation of a package of decisions.
Legislation
UNBA initiatives to implement the Roadmap were supported by international experts
International experts who participated in the inaugural meeting of the Working Group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in advocacy and agreed to join it expressed their support for the initiative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
Legislation
How will the group responsible for implementing the Roadmap for advocacy operate?
The working group on the implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law in the area of advocacy will operate at several levels: plenary meetings as a platform for adopting framework decisions, a coordination bureau for compiling documents and calendar control, and thematic subgroups for preparing norms and their justification. International experts will verify the results against European standards and «red lines».
Legislation
Advocacy is a responsible entity, not a critic of reform — V. Gvozdiy
The Roadmap on the Rule of Law is not a basis for restructuring the model of advocacy, but a framework for verifying and improving the already European-oriented system. At the same time, part of the work has already been done, so further progress should be made in the form of coordinated and practical decisions.
Legislation
Vatras on the implementation of the Roadmap: only advocates should create their own destiny
Work on implementing the Roadmap in relation to advocacy should be based on the participation of the professional community itself, and key tasks should be structured in such a way as to avoid mixing processes that differ in content and procedure.
Legislation
Lidiya Izovitova outlined the approach to implementing the Roadmap for advocacy
The general approach to working on the implementation of the Roadmap on the Rule of Law in terms of reforming advocacy should not be based on «slogans», but rather on gathering facts, comparing them with standards, consulting with the professional community, and formulating norms for which participants are prepared to take responsibility.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine