Is it time to change approaches to bringing businesses to criminal liability?
The institution of criminal liability of legal entities, introduced in 2014, is ineffective. For example, the list of sanctions that can be imposed on businesses is quite limited and unbalanced.
For these reasons, in order to fundamentally change the approach to holding a legal entity liable for committing a criminal offense on its behalf or in its interests, a group of MPs registered in the Parliament the draft Law No. 11443 dated 25.07.2024 «On Amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine, the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine and Other Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Bringing Legal Entities Liability for Corruption Criminal Offenses in Line with International Standards».
The document proposes to provide for grounds for applying criminal law measures to a legal entity regardless of bringing an individual to justice, expanding the list of criminal law measures and increasing the amount of a fine that may be applied to a legal entity, and the possibility of applying special confiscation based on a court order to apply criminal law measures.
It is also envisaged that the legal entity will be subject to additional (non-financial) criminal law measures. It is a rather broad list of prohibitions on activities for a certain period, namely:
1) to participate in public procurement;
2) to use a license;
3) participate in the privatization of state and municipal property;
4) participate in the lease of state and municipal property (including the extension of the lease agreement);
5) obtain and extend a special permit for subsoil use (including suspension of a special permit for subsoil use);
6) participate in the bodies of social tripartite dialog;
7) purchase bonds of internal state loans of Ukraine;
8) create and participate in the work of self-regulatory organizations;
9) to provide and receive advertising;
10) to carry out sponsorship;
11) participate in public-private partnerships;
12) participate in joint ventures.
In addition, non-financial measures of a criminal law nature will include temporary restrictions on the following rights and benefits:
1) to receive any benefits and assets from the state and the community;
2) to attract, use, and utilize funds from international technical projects and international financial transactions;
3) to receive state aid by business entities (to be a recipient of state aid);
4) acquire the status of a resident of Diia City;
5) receive state and other financial support for export activities.
The Ukrainian National Bar Association's Committee on Anti-Corruption Policy and Compliance, having analyzed the draft, concluded that such a legislative initiative could be widely applied to an unlimited number of cases and business entities, including those of good standing. As a result, it will increase the pressure on business many times over.
In today's reality, when business is already struggling, implementing the provisions of the law as drafted will inevitably lead to a freeze in business activity with all the negative consequences that this entails. And these potentially negative risks outweigh the benefits of implementing the proposed rules by several times.
Therefore, the UNBA concludes, it is advisable to postpone the adoption of the draft law for another time.
Popular news
Legislation
Advocates have warned that the draft Labor Code would curtail workers' protections
Certain provisions of the draft Labor Code of Ukraine regarding collective labor disputes undermine labor protections and do not comply with constitutional and international standards.
Educational events
The right of minors to marry: how judicial oversight works
The issue of granting minors the right to marry lies at the intersection of family law, child protection, and judicial discretion. The UNBA Committee on family law dedicated a webinar held on March 30 to this very topic.
Self-government
BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession
The Bar Council of Ukraine has concluded that, in its recent decisions, the High Council of Justice has, without legal grounds, called into question the right of bar self-governing bodies to protect the guarantees of legal practice and has, in effect, attempted to grant one of its members — who retains the status of an advocate — special immunity from the Rules of professional conduct and disciplinary responsibility.
Announcements
The Bar Council of Ukraine begins its meeting
Today, April 2, a meeting of the Bar Council of Ukraine is taking place in Kyiv. On the agenda are issues related to the activities of bar self-governing bodies, consideration of a decision by the High Council of Justice, a number of appeals, as well as a discussion of the current state and pressing issues regarding the functioning of the legal aid system.
Interaction
The UNBA and the National Guard have agreed to cooperate on legal protection for military personnel
Servicemembers of the National Guard, their family members, and veterans are to receive additional legal tools to protect their rights, while the National Guard’s legal services will receive methodological and expert support.
Interaction
Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation
Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.
Discussion
New Labor Code: advocates highlight the strengths and risks of the draft
The draft Labor Code contains a number of progressive provisions aimed at modernizing labor legislation: digitizing procedures, expanding forms of employment, and increasing transparency in wage payments. At the same time, certain systemic issues require further refinement.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates