If a lawyer has not stopped his activity, he is not unemployed – SC
The fact that a person has the right to practice law makes it impossible to grant him or her unemployment status and appropriate benefits.
This conclusion was reached by the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court in case No. 761/38813/21 (resolution dated 28.08.2024 is available in the Unified State Register of Court Decisions).
A person filed an application for unemployment status through the Diia Unified Electronic Services Portal. In the application, he stated that due to the lack of work, he had no earnings or other income provided for by law, was not self-sufficient, did not receive a pension on preferential terms, and was not a member of a personal farm, a farmer or a member of a farm.
By order of the employment center, the man was granted unemployment benefits as an insured person, taking into account his insurance period.
Later, the Center found that the person was registered with the Bar Council of Kyiv Oblast and, during the period of being registered with the employment center as unemployed, had the right to practice law as an individual attorney. The man's registration as unemployed was terminated due to the fact that the person had submitted false data and documents, in particular, a certificate of the right to practice law. The payment of his allowance was terminated, and a decision was made to return the financial support already accrued and paid.
Then the lawyer filed a lawsuit and the case went to the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court.
In particular, the court referred to the provisions of the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law» stating that a lawyer who practices law and works individually is a self-employed person.
And in accordance with Article 4 of the Law «On Employment of the Population», the employed population includes persons who provide themselves with work on their own.
The high judges also emphasized that a lawyer has the right to terminate his or her practice at any time at his or her own discretion and without giving specific reasons, after which he or she loses the status of a person engaged in independent professional activity and, accordingly, a self-employed person, since such a lawyer has no right to practice law (Article 31 of the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law»).
There was no information in the case file on the suspension or termination of the advocate's right to practice law.
Article 45 of the Law «On Employment of the Population» stipulates that the registration of an unemployed person is terminated, in particular, in the event of: employment of a person or establishment of the fact that a person has submitted false data and documents.
Given that a person has a job and is entitled to practice law, he or she cannot be recognized as unemployed, the court ruled. The Grand Chamber rejected the plaintiff's arguments that he did not receive any income from practicing law, as the person's right to practice law makes it impossible to grant him unemployment status and appropriate benefits.
The references to the fact that the lawyer had confirmed compliance with all the criteria for unemployment status were also found to be untenable. Here, the EP noted that the plaintiff, when applying for unemployment status, misled the employment center about providing employment by stating «I do not provide myself with work on my own».
Popular news
Practice of law
BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases
In legal practice, it is not uncommon for court hearings in different cases to be scheduled at the same time. This raises the question: which case should the advocate attend first, and can the court interfere with this decision?
Edition
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions
The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.
Announcements
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun
The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».
Abroad
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?
Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.
Discussion
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability
On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.
Abroad
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues
The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel
The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.
Self-government
Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly
A unitary state requires uniform standards for access to the profession and disciplinary responsibility, which is why the Ukrainian National Bar Association acts as a professional organization. Accusations of monopoly are false, because public associations cannot replace professional self-government.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences