If a lawyer has not stopped his activity, he is not unemployed – SC

The fact that a person has the right to practice law makes it impossible to grant him or her unemployment status and appropriate benefits.
This conclusion was reached by the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court in case No. 761/38813/21 (resolution dated 28.08.2024 is available in the Unified State Register of Court Decisions).
A person filed an application for unemployment status through the Diia Unified Electronic Services Portal. In the application, he stated that due to the lack of work, he had no earnings or other income provided for by law, was not self-sufficient, did not receive a pension on preferential terms, and was not a member of a personal farm, a farmer or a member of a farm.
By order of the employment center, the man was granted unemployment benefits as an insured person, taking into account his insurance period.
Later, the Center found that the person was registered with the Bar Council of Kyiv Oblast and, during the period of being registered with the employment center as unemployed, had the right to practice law as an individual attorney. The man's registration as unemployed was terminated due to the fact that the person had submitted false data and documents, in particular, a certificate of the right to practice law. The payment of his allowance was terminated, and a decision was made to return the financial support already accrued and paid.
Then the lawyer filed a lawsuit and the case went to the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court.
In particular, the court referred to the provisions of the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law» stating that a lawyer who practices law and works individually is a self-employed person.
And in accordance with Article 4 of the Law «On Employment of the Population», the employed population includes persons who provide themselves with work on their own.
The high judges also emphasized that a lawyer has the right to terminate his or her practice at any time at his or her own discretion and without giving specific reasons, after which he or she loses the status of a person engaged in independent professional activity and, accordingly, a self-employed person, since such a lawyer has no right to practice law (Article 31 of the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law»).
There was no information in the case file on the suspension or termination of the advocate's right to practice law.
Article 45 of the Law «On Employment of the Population» stipulates that the registration of an unemployed person is terminated, in particular, in the event of: employment of a person or establishment of the fact that a person has submitted false data and documents.
Given that a person has a job and is entitled to practice law, he or she cannot be recognized as unemployed, the court ruled. The Grand Chamber rejected the plaintiff's arguments that he did not receive any income from practicing law, as the person's right to practice law makes it impossible to grant him unemployment status and appropriate benefits.
The references to the fact that the lawyer had confirmed compliance with all the criteria for unemployment status were also found to be untenable. Here, the EP noted that the plaintiff, when applying for unemployment status, misled the employment center about providing employment by stating «I do not provide myself with work on my own».
Popular news

Advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of t…
On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

Advocacy
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession
The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

Advocacy
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure
The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

Advocacy
BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine will appeal to the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, Vasyl Malyuk, regarding the verification of information about «negative trends in the legal profession» disseminated by some media outlets on behalf of the SSU.

Advocacy
Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature
Thirteen member states of the Council of Europe have signed the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate, which was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on March 12, 2025. Four more countries will do so today. Ukraine is not among them.

Advocacy
BCU initiates resolution of the issue of visits by advocates to convicted persons
Article 110 of the Criminal Enforcement Code guarantees convicted persons confidentiality of meetings with their advocate. One of the important elements is the possibility to communicate with an advocate in a room without a solid partition. In practice, this provision of the law is systematically violated.

Advocacy
Advocates, academics, and experts examine problems in forensic examination (video)
The Ukrainian National Bar Association, in cooperation with leading scientific and research institutes of forensic expertise, organized a round table on expert support for legal practice.

Advocacy
Does the mobilization of a lawyer violate the human right to defense - conclusion of the Supreme Court
Article 335 of the CPC provides for the suspension of court proceedings only in cases where the accused was called up for military service during mobilization. However, this provision does not apply to the mobilization of a defense counsel.
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…