Is the peacetime practice of the ECHR not a precedent for Ukrainian courts?

Advocacy
13:14 Mon 30.09.24 337 Reviews
Print

The judicial practice that is currently being formed due to Ukraine's derogation from its obligations under international treaties (the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) is worrying.

This opinion was expressed by Oleksandr Dulsky, Chairman of the Ukrainian National Bar Association's Committee on Integration of the Ukrainian Bar System into the EU, during a roundtable discussion on «Consequences of Ukraine's Derogation from its Obligations under International Treaties: Possibilities of Search by Interpol and Influence on Extradition Procedures».

As a reminder, Presidential Decree No. 64 of 24.02.2022 «On the Introduction of Martial Law» contains a list of articles of the Constitution (30 - 34, 38, 39, 41 - 44, 53), under which rights and freedoms may be temporarily restricted.

Later, a notification was sent to the UN Secretary-General, which declared a specific scope of restrictions with reference to the provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which Ukraine refuses to implement.

The essence of these restrictions is the possibility of compulsory alienation of privately owned property for the needs of the state in accordance with the established procedure, the introduction of curfews and, as a result, the prohibition of movement on the streets and in public places at certain times of the day, the establishment of a special regime of entry and exit, restrictions on the movement of citizens, inspection of belongings, vehicles, luggage, cargo, housing and prohibition of peaceful assemblies, rallies, marches, demonstrations, prohibition or restriction of the choice of place of residence and prohibition of citizens.

However, the practice of applying restrictions by the courts, according to O. Dulsky, is a cause for concern. As an example, he cited a decision made by a Ukrainian court in August 2024. It concerned the application of a preventive measure. The defense referred to a number of ECHR decisions, justifying the lack of reasonable suspicion, as well as the unproven existence of the risks claimed by the procedural opponents.

But the court used this position as one of its arguments. Since Ukraine is in martial law, hostilities are underway, part of the territory of Ukraine is under occupation, and mobilization measures continue in the country, the precedent-setting decisions of the ECHR concerning preventive measures, which the defense referred to in the petition and at the hearing, cannot currently be fully implemented in the practice of national courts. After all, they were adopted in peacetime. And they do not take into account the circumstances of the application of a preventive measure in wartime. At the same time, the issue was considered in Ivano-Frankivsk region, far from the front line.

During the event, the participants also outlined the key problems of extradition issues and shared methods of responding to challenges, discussed mechanisms for protecting persons facing extradition, and considered aspects of Ukraine's cooperation with the International Criminal Police Organization.

Popular news

The HCJ continues to ignore the legal deadlines for forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ

Self-government

The HCJ continues to ignore the legal deadlines for forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ

The High Council of Justice continues to violate the statutory deadlines for forming a new competition commission to select members of the Competition Commission of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

17:18 Mon 23.06.25 115
Another conflict with the TCC: an advocate's leg was broken and his client jumped out of a window

Advocacy

Another conflict with the TCC: an advocate's leg was broken and his client jumped out of a window

On June 19, at the premises of the military medical commission, where a bus from the Krasnograd Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support delivered several people, an incident occurred involving the use of physical force against an advocate.

13:34 Fri 20.06.25 166
Independence of advocacy and accountability of expertise: different models, shared responsibility

Advocacy

Independence of advocacy and accountability of expertise: different models, shared responsibility

Two different models of professional organization coexist in Ukraine: advocacy with established self-government and judicial and expert activities that remain under state control. How can approaches be balanced, the openness of expert opinions ensured, and effective interaction between specialists established?

18:02 Mon 16.06.25 123
The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ

Advocacy

The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of t…

On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

17:29 Fri 13.06.25 158
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession

Advocacy

UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession

The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

14:19 Fri 06.06.25 176
Andriy Osipov appointed head of the Ukrainian State Film Agency

Advocacy

Andriy Osipov appointed head of the Ukrainian State Film Agency

The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine has appointed Andriy Osipov as head of the Ukrainian State Film Agency.

19:38 Fri 30.05.25 116
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure

Advocacy

Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure

The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

16:35 Fri 30.05.25 256
The specifics of translating documents for the UK and Ukraine were explored in a webinar

Advocacy

The specifics of translating documents for the UK and Ukraine were explored in a webinar

In legal practice, document translation is increasingly becoming a subject of attention not only for translators, but also for advocates, courts, and government agencies. What should a translation be like to be legally valid in Ukraine and the UK, what mistakes can ruin a case, and who is responsible for accuracy?

10:46 Thu 22.05.25 105

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл