Is the peacetime practice of the ECHR not a precedent for Ukrainian courts?

The judicial practice that is currently being formed due to Ukraine's derogation from its obligations under international treaties (the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights) is worrying.
This opinion was expressed by Oleksandr Dulsky, Chairman of the Ukrainian National Bar Association's Committee on Integration of the Ukrainian Bar System into the EU, during a roundtable discussion on «Consequences of Ukraine's Derogation from its Obligations under International Treaties: Possibilities of Search by Interpol and Influence on Extradition Procedures».
As a reminder, Presidential Decree No. 64 of 24.02.2022 «On the Introduction of Martial Law» contains a list of articles of the Constitution (30 - 34, 38, 39, 41 - 44, 53), under which rights and freedoms may be temporarily restricted.
Later, a notification was sent to the UN Secretary-General, which declared a specific scope of restrictions with reference to the provisions of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which Ukraine refuses to implement.
The essence of these restrictions is the possibility of compulsory alienation of privately owned property for the needs of the state in accordance with the established procedure, the introduction of curfews and, as a result, the prohibition of movement on the streets and in public places at certain times of the day, the establishment of a special regime of entry and exit, restrictions on the movement of citizens, inspection of belongings, vehicles, luggage, cargo, housing and prohibition of peaceful assemblies, rallies, marches, demonstrations, prohibition or restriction of the choice of place of residence and prohibition of citizens.
However, the practice of applying restrictions by the courts, according to O. Dulsky, is a cause for concern. As an example, he cited a decision made by a Ukrainian court in August 2024. It concerned the application of a preventive measure. The defense referred to a number of ECHR decisions, justifying the lack of reasonable suspicion, as well as the unproven existence of the risks claimed by the procedural opponents.
But the court used this position as one of its arguments. Since Ukraine is in martial law, hostilities are underway, part of the territory of Ukraine is under occupation, and mobilization measures continue in the country, the precedent-setting decisions of the ECHR concerning preventive measures, which the defense referred to in the petition and at the hearing, cannot currently be fully implemented in the practice of national courts. After all, they were adopted in peacetime. And they do not take into account the circumstances of the application of a preventive measure in wartime. At the same time, the issue was considered in Ivano-Frankivsk region, far from the front line.
During the event, the participants also outlined the key problems of extradition issues and shared methods of responding to challenges, discussed mechanisms for protecting persons facing extradition, and considered aspects of Ukraine's cooperation with the International Criminal Police Organization.
Popular news

Advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of t…
On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

Advocacy
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession
The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

Advocacy
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure
The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

Advocacy
BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine will appeal to the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, Vasyl Malyuk, regarding the verification of information about «negative trends in the legal profession» disseminated by some media outlets on behalf of the SSU.

Advocacy
Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature
Thirteen member states of the Council of Europe have signed the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate, which was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on March 12, 2025. Four more countries will do so today. Ukraine is not among them.

Advocacy
BCU initiates resolution of the issue of visits by advocates to convicted persons
Article 110 of the Criminal Enforcement Code guarantees convicted persons confidentiality of meetings with their advocate. One of the important elements is the possibility to communicate with an advocate in a room without a solid partition. In practice, this provision of the law is systematically violated.

Advocacy
Advocates, academics, and experts examine problems in forensic examination (video)
The Ukrainian National Bar Association, in cooperation with leading scientific and research institutes of forensic expertise, organized a round table on expert support for legal practice.

Advocacy
Does the mobilization of a lawyer violate the human right to defense - conclusion of the Supreme Court
Article 335 of the CPC provides for the suspension of court proceedings only in cases where the accused was called up for military service during mobilization. However, this provision does not apply to the mobilization of a defense counsel.
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…