How can a lawyer file documents when the E-court is up?
Over the past few months, the E-court subsystem of the Unified Judicial Information and Communication System (UJICS) has become more frequent. The service is very slow or the page is unavailable. This creates obstacles to the practice of law.
The Ukrainian National Bar Association drew attention to this problem in a letter to the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy and the High Council of Justice.
Earlier, the legislation introduced the obligation for parties to proceedings to register electronic accounts in the UJICS and determined the procedure for the court to serve documents in cases exclusively in electronic form by sending them to the electronic account (Laws No. 3200-IX of June 29, 2023 and No. 3424-IX of October 19, 2023).
Attorneys have also registered electronic offices in the E-court to receive and submit documents to the court. System malfunctions, problems with power supply, and Internet instability significantly affect their ability to organize their work. At the same time, these obstacles are not always accepted by the court as grounds for postponing the court hearing or extending the deadline for submitting procedural documents.
Art. 14 of the CPC, Art. 6 of the EPC, Art. 18 of the CAP stipulate that in the conditions of martial law or a state of emergency, in case of a power outage in the court or other circumstances that make it impossible for the UJICS to function, the court may serve any documents in cases in which such a person participates in paper form to the person who has registered the electronic cabinet.
Today, the procedural legislation defines two forms of submitting documents to the court for entities that have electronic offices in the UJICS: paper and electronic (through the E-court subsystem).
At the same time, there are cases when a procedural document needs to be submitted to the court urgently or the location of a party to the case is outside the location of postal services.
In view of these circumstances, it would be worth supplementing the procedural legislation with a provision stating that in case of confirmation of the technical impossibility of using the E-Court subsystem, a party to a case who is obliged to submit documents in electronic form exclusively using the electronic cabinet in the UJICS may submit procedural documents signed with a qualified electronic signature and evidence of the impossibility of using the E-Court subsystem to the official e-mail address of the court.
For the full text of the UNBA's proposals, please follow the link.
Popular news
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ukraine has signed the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer
Today, on 9 March, Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi signed the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. This makes our country the 28th to sign this important international treaty.
European integration
A translation of the report on advocacy presented to the European Parliament has been published
A translation of a research report on the Ukrainian advocacy profession in wartime, previously presented to the European Parliament in Brussels, has been published. The document is presented as a basis for discussion on the rule of law, Ukraine's European integration aspirations, and countering Russian disinformation in the legal sphere.
Legal defence of military personnel
How to formalize discharge from military service: practical workshop
The issue of discharge from military service remains one of the most pressing and complex for Ukrainian defenders and their families. Due to constant changes in legislation, military personnel often face refusals to discharge them from service or even to consider their reports.
Legislation
The Verkhovna Rada Committee criticized the format of the government working group on advocacy
The implementation of the Roadmap on the rule of law (approved by Cabinet of Ministers Resolution No. 475-r of May 14, 2025) in relation to advocacy raises the practical question of who exactly should prepare legislative changes and how.
Self-government
The BCU demands a review of the composition of the government working group on reforming the advocacy profession
The President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova, appealed to the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine to review the composition of the working group on improving legislation in the field of advocacy and legal practice.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The President has determined, who will sign the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer
President of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenskyy authorized Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi to sign the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.
Abroad
Advocate's romance with prosecutor halts criminal case in Canada
In Montreal (Quebec, Canada), a court suspended proceedings against eight defendants accused of illegal cannabis trafficking and money laundering after it was revealed that the prosecutor in the case and one of the advocates were in a secret intimate relationship.
Legislation
After the war amnesty for criminals or exemption from responsibility?
To ensure national reconciliation, rehabilitation of persons who have been persecuted for political reasons, restoration of justice, and establishment of lasting peace, it is proposed to introduce an amnesty after the war.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates