How can a lawyer file documents when the E-court is up?
Over the past few months, the E-court subsystem of the Unified Judicial Information and Communication System (UJICS) has become more frequent. The service is very slow or the page is unavailable. This creates obstacles to the practice of law.
The Ukrainian National Bar Association drew attention to this problem in a letter to the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy and the High Council of Justice.
Earlier, the legislation introduced the obligation for parties to proceedings to register electronic accounts in the UJICS and determined the procedure for the court to serve documents in cases exclusively in electronic form by sending them to the electronic account (Laws No. 3200-IX of June 29, 2023 and No. 3424-IX of October 19, 2023).
Attorneys have also registered electronic offices in the E-court to receive and submit documents to the court. System malfunctions, problems with power supply, and Internet instability significantly affect their ability to organize their work. At the same time, these obstacles are not always accepted by the court as grounds for postponing the court hearing or extending the deadline for submitting procedural documents.
Art. 14 of the CPC, Art. 6 of the EPC, Art. 18 of the CAP stipulate that in the conditions of martial law or a state of emergency, in case of a power outage in the court or other circumstances that make it impossible for the UJICS to function, the court may serve any documents in cases in which such a person participates in paper form to the person who has registered the electronic cabinet.
Today, the procedural legislation defines two forms of submitting documents to the court for entities that have electronic offices in the UJICS: paper and electronic (through the E-court subsystem).
At the same time, there are cases when a procedural document needs to be submitted to the court urgently or the location of a party to the case is outside the location of postal services.
In view of these circumstances, it would be worth supplementing the procedural legislation with a provision stating that in case of confirmation of the technical impossibility of using the E-Court subsystem, a party to a case who is obliged to submit documents in electronic form exclusively using the electronic cabinet in the UJICS may submit procedural documents signed with a qualified electronic signature and evidence of the impossibility of using the E-Court subsystem to the official e-mail address of the court.
For the full text of the UNBA's proposals, please follow the link.
Popular news
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ombudsman calls for a firm response to violence against advocates
Every instance of obstruction of an advocate’s lawful activities, use of physical force, delaying an investigation, or concealment of evidence must be subject to a proper legal assessment. The state is obligated to ensure that the right to a defense is a genuine guarantee.
Greetings
The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice
Denis Maslov’s many years of experience as a advocate, his work as a judge and his tenure as chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine’s Committee on legal policy have given him a deep understanding of how the legal system functions and the challenges it faces.
Legislation
The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy
The section on advocacy and legal aid in the draft anti-corruption strategy for 2026–2030 goes beyond the scope of anti-corruption policy and is inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU
An advocate’s membership in the UNBA is an element of professional status arising by virtue of law, rather than a voluntary private membership in an association. Therefore, failure to disclose it in a declaration should not automatically lead to the conclusion of unethical conduct or the concealment of a private interest.
Discussion
The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture
To mark Ukraine’s Constitution Day, the Center for research on the legal profession and law of the UNBA in collaboration with the «Bykivnia Graves» National Historical and Memorial Reserve organized an online lecture on the history of the Ukrainian constitutional process.
Legislation
The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer
The ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer must be accompanied by targeted amendments to legislation to strengthen safeguards for advocates, but should not be used as a pretext for dismantling the self-governing model of advocacy.
Legal defence of military personnel
Advocates are expanding their legal support for the military and affected businesses
Legal assistance for military personnel should begin with simple and quick consultations, but it should not end there. Typical requests from brigades are compiled into summaries, digital services and proposals to government agencies.
Interaction
A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative
On June 24, as part of European Legal Sovereignty Day, which took place in Brussels, the Manifesto for a Referential of Human Guarantee in the Legal Use of AI was presented.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates