AI regulation in Ukraine: what has already been done
As part of the three-year Roadmap for the Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Ukraine, the Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine presented a White Paper that provides specific tools for businesses to use AI.
Sergiy Barbashyn, Chairman of the UNBA NextGen, shared the experience of introducing artificial intelligence in Ukraine and the state's experience in developing future legislation on AI regulation with foreign colleagues during the European Young Bar Association International Weekend 2024, which took place on September 26-29, 2024 in London (UK).
He said that last fall, the Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine presented the Roadmap for Artificial Intelligence Regulation in Ukraine, which should help Ukrainian companies prepare for the adoption of a law similar to the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act and educate citizens on how to protect themselves from AI risks.
In June of this year, the Roadmap presented a White Paper detailing the approach to artificial intelligence regulation in Ukraine. This document will help companies understand how to prepare for future AI legislation and create products that are safe for citizens.
S. Barbashyn reminded which groups are covered by the AI Act, which was adopted in March 2024 by the European Parliament:
- AI developers are companies, organizations, or individuals that develop artificial intelligence systems. They must comply with the rules on the design, development, and monitoring of AI systems.
- AI suppliers: Those who provide or sell AI-based products in the EU. They must ensure that their AI systems comply with the AI Act.
- AI users are organizations or individuals that use AI systems. Depending on the risk associated with the use of such systems, they may be subject to certain restrictions or monitoring and reporting requirements.
He also drew attention to the risks associated with the use of AI. The AI Act's classification of AI systems by risk level is critical to protecting users and society from potential dangers associated with the use of AI. The establishment of four risk groups allows for the determination of the level of oversight and regulation for each category of systems. Systems with an unacceptable risk are prohibited altogether due to the threat to fundamental human rights, while high-risk systems are subject to strict testing and compliance requirements. This minimizes the likelihood of negative consequences and ensures the safety of users.
This classification also allows regulators and businesses to clearly delineate responsibilities depending on the risk level of AI systems. Companies using high-risk systems should be prepared for additional transparency, risk management, and certification requirements. This is important to maintain user trust and avoid legal issues. At the same time, systems with limited and minimal risk do not need such strict requirements, but must provide a sufficient level of transparency and information.
«Knowledge of these four risk categories allows businesses to properly assess potential threats and plan the implementation of AI technologies accordingly. The correct classification of AI systems helps not only to avoid fines and reputational risks but also promotes the development of ethical and safe use of artificial intelligence in various fields of activity», - summarized S. Barbashyn.
Popular news
Legislation
A bill implementing the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer has been introduced
The constitutional guarantees of legal aid, defense, and the independence of advocacy cannot be realized without protecting advocates from unwarranted interference in their professional activities, including searches, the seizure of professional materials and the use of criminal procedural mechanisms to exert pressure.
Abroad
The CCBE is discussing European justice and issues related to the protection of advocates
Today, October 2, a meeting of the Standing Committee of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) is taking place in Brussels. On the agenda are the protection of the advocate profession, the rule of law, attorney-client privilege, and changes in the European justice system.
Rule of Law Roadmap
The UNBA presented the key provisions of the future law on advocacy in Brussels
The Ukrainian National Bar Association presented its proposals for the upcoming law on advocacy, aligned with the Rule of Law Roadmap. The presentation covered topics such as access to the profession, self-governance, disciplinary procedures, professional development and guarantees for the practice of advocacy.
Educational events
Advocates were taught to voice their complaints without making accusations
In a difficult conversation, it’s easy to confuse facts with opinions, feelings with accusations, and requests with demands. How can you express dissatisfaction, explain your own needs, and propose a specific solution while still allowing your conversation partner the opportunity to refuse or suggest an alternative?
Guarantees of the practice of law
Unrestricted access to advocates' accounts poses a risk of client data disclosure — BCU
Information regarding transactions in the bank accounts of an advocate, a law firm, or a bar association from which clients can be identified, as well as the fact and subject matter of a request for legal assistance, the purpose of payments, and the amount of the fee constitutes attorney-client privilege. This rule applies regardless of whether the information also constitutes banking information and is in the possession of a bank.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The contract provides for a video conference, but the court requires in-person appearance: how should an advocate proceed?
Many advocates today work remotely; therefore, their agreements with clients provide for the provision of legal assistance via videoconferencing. However, this form of work does not, in and of itself, create an unconditional obligation for the court to conduct every hearing via videoconference.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Independent oversight is necessary before using CISA materials against an advocate – Lidiya Izovitova
Before the prosecution uses information obtained during covert investigative actions and related to an advocate’s activities, independent procedural oversight must be conducted. It is necessary to determine whether such information is covered by attorney-client privilege and whether it may be disclosed.
Legislation
Handing over a bank card should not automatically constitute a crime – UNBA
Criminal liability for transferring a bank card or access to an account should arise only if it is proven that the person knew the card or account would be used as a means to commit an intentional crime. The mere fact that a payment instrument was transferred or that an account was used by a third party is not sufficient.
Publications
Vasyl Kolishnyi, «Law and Business» Supporting mental health should become part of the professional culture of the Bar, - H. Udovenko
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
