AI regulation in Ukraine: what has already been done
As part of the three-year Roadmap for the Regulation of Artificial Intelligence in Ukraine, the Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine presented a White Paper that provides specific tools for businesses to use AI.
Sergiy Barbashyn, Chairman of the UNBA NextGen, shared the experience of introducing artificial intelligence in Ukraine and the state's experience in developing future legislation on AI regulation with foreign colleagues during the European Young Bar Association International Weekend 2024, which took place on September 26-29, 2024 in London (UK).
He said that last fall, the Ministry of Digital Transformation of Ukraine presented the Roadmap for Artificial Intelligence Regulation in Ukraine, which should help Ukrainian companies prepare for the adoption of a law similar to the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act and educate citizens on how to protect themselves from AI risks.
In June of this year, the Roadmap presented a White Paper detailing the approach to artificial intelligence regulation in Ukraine. This document will help companies understand how to prepare for future AI legislation and create products that are safe for citizens.
S. Barbashyn reminded which groups are covered by the AI Act, which was adopted in March 2024 by the European Parliament:
- AI developers are companies, organizations, or individuals that develop artificial intelligence systems. They must comply with the rules on the design, development, and monitoring of AI systems.
- AI suppliers: Those who provide or sell AI-based products in the EU. They must ensure that their AI systems comply with the AI Act.
- AI users are organizations or individuals that use AI systems. Depending on the risk associated with the use of such systems, they may be subject to certain restrictions or monitoring and reporting requirements.
He also drew attention to the risks associated with the use of AI. The AI Act's classification of AI systems by risk level is critical to protecting users and society from potential dangers associated with the use of AI. The establishment of four risk groups allows for the determination of the level of oversight and regulation for each category of systems. Systems with an unacceptable risk are prohibited altogether due to the threat to fundamental human rights, while high-risk systems are subject to strict testing and compliance requirements. This minimizes the likelihood of negative consequences and ensures the safety of users.
This classification also allows regulators and businesses to clearly delineate responsibilities depending on the risk level of AI systems. Companies using high-risk systems should be prepared for additional transparency, risk management, and certification requirements. This is important to maintain user trust and avoid legal issues. At the same time, systems with limited and minimal risk do not need such strict requirements, but must provide a sufficient level of transparency and information.
«Knowledge of these four risk categories allows businesses to properly assess potential threats and plan the implementation of AI technologies accordingly. The correct classification of AI systems helps not only to avoid fines and reputational risks but also promotes the development of ethical and safe use of artificial intelligence in various fields of activity», - summarized S. Barbashyn.
Popular news
Self-government
BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession
The Bar Council of Ukraine has concluded that, in its recent decisions, the High Council of Justice has, without legal grounds, called into question the right of bar self-governing bodies to protect the guarantees of legal practice and has, in effect, attempted to grant one of its members — who retains the status of an advocate — special immunity from the Rules of professional conduct and disciplinary responsibility.
Interaction
The UNBA and the National Guard have agreed to cooperate on legal protection for military personnel
Servicemembers of the National Guard, their family members, and veterans are to receive additional legal tools to protect their rights, while the National Guard’s legal services will receive methodological and expert support.
Interaction
Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation
Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Discussion
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails
The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».
Rule of Law Roadmap
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change
On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.
Appointment
A representative of the UNBA has arrived in Cairo
Advocate Irena Maria Ostrozka-Sangushko has been appointed as the representative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association in the Arab Republic of Egypt, in the city of Cairo. The corresponding Order No. 80, dated March 10, 2026, was signed by the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
