The annual fee of an advocate in 2025: The BCU has changed the distribution
In 2025, the annual contribution to the bar self-government will continue to be one subsistence minimum for able-bodied persons (UAH 3,028, according to the Law on the State Budget). At the same time, its distribution will change.
The relevant decision was made by the Bar Council of Ukraine at its meeting on December 14.
Taking into account the requirements of the Regulation on these contributions (UNBA decision No. 4 of 03.02.2017), the payment of the contribution is a professional obligation of the advocate. This obligation must be fulfilled by January 31, 2025 by transferring funds in two payments to the bank accounts of the bar self-government bodies.
The new distribution will take into account the number of lawyers in regional councils as a criterion:

This decision was made to ensure the continuous operation of the bar self-government bodies. It is aimed at realizing the constitutional function of the Bar - protection of human rights and provision of quality legal aid guaranteed by the Constitution. The Bar is independent of the state and is not funded from any other sources than the contributions of its members, so a fair and balanced distribution of these contributions is extremely important.
Previously, the majority of the annual fee (70%) remained at the disposal of the regional bar councils without mandatory redistribution to the qualification and disciplinary commissions of the bar. At the same time, the QDCBs were funded in fact only at the expense of persons who passed the qualification exam.
«Such a model did not guarantee stability and predictability of their work, since the QDCBs perform not only qualification but also disciplinary functions. As a result, in a number of regions there was a financial imbalance: some bar councils accumulated significant balances, while other bar self-government bodies were practically unable to properly fulfill their powers, - explained Maksym Boldin, the head of the Higher Audit Commission of the Bar. - The purpose of the new mechanism is to balance resources between regions, support the CDC and ensure the smooth operation of the entire bar self-government system».
The head of the HACB emphasized that nothing has changed for lawyers: neither in terms of the amount nor the timing of the fee payment. The fee is still paid in full, but it will be distributed among various bodies in a new proportion. And any statements about alleged «additional payments» or alleged «funds taken away from someone» are groundless.
M. Boldin also said that the additional funds to be received by the UNBA will be used not only to support the High Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar and small regional bodies, but also to finance the activities of regional representatives in the national bar self-government bodies - the Bar Council of Ukraine and the HQDCB. «This approach makes it impossible for these members to depend on regional councils and eliminates the risk of conflicts of interest. In particular, this is important when considering disciplinary complaints between lawyers from different regions, where transparent and impartial funding from the center will promote objectivity and independence, - he explained. - This is a fair equalization of the financial support of the system, designed to prevent destabilization and ensure the effective, independent and fair functioning of the bar throughout Ukraine».
Popular news
Discussion
Law and feelings: advocates explore contemporary challenges in family law
Marriage and divorce are not only legal procedures, but also social phenomena that require a responsible approach. The UNBA Committee on family law organized and held a professional discussion on the topic «Conscious» marriage and «prudent» divorce: challenges, risks, consequences».
Practice of law
BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases
In legal practice, it is not uncommon for court hearings in different cases to be scheduled at the same time. This raises the question: which case should the advocate attend first, and can the court interfere with this decision?
Edition
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions
The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.
Announcements
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun
The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».
Abroad
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?
Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.
Discussion
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability
On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.
Abroad
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues
The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel
The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences