In Illinois regulates the use of AI by judges and lawyers
The use of artificial intelligence in court is allowed even without disclosure of this fact, but subject to compliance with legal and ethical standards. At the same time, lawyers, judges and self-represented parties are responsible for the final product of their work.
On January 1, 2025, the Illinois Supreme Court Policy on Artificial Intelligence will come into effect.
The document states that the integration of AI into court operations is becoming more widespread, offering potential opportunities for increased efficiency and improved access to justice. However, it also raises critical questions about the authenticity, accuracy, bias, and integrity of court documents, evidence, and decisions. Understanding the capabilities and limitations of AI technologies is important for the judiciary.
Courts will be closely monitoring AI technologies that may threaten due process, equal protection, or access to justice. Unconfirmed or intentionally misleading content generated by AI that promotes bias, harms litigants, or impedes truth and decision-making will not be tolerated.
The use of AI by litigants, attorneys, judges, court reporters, legal advisors, and court staff should not be discouraged and is permitted, provided it complies with legal and ethical standards. Disclosure of the use of AI in court filings is not mandatory.
The Rules of Professional Conduct and the Code of Judicial Ethics are fully applicable to the use of AI technologies. Lawyers, judges, and self-represented parties are responsible for the final product of their work. All users should carefully review AI-generated content before submitting it in a court proceeding to ensure accuracy and compliance with legal and ethical obligations. Before using any technology, including generative AI applications, users should understand both the general capabilities of AI and the features of specific tools.
The Court recognizes the need to use AI in a safe manner, respecting privacy laws and regulations. AI programs should not jeopardize sensitive information such as confidential communications, personal data, protected health information, justice and public safety data, security-related information, or data that violates judicial ethics standards or undermines public confidence.
The Illinois Supreme Court promises to regularly review the policy as these technologies evolve, prioritizing public confidence in the judicial system and the administration of justice. Judges remain ultimately responsible for their decisions, regardless of technological advances.
The Delaware Supreme Court reportedly issued a similar policy for judges and other judicial officials in October, and other state and federal courts have created committees and task forces to study the impact of AI on the judiciary.
Popular news
Support
Protecting the legal profession, cybersecurity and support for advocates: common themes for the IBA and the UNBA
On September 18, a working meeting was held at the office of the Ukrainian National Bar Association with Executive Director of the International Bar Association (IBA) Mark Ellis. The parties discussed the Ukrainian advocacy profession’s participation in European legal processes, the protection of the UNBA’s digital infrastructure, psychological support for advocates and future areas of cooperation.
War
Are Europe's advocacy associations prepared for a potential war? V. Gvozdiy shared lessons from the Ukrainian experience
The continuity of the bar’s self-governance, the protection of professional registries and archives, as well as equal guarantees of employment for advocates, judges, and prosecutors must be enshrined in advance in legislation in the event of war or another emergency.
Educational events
How DISC helps manage «tigers», «monkeys», «elephants» and «turtles»
The same instruction from a manager may motivate one employee to take action, while leaving another without the necessary guidance. People perceive work tasks differently: for some, a deadline and the expected outcome are enough, while others need explanations, time or a detailed plan.
Legislation
The Verkhovna Rada is preparing a bill to implement the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer
Members of Parliament plan to introduce a bill in the near future to implement the main provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer. This parliamentary initiative may also prompt the government to expedite the preparation of the ratification package.
Educational events
What an advocate should consider when a fee dispute escalates into a complaint to the QDBC
If an advocate files a lawsuit seeking to recover fees from a client, the client may in turn file a complaint with the High Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar in an effort to compel the advocate to withdraw the lawsuit. How do the advocacy’s disciplinary bodies handle such cases?
Edition
Veteran-advocates returning to the practice of law: the UNBA has prepared recommendations
Military service is incompatible with the practice of law; therefore, an advocate suspends their practice for the duration of their service. However, upon returning, they must reinstate their right to practice law, refresh their knowledge and reestablish their organizational and digital processes.
Educational events
Energy, focus and priorities: how an advocate should plan their day
A rigid workday schedule becomes irrelevant when your routine depends on air raid alerts and disrupted sleep caused by nighttime explosions. Under such conditions, advocates should assess the resources they can actually manage.
Discussion
Appeals by NGOs and advocates' access to the SLC were discussed with the State Geocadastre
Advocates’ access to data from the State Land Cadastre remains limited: there is no separate access, and a court order is required to obtain coordinates. At the same time, the functionality for generating extracts from the State Land Cadastre as of a specific date still needs further refinement. The State Geocadastre is working on this.
Publications
Vasyl Kolishnyi, «Law and Business» Supporting mental health should become part of the professional culture of the Bar, - H. Udovenko
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
