In Illinois regulates the use of AI by judges and lawyers
The use of artificial intelligence in court is allowed even without disclosure of this fact, but subject to compliance with legal and ethical standards. At the same time, lawyers, judges and self-represented parties are responsible for the final product of their work.
On January 1, 2025, the Illinois Supreme Court Policy on Artificial Intelligence will come into effect.
The document states that the integration of AI into court operations is becoming more widespread, offering potential opportunities for increased efficiency and improved access to justice. However, it also raises critical questions about the authenticity, accuracy, bias, and integrity of court documents, evidence, and decisions. Understanding the capabilities and limitations of AI technologies is important for the judiciary.
Courts will be closely monitoring AI technologies that may threaten due process, equal protection, or access to justice. Unconfirmed or intentionally misleading content generated by AI that promotes bias, harms litigants, or impedes truth and decision-making will not be tolerated.
The use of AI by litigants, attorneys, judges, court reporters, legal advisors, and court staff should not be discouraged and is permitted, provided it complies with legal and ethical standards. Disclosure of the use of AI in court filings is not mandatory.
The Rules of Professional Conduct and the Code of Judicial Ethics are fully applicable to the use of AI technologies. Lawyers, judges, and self-represented parties are responsible for the final product of their work. All users should carefully review AI-generated content before submitting it in a court proceeding to ensure accuracy and compliance with legal and ethical obligations. Before using any technology, including generative AI applications, users should understand both the general capabilities of AI and the features of specific tools.
The Court recognizes the need to use AI in a safe manner, respecting privacy laws and regulations. AI programs should not jeopardize sensitive information such as confidential communications, personal data, protected health information, justice and public safety data, security-related information, or data that violates judicial ethics standards or undermines public confidence.
The Illinois Supreme Court promises to regularly review the policy as these technologies evolve, prioritizing public confidence in the judicial system and the administration of justice. Judges remain ultimately responsible for their decisions, regardless of technological advances.
The Delaware Supreme Court reportedly issued a similar policy for judges and other judicial officials in October, and other state and federal courts have created committees and task forces to study the impact of AI on the judiciary.
Popular news
War
Are Europe's advocacy associations prepared for a potential war? V. Gvozdiy shared lessons from the Ukrainian experience
The continuity of the bar’s self-governance, the protection of professional registries and archives, as well as equal guarantees of employment for advocates, judges, and prosecutors must be enshrined in advance in legislation in the event of war or another emergency.
Educational events
How DISC helps manage «tigers», «monkeys», «elephants» and «turtles»
The same instruction from a manager may motivate one employee to take action, while leaving another without the necessary guidance. People perceive work tasks differently: for some, a deadline and the expected outcome are enough, while others need explanations, time or a detailed plan.
Legislation
The Verkhovna Rada is preparing a bill to implement the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer
Members of Parliament plan to introduce a bill in the near future to implement the main provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer. This parliamentary initiative may also prompt the government to expedite the preparation of the ratification package.
Greetings
The UNBA honored the winners of the «In the language of prose» contest and opened a fashion exhibition
The competition was organized by the UNBA Committee on humanitarian issues and creative initiatives in cooperation with the Center for advocacy and legal research. Two dozen advocates from various regions of Ukraine submitted their works to the competition committee for consideration. The entries were evaluated based on originality, the relevance of the chosen topic and the level of technical skill.
Discussion
What is holding back funding for gas-fired power generation – discussion between businesses and banks at the UNBA
To provide loans for new gas-fired power generation projects, banks require a predictable cash flow, an investor’s equity contribution, and risk-sharing mechanisms. A business model that relies solely on a preferential gas price is not a sufficient basis for financing.
Educational events
Preparing a court argument: 7 tips for advocates
When preparing a courtroom speech, it is best to begin by formulating the decision the advocate is asking the court to render. Next, the structure of the speech should be built around this outcome, strong arguments should be selected, and weak points should be addressed.
Legislation
Advocates’ access to the TCC and the SP should be regulated by law – Ombudsman
The practice of denying advocates access to the premises of the TCC and the SP bears the hallmarks of systematic obstruction of the legal profession and deprives people of the opportunity to promptly obtain professional legal assistance. The procedure for such access must be codified in regulations issued by the Ministry of Defense.
Legislation
The path to ratification of the Convention must not end in yet another delay — L. Izovitova
Ukraine’s preparations for the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer have already passed key stages. Now, government institutions must submit the matter to the Verkhovna Rada for consideration. In doing so, Ukraine may complete the ratification process faster than EU member states.
Publications
Vasyl Kolishnyi, «Law and Business» Supporting mental health should become part of the professional culture of the Bar, - H. Udovenko
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
