Legal aid during mobilization: TCC sees no problems

Advocacy
12:39 Wed 15.01.25 3100 Reviews
Print

The military authorities claim that the training center or distribution center is not a place of detention. There is normal (taking into account the regime) access, including for lawyers. But practice shows the opposite.

«People do not always understand what the TCC is responsible for, what they are entitled to, what they are not entitled to, what their rights are, what their responsibilities are, where there are violations and where there are no violations», - said Maryna Holub, a representative of the Communications Department of the Land Forces Command. To clarify these issues, the press conference «Rights and Responsibilities of Citizens in Mobilization Issue» was organized.

Answering journalists' questions, Larysa Kozak, deputy head of the Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support, head of the mobilization department of the Holosiivskyi district of Kyiv, denied that the TCCs create any problems in the communication of persons liable for military service.

«A training center or distribution center is not a place of detention. There is a normal admission there, of course, subject to certain restrictions (regimes). But relatives and friends come there, and even lawyers arrive, and full professional legal assistance is provided there, - she noted. - If we are talking about this stage, when they are at the distribution point until they are sent to basic general military training, this is not a place where they are deprived of their liberty or someone is illegally detained and not allowed to go».

Other questions that the TCC representative answered during the event included legislative aspects, notification procedures, police participation in mobilization activities, the problems of so-called busification and mobile checkpoints. The participants also discussed the protection of the rights of the mobilized, including access to communication and the provision of domestic needs. In addition, they explained the peculiarities of mobilization for certain categories of citizens, including those with reservations and people aged 50+. Particular attention was paid to the role of recruiting centers and the possibility of recruiting directly to military units, which avoids applying to the TCC.

However, it seems that the military authorities do not see (or do not want to see) the blatant violations of citizens' rights during mobilization. Including when it comes to the right to professional legal assistance guaranteed to everyone by the Constitution of Ukraine.

We recently mentioned the incident in Kharkiv with lawyer Yulia Palagina. When she began to record violations of her client's rights in the premises of the military medical commission, the lawyer was pushed out of the room by physical force and her belongings were thrown away.

Recently, a similar case occurred in the city of Bucha, Kyiv region. Mariia Naselenko came to the district TCC to provide legal assistance to a person liable for military service who was called in to clarify his information. However, she was not allowed to see her client and was prevented from confidential communication. The lawyer filed a report on the commission of a crime under Article 397 (Interference with the activities of a defense counsel or representative of a person) of the Criminal Code.

When M. Neselenko came back to the TCC the next day, a conflict arose between her and the TCC representatives. One of the officials, according to the lawyer, began to twist her arm, shouting that video recording in the TCC was prohibited. He pushed the woman against the wall, hitting her back and head against the wall.

As a result, the lawyer was hospitalized. She lost her ability to work, and her practice of law was temporarily suspended due to her physical and emotional condition.

The Bar Council of the Kyiv Region reported a violation of the rights of their colleague. The situation has signs of the following criminal offenses

  • obstruction of the activities of a lawyer (Article 397 of the Criminal Code), which manifested itself in the denial of access to a client, violent acts and violation of the lawyer's secrecy
  • intentional infliction of blows and beatings (Article 126 of the Criminal Code);
  • abuse of power (Article 364 of the Criminal Code).

The Bar Council of the region has already appealed to the State Bureau of Investigation to conduct an immediate investigation. The evidence includes medical certificates, a statement by the lawyer herself, and evidence of other offenses by TCC employees.

More information about this situation is available here.

Popular news

The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice

Greetings

The UNBA congratulates Denis Maslov on his appointment as Minister of Justice

Denis Maslov’s many years of experience as a advocate, his work as a judge and his tenure as chairman of the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine’s Committee on legal policy have given him a deep understanding of how the legal system functions and the challenges it faces.

19:43 Thu 16.07.26 123
The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy

Legislation

The Verkhovna Rada explained why the section on advocacy should be removed from the anti-corruption strategy

The section on advocacy and legal aid in the draft anti-corruption strategy for 2026–2030 goes beyond the scope of anti-corruption policy and is inconsistent with the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession.

14:26 Thu 09.07.26 120
The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU

Guarantees of the practice of law

The NACP’s clarification regarding the declaration of membership in the UNBA should be clarified – BCU

An advocate’s membership in the UNBA is an element of professional status arising by virtue of law, rather than a voluntary private membership in an association. Therefore, failure to disclose it in a declaration should not automatically lead to the conclusion of unethical conduct or the concealment of a private interest.

12:28 Fri 03.07.26 174
The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture

Discussion

The history of Ukrainian constitutionalism was discussed during a lecture

To mark Ukraine’s Constitution Day, the Center for research on the legal profession and law of the UNBA in collaboration with the «Bykivnia Graves» National Historical and Memorial Reserve organized an online lecture on the history of the Ukrainian constitutional process.

10:27 Wed 01.07.26 114
The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer

Legislation

The UNBA is counting on the swift ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer

The ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer must be accompanied by targeted amendments to legislation to strengthen safeguards for advocates, but should not be used as a pretext for dismantling the self-governing model of advocacy.

15:54 Tue 30.06.26 189
A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative

Interaction

A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative

On June 24, as part of European Legal Sovereignty Day, which took place in Brussels, the Manifesto for a Referential of Human Guarantee in the Legal Use of AI was presented.

16:59 Fri 26.06.26 260
Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026

Court practice

Martial law has changed administrative disputes – findings from IUS PUBLICUM 2026

During martial law, the focus of administrative proceedings shifted: in addition to tax disputes, cases involving access to public information, personal data protection, and challenges to regulatory acts, the docket now includes mobilization issues, challenges to decisions by the TCC and the Special Purpose Commission, disputes regarding deferrals, military service, sanctions, and new administrative restrictions.

12:03 Mon 22.06.26 125
Lidiya Izovitova identified 7 challenges in administrative proceedings for advocates

Court practice

Lidiya Izovitova identified 7 challenges in administrative proceedings for advocates

The predictability of judicial practice, jurisdictional disputes, cassation filters, enforcement of judgments against the state, the burden of proof, written proceedings, and guarantees for the practice of law remain key issues in administrative justice for advocates.

18:22 Fri 19.06.26 247

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл