National Police conducted searches of advocates without permission from investigating judge

A search of an advocate's home is not just an investigative measure, but a potential interference with attorney-client privilege, which is protected by law and international standards. It is all the more alarming when such actions are carried out without a court order, at night, and without clear justification of urgency. This new case once again raises the question: are exceptions becoming the rule and guarantees becoming a formality?
On May 29, the UNBA Committee for the Protection of Lawyers' Rights and Guarantees of the Legal Profession received another notification (this time from the Chief Investigator of the National Police) about the need to involve representatives of the bar in four investigative actions at the places of residence and professional activity of lawyers. Representatives of the UNBA Committee, Oleksandr Levadnyi, Oleksii Kalinichenko, Artem Parshin, Artur Voloshin, and Pavlo Savchenko, went to the addresses where the searches were conducted.
In the search reports, they recorded numerous violations of guarantees of the legal profession, including the lack of proper justification for the urgency of the investigative actions (one of them was even conducted at night), as well as the inspection by law enforcement officers of lawyers' files containing attorney-client privilege, which is expressly prohibited by law.
We would like to remind you that, according to the general rule of Part 2 of Article 234 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a search is conducted on the basis of a ruling by an investigating judge. And in accordance with Article 23 of the Law «On the Bar and the Practice of Law», investigative actions against an advocate, which may be carried out only with the permission of a court, are carried out on the basis of a court decision adopted at the request of the Prosecutor General, his deputies, the prosecutor of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, the region, the city of Kyiv, or the city of Sevastopol. At the same time, in the event of a search of the lawyer's home, the investigating judge must indicate in his decision a list of items and documents that are planned to be found, identified or seized during the investigative action, and also take into account the guarantees of protection of lawyer-client privilege.
Thus, in order to conduct a search of a lawyer's home, two conditions must be met:
- a ruling by an investigating judge authorizing the search;
- a special entity submitting a request for a search.
Part 3 of Article 30 of the Constitution and Part 3 of Article 233 of the CPC allow an investigator to enter the home or other property of a person before a ruling by an investigating judge only in urgent cases related to saving lives and property or the immediate pursuit of persons suspected of committing a criminal offense. In such a case, the prosecutor is obliged to apply to the investigating judge for a search warrant immediately after taking such action.
The Supreme Court emphasized that the urgent circumstances referred to by the authorities in deciding to conduct a search without a court order must be confirmed by the case file and specific circumstances. They must also generally justify the urgency on the part of law enforcement agencies (decision of the Joint Chamber of the Supreme Court of 7 October 2024 in case No. 466/525/22).
The European Court of Human Rights, analyzing cases of searches of lawyers and seizure of correspondence, emphasized that such actions constitute a serious interference with the rights guaranteed by Article 8 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and must therefore be based on particularly precise law. It is essential that there are clear and detailed rules on this matter, establishing safeguards against possible abuse or arbitrariness. And since the persecution and harassment of members of the legal profession is a threat to the very heart of the Convention system, searches of lawyers' premises must be subject to particularly strict control (para. 43 of the judgment in the case of Heino v. Finland). Failure to observe procedural guarantees during a search and seizure of items in a lawyer's home or other premises constitutes a violation of Article 8 of the Convention (paras. 66-68 of the judgment in the case of Wiser and Bikos Betailigungen GmbH v. Austria).
Popular news

Advocacy
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure
The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

Advocacy
Does the mobilization of a lawyer violate the human right to defense - conclusion of the Supreme Court
Article 335 of the CPC provides for the suspension of court proceedings only in cases where the accused was called up for military service during mobilization. However, this provision does not apply to the mobilization of a defense counsel.

Advocacy
Shoulder straps do not fit the robe: Lidiya Izovitova analyzes models of military courts restoration
The Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy held a working meeting to discuss draft laws that provide for the establishment and operation of military courts in Ukraine on a permanent basis. The Institute of Advocacy presented its reservations regarding this initiative.

Advocacy
UNBA Committee for the protection of advocates' rights responds to accusations regarding the case of «hacker lawyers»
Dzerkalo Tyzhnia's publications about «hacker lawyers» contain false information, distortions and manipulations that undermine the authority of the Bar. They are a form of unlawful pressure on the UNBA and may be an element of a paid-for campaign.

Advocacy
Problems of implementation of the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer discussed in the Verkhovna Rada
On April 16, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy held a joint working meeting to discuss the feasibility of implementing the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer and introducing the necessary amendments to the current legislation.

Advocacy
The BCU creates a working group to monitor violations of the rights of lawyers and will consider appealing to the Verkhovna…
During an extraordinary meeting on April 16, 2025, the Bar Council of Ukraine decided to establish a working group to monitor and summarize the facts of violations of the rights of lawyers and guarantees of the practice of law over the past three years, including the situation with the detention of lawyer Olga Panchenko.

Advocacy
Judicial independence: a priority that has not yet become a reality
Protecting judges from interference is a priority, but its effectiveness in practice raises questions. The High Council of Justice discussed ensuring judicial independence and the authority of justice.

Advocacy
Temporary protection, work, study: what Ukrainians should know about France and UK
What is the procedure for obtaining temporary protection status in France and the UK? When can it be refused and is it possible to appeal such a decision? What are the options for legalization and change of status? What about employment, education and business opportunities?
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…