UNBA demands from Mykola Onischuk to refute biased evaluations of the Bar’s role in reforming the profile legislation
UNBA appealed with the demand to refute public comments on the advocacy made by Mykola Onischuk, who is now heading the Working Group on issues of developing legislation and organization of judicial power within the Commission on issues of legal reform.
The reason for that was the broadcast on October 9th 2019 on “Pravo TV” channel “President will remake the law on the bar: what will change for the advocates’ self-government”. In this video Onischuk has told about the need to make changes to the new version of the law of Ukraine “On the Bar and Practice of Law".
With that, he has said biased and harmful critiques on the current situation in advocacy, which are not true and cannot be acceptable for the politician, who is authorized to develop legislative initiatives for the President
«Dogmaticity of provided evaluations on advocacy surprises, because he is not an advocate and has never had an experience of working in the advocacy. Your comments on the reason, why the draft law №9055 wasn’t passed, show not only You not understanding principles of advocacy’s organization as a municipal institute and its constitutional role, but also not knowing countless threats on the advocacy’s independence in this», - says in the UNBA’s letter. It was also mentioned, that Mr.Onischuk was present during created by Presidential Decree of P.Poroschenko on issues of judicial reform, when its coordinator A.Filatov tried to silence the protests of the advocacy and push the draft law №9055 at any price.
«In such a context it wasn’t expectable Your statement about “the existence of corporative arguments’, which as were preventing the draft law №9055 to be passed. It is obvious, that such a position was formed by the experience of working as a member of Constitutional Commission at the Presidential Office of Petro Poroshenko and Your participation in the Council on issues of judicial reform. Which was coordinated by the head deputy of the administration of President Petro Poroshenko A.Filatov, who secretly developed and accepted scandalous draft law №9055. However, your comments make absurd and threatening thesis, that the UNBA was making obstacles on the way to increase the level of advocates’ protection and their status overall », - says in the letter.
UNBA interpreted such comments as a threat to the reputation of advocacy and as an attempt to intervene into the single professional organization of advocacy by the politician
«Despite that, for the member of the Commission of issues of legal reform at the Presidential Office is not acceptable to lobby failed and harmful draft law, developed by legal team of the former government and interesting only certain group of people», - says in the letter.
UNBA payed attention, that the Main Principles of the UN on the role of lawyers, resolutions of PACE concerning Ukraine, conclusions of Venice Commission about current legislation on advocacy and interventional letters to the leaders of the Ukrainian state from the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) clearly recognize the obligation of the government to involve Bar association to the consultations during the development of national profile law. The attempt to ignore this international standard was one of the most serious reasons why the draft law №9055 failed.
«UNBA demands from you to apologize in public before all the advocates of Ukraine and refute all said during the broadcast of the “Pravo TV’ channel about existence of any “corporative arguments” in the advocacy. Now the comments provided by you are aimed at making conflicts within the advocates’ community and formation of the negative perception of UNBA by the people, we count as lobbyist to certain legislative initiatives and pushing forward the interests of certain people, who were developing the reform at the regime of the former government», - says in the letter to Commission’s on issues of the legal reform member.
Popular news
Advocacy
FLA needs urgent help, - Valentyn Gvozdiy
Twelve years of existence of the free legal aid system in Ukraine is enough to understand the inability of the Ministry of Justice to effectively manage this area.
Advocacy
The Ombudsman is concerned about the state of the FLA system
The Secretariat of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights is ready to join the development of proposals for amendments to the legal acts developed by the Ukrainian National Bar Association that will improve the functioning of the free legal aid system.
Advocacy
Ombudsman to provide legal aid with support of UNBA - pilot project
The Office of the Ukrainian Parliament Commissioner for Human Rights has launched a pilot project to provide professional legal aid to citizens in five regions of Ukraine.
Advocacy
Another model should be introduced for the FLA system, - Lidiya Izovitova
Monitoring of the current state of functioning of the legal aid system shows the existence of significant and conceptual problems in the implementation of this assistance in Ukraine.
Advocacy
Violation of media guarantees of advocacy is being studied by the UNBA
An open appeal of the Ukrainian National Bar Association's Committee on Information Policy and Interaction with the Mass Media to the advocates.
Advocacy
Lawyers are offered to be booked - amendments to draft law No. 10449
In their amendments to the draft law on strengthening mobilization, MPs propose to provide for the booking of lawyers. The goal is to prevent disruptions of court hearings.
Advocacy
E-Court failures violate constitutional guarantees – UNBA
In recent days, the Ukrainian National Bar Association has received numerous reports from lawyers about technical failures in the operation of the Electronic Court subsystem. In particular, the complaints relate to the inability to log in to the electronic office, which restricts advocates in exercising their procedural rights, in particular, to submit documents and participate in court hearings in the videoconference mode.
Advocacy
Fixed fee: time of work is important for reimbursement of attorney's fees – SC
The procedure for calculating the hourly fee differs from the fixed fee, which does not take into account the actual time spent. However, in both cases, they are taken into account when deciding on the reimbursement of legal aid expenses.
Publications
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences
Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…