UNBA demands from Mykola Onischuk to refute biased evaluations of the Bar’s role in reforming the profile legislation

UNBA appealed with the demand to refute public comments on the advocacy made by Mykola Onischuk, who is now heading the Working Group on issues of developing legislation and organization of judicial power within the Commission on issues of legal reform.
The reason for that was the broadcast on October 9th 2019 on “Pravo TV” channel “President will remake the law on the bar: what will change for the advocates’ self-government”. In this video Onischuk has told about the need to make changes to the new version of the law of Ukraine “On the Bar and Practice of Law".
With that, he has said biased and harmful critiques on the current situation in advocacy, which are not true and cannot be acceptable for the politician, who is authorized to develop legislative initiatives for the President
«Dogmaticity of provided evaluations on advocacy surprises, because he is not an advocate and has never had an experience of working in the advocacy. Your comments on the reason, why the draft law №9055 wasn’t passed, show not only You not understanding principles of advocacy’s organization as a municipal institute and its constitutional role, but also not knowing countless threats on the advocacy’s independence in this», - says in the UNBA’s letter. It was also mentioned, that Mr.Onischuk was present during created by Presidential Decree of P.Poroschenko on issues of judicial reform, when its coordinator A.Filatov tried to silence the protests of the advocacy and push the draft law №9055 at any price.
«In such a context it wasn’t expectable Your statement about “the existence of corporative arguments’, which as were preventing the draft law №9055 to be passed. It is obvious, that such a position was formed by the experience of working as a member of Constitutional Commission at the Presidential Office of Petro Poroshenko and Your participation in the Council on issues of judicial reform. Which was coordinated by the head deputy of the administration of President Petro Poroshenko A.Filatov, who secretly developed and accepted scandalous draft law №9055. However, your comments make absurd and threatening thesis, that the UNBA was making obstacles on the way to increase the level of advocates’ protection and their status overall », - says in the letter.
UNBA interpreted such comments as a threat to the reputation of advocacy and as an attempt to intervene into the single professional organization of advocacy by the politician
«Despite that, for the member of the Commission of issues of legal reform at the Presidential Office is not acceptable to lobby failed and harmful draft law, developed by legal team of the former government and interesting only certain group of people», - says in the letter.
UNBA payed attention, that the Main Principles of the UN on the role of lawyers, resolutions of PACE concerning Ukraine, conclusions of Venice Commission about current legislation on advocacy and interventional letters to the leaders of the Ukrainian state from the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) clearly recognize the obligation of the government to involve Bar association to the consultations during the development of national profile law. The attempt to ignore this international standard was one of the most serious reasons why the draft law №9055 failed.
«UNBA demands from you to apologize in public before all the advocates of Ukraine and refute all said during the broadcast of the “Pravo TV’ channel about existence of any “corporative arguments” in the advocacy. Now the comments provided by you are aimed at making conflicts within the advocates’ community and formation of the negative perception of UNBA by the people, we count as lobbyist to certain legislative initiatives and pushing forward the interests of certain people, who were developing the reform at the regime of the former government», - says in the letter to Commission’s on issues of the legal reform member.
Popular news
Advocacy

New course by the European Council HELP Program «Prohibition of improper behavior» was launched in Ukraine
Advocacy

BCU has strengthened the internship requirements
Advocacy

The person suspected in beating up advocate Nesvitailo has been placed under house arrest
Advocacy

The Sixth Administrative Court of Appeal recognized illegal the issuing of extracts from the SRAU by an unauthorized Bar…
Advocacy

BCU addressed the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the National Police, the Prosecutor General's Office and the State Bureau of…
Regional self-government

BCU canceled the decision of the Bar Council of Kyiv region on strike of advocates
Advocacy

Bar Council of Chernihiv Region presented the reform of the continuing professional development
Advocacy

As part of the reform of the professional development, Expert Council on Accreditation and Certification held a training
Publications

Valentyn Gvozdii Abolishment of the exclusive right of advocates on representation in courts will be a backdown from the established in t…

Закон і Бізнес Professional development of advocates in one click

Eugen Solodko Pros and cons of advocates' monopoly

Nataliia Mamchenko Abolishing the advocates' monopoly is about conceding human rights: advocates comment on Presidential draft law

Igor Orlov New rules for professional development will change the approach to improving the professional level of advocates

Ihor Orlov New procedure for continuous professional development: key changes

Eugen Solodko New plan on reforming the Bar - is the worst version of the "failed" draft law No. 9055

Petro Ryabenko "The existence of two bar councils in the capital is a toxic myth", - Head of the Bar Council of Kyiv Petro Ryabenko.