Legislation on advocacy needs stability - Lydia Izovitova
Head of UNBA and BCU, Lydia Izovitova took part in the 10th-anniversary international scientific-practical conference "Advocacy: past, present, and future". The event is organized by the National University "Odessa Law Academy".
In her welcoming speech, the UNBA Chairman reminded how the legislation on the bar was formed during the modern history of Ukraine. The Law on Advocacy of December 19, 1992, was adopted, which for the first time in Ukraine defined and began to regulate the status of the attorney. This law deprived authorities, in particular the Ministry of Justice, of the function to monitor and control the bar, thus it became truly independent. Then the Bar initiated the adoption of the Law "On the Bar and Legal Practice" in 2012.
"Thanks to the Bar Association, we received the Law “On the Bar and Legal Practice "dated July 5, 2012. We always take the position that this is a European legal act. He puts the Ukrainian bar on a par with the bars of democratic States of Europe in terms of its status and the scope of professional guarantees,” - Lydia Izovitova stressed.
However, since 2016 the attempts have been made to radically change this law, or rather to make it worse. These attempts were made during the next stage of judicial reform, which was expected to reform the institutions related to the judiciary.
"There was an attempt to involve advocacy in the process of unsystematic politicized unprofessional changes to the law. The reform of the bar in the state, which has the newest Law on the Bar in Europe developed on the basis of the recommendations of the Venice Commission and the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, looked strange," the UNBA President said.
However, this process had two unacceptable parameters: deviation from the already implemented European standards and the exclusion of attorneys from the process of preparing the reform of relevant legislation.
"Unfortunately, the professional judicial community has not been able to defend its right to vote, and this is one of the obvious reasons for the failure of judicial reform. However, attorneys defended the right to participate in the development of changes and blocked unacceptable restrictions on professional rights," -Lydia Izovitova said.
Nowadays, the legislation on the bar needs stability, although there are attempts to change it. "Chaotic attempts to change the status of the bar are made not through the changes of our profile law. We are witnessing the adoption of certain legislative acts that try to bring attorneys under the control. This is an attempt of the Ministry of Justice to introduce the so-called peer review in the system of free legal aid, which constitutes an interference in the activities and legal position of an attorney, and violates the principle of legal secrecy. This includes financial monitoring, the introduction of the status of whistleblowers at the legal level, and the preparation of the draft on public electronic registers that threatens the status of the Bar Council of Ukraine,” - the UNBA Chairman commented, noting that legal secrecy was attacked by non-professional legislative initiatives.
The work of attorneys has become extremely difficult due to objective obstacles to access to justice and the violation of the principles of equality and adversarial proceedings. This is especially noted by the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court. Attorneys are under public pressure, the main tool of which is the identification of attorneys and clients. Additional problems arose during the COVID-19 pandemic when judges openly used quarantine restrictions to discriminate the defense.
"If the European institution - the Venice Commission - insists on the stability of the legislation on the judiciary, this approach should be applied to the legislation on the bar. The current law made it possible to create an effective system of bar self-government bodies, guaranteed the independent activity of lawyers, and a large number of professional rights. Further changes to the legislation should provide answers to the real problems of the bar, not artificial assessments," the UNBA Chairman emphasized.
Such problems are the proper protection of lawyers' rights and the inevitability of liability for their violations. "Sooner or later we will have to improve our profile law and we have been working for a long time to improve its quality. I hope that its quality and content will depend only on our will, professionalism, and ability to offer working solutions," Lydia Izovitova said.
The topics of the conference included various aspects of the legal profession - from legal education, practical advocacy to the case-law of the European Court and the history of the legal profession in Ukraine. The event was held on the eve of the 8th anniversary of UNBA, which will be celebrated on November 17.
Popular news
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Discussion
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails
The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».
Rule of Law Roadmap
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform
On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ukraine has signed the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer
Today, on 9 March, Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi signed the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. This makes our country the 28th to sign this important international treaty.
Discussion
Detention as a rule: the UNBA discussed standards for proving risks
The state interferes most intensively with the human right to liberty when choosing a preventive measure. At this stage, the standard of proof of risk becomes the actual measure of the real meaning of the presumption of innocence.
European integration
«Freedom or security» — a false formula: speech by L. Izovitova at the conference of bar presidents
Is the state protecting society from crime today, or is it gradually destroying the rule of law under the guise of this fight? These alarming trends were outlined by the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova, during her speech at the 54th European Conference of bar presidents.
Discussion
AI in advocacy and justice: ethics, regulation, limits of application
The Ukrainian National Bar Association held a roundtable discussion entitled «Artificial Intelligence in the цork of advocates: ethics, responsibility, legal process engineering». Participants discussed how artificial intelligence systems are already being used in the professional activities of advocates and where the ethical boundaries of what is permissible lie.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates