In 2020 violations of the rights of attorneys by judges of the High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine were recorded in 40 appeals of the UNBA to the authorities and international institutions
Home news quote
For almost 2 years of the existence of the High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine (hereinafter – HACC), Bar Council of Ukraine has addressed more than 40 appeals to the authorities and international legal institutions on the activities of the judges of this court.
It was emphasized by UNBA\BCU President Lydia Izovitova, on the International scientific-practical conference "Anti-corruption bodies: problems of formation, development, and interaction", which took place on April 9, 2021, at the National University "Odesa Law Academy".
"During 2020, the BCU has repeatedly considered attorneys` complaints about violations of their rights and guarantees of advocacy by judges of the HACC. Based on these complaints, the BCU has made 6 decisions, which have pointed to the inadmissibility of such violations. Also, the detailed legal substantiation of each case of such violations and recommendations for their immediate elimination is provided in the decisions. Some decisions were made based on appeals from 11 attorneys, some in response to violations of the rights of one attorney. More than 40 official appeals of BCU to state authorities and international professional institutions have drawn attention to this problem", - said UNBA President.
Lydia Izovitova focused on some far from legal, sometimes arbitrary, actions of judges of this court, which reflect the implementation of "a certain harmful policy in the judiciary: already pronounced, widespread and, unfortunately, perceived by some judges HACC. UNBA President has provided specific examples on this matter.
On the opinion of Lydia Izovitova, the first wake-up call is the publication on the official website of the HACC of the article of the HACC judge Viktor Maslov - "On measures to combat procedural abuse in criminal proceedings", which stated that the court itself may recognize as abusive any actions that have the appropriate direction and prevent a fast, full and impartial trial. Assessing this message, BCU stated that the author of the publication creates a basis for the criminalization of tools and tactics of protection, violating the constitutionally guaranteed right to protection. As a result, BCU accepted the appeal to the High Council of Justice, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, and the HACC.
"We see now that the court itself, as a sign of orientation, recognizes as abusive any lawful actions that prevent, in their opinion, a fast, complete, and impartial trial, and such a policy has already reached a fairly high degree of arbitrariness. In particular, the provisions of Articles 59, 63, and 64 of the Constitution of Ukraine on the right of a person to protection and professional legal assistance, which cannot be limited, became an obstacle to fast, full and impartial court proceedings for some HACC judges”, - Lidia Izovitova said.
UNBA is also concerned about the gross disregard of procedural law by HACC judges, in particular, the unfounded refusal to grant defense counsel's requests for a reasonable time to review the case file. For example, attorney Avdeenko V.A. addressed the UNBA with such a statement. Since he was given only 24 hours to read the audio and video recordings on 9 discs, he was forced to resign as a defense attorney with the consent of the client. However, the panel of judges of the HACC obliged the attorney to continue to participate in the proceedings, arguing that the defense counsel did not cite any of the circumstances provided for in Article 78 of the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine.
"Restrictions imposed by the panel of judges of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court on reasonable deadlines for reviewing case materials, pressure from judges on an attorney for his mandatory but formal participation in the process, deprivation of the right to use procedural tools guaranteed to an attorney - made it impossible for attorney Avdeenko V.A. in adversarial proceedings, which is a violation of the basic principles of criminal proceedings and the actual deprivation of the accused of proper defense and free choice of attorney, contrary to the Constitution of Ukraine, the relevant law, the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine", - said Lydia Izovitova.
UNBA considers the statement of the HACC panel of judges in one criminal case, in which it was reported about the possibility of changing the measure of restraint for the accused due to the position of defense attorneys in the case, which, in the opinion of the panel, "prevents" the court from considering criminal proceedings. With such a threat from HACC judges, attorneys were effectively deprived of the opportunity to defend themselves professionally, the defendants were forced to renounce their defense counsel. Instead, the court forcibly, despite the objections of the accused, appointed a defense counsel following the Law of Ukraine “On Free Legal Aid”.
"Ignoring all the guarantees and principles of advocacy in Ukraine provided by national and international law, HACC judges, to speed up the trial, have put pressure on attorneys, replaced attorneys chosen by the client with attorneys from the free legal aid system, which, of course, contradicts the general principles of criminal procedure law and is incompatible with the state-guaranteed guarantees of independence and impartiality of judges", - said the Head of the UNBA.
Lydia Izovitova believes that there is a great danger in such manifestations, which is to limit the possibility of exercising the constitutional human right to protection, and defenders - to perform their professional duties. "There are problems, and they are not legislative. These are problems of legal consciousness of judges, and it is necessary to work with it every day ", - Lydia Izovitova emphasized.
UNBA will send to the High Council of Justice the results of the audit of judicial reform - Lydia Izovitova
UNBA appeals to SJA and Prosecutor General regarding inadmissibility of restrictions on access to court decisions
Legislation on advocacy needs stability - Lydia Izovitova
Initiatives of new judicial reform cannot be a response to previous failed changes in the judiciary - Maryna Stavniychuk
The Minister of Justice does not have the authority to evaluate the Constitutional Court`s decisions - Maryna Stavniychuk
The ICJ recognized the positive bar reform of 2012, which ensured its independence
ICJ report: Lawyers in Ukraine continue to be regularly targeted through the justice system for undue reasons