In 2020 violations of the rights of attorneys by judges of the High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine were recorded in 40 appeals of the UNBA to the authorities and international institutions
For almost 2 years of the existence of the High Anti-Corruption Court of Ukraine (hereinafter – HACC), Bar Council of Ukraine has addressed more than 40 appeals to the authorities and international legal institutions on the activities of the judges of this court.
It was emphasized by UNBA\BCU President Lydia Izovitova, on the International scientific-practical conference "Anti-corruption bodies: problems of formation, development, and interaction", which took place on April 9, 2021, at the National University "Odesa Law Academy".
"During 2020, the BCU has repeatedly considered attorneys` complaints about violations of their rights and guarantees of advocacy by judges of the HACC. Based on these complaints, the BCU has made 6 decisions, which have pointed to the inadmissibility of such violations. Also, the detailed legal substantiation of each case of such violations and recommendations for their immediate elimination is provided in the decisions. Some decisions were made based on appeals from 11 attorneys, some in response to violations of the rights of one attorney. More than 40 official appeals of BCU to state authorities and international professional institutions have drawn attention to this problem", - said UNBA President.
Lydia Izovitova focused on some far from legal, sometimes arbitrary, actions of judges of this court, which reflect the implementation of "a certain harmful policy in the judiciary: already pronounced, widespread and, unfortunately, perceived by some judges HACC. UNBA President has provided specific examples on this matter.
On the opinion of Lydia Izovitova, the first wake-up call is the publication on the official website of the HACC of the article of the HACC judge Viktor Maslov - "On measures to combat procedural abuse in criminal proceedings", which stated that the court itself may recognize as abusive any actions that have the appropriate direction and prevent a fast, full and impartial trial. Assessing this message, BCU stated that the author of the publication creates a basis for the criminalization of tools and tactics of protection, violating the constitutionally guaranteed right to protection. As a result, BCU accepted the appeal to the High Council of Justice, the Council of Judges of Ukraine, and the HACC.
"We see now that the court itself, as a sign of orientation, recognizes as abusive any lawful actions that prevent, in their opinion, a fast, complete, and impartial trial, and such a policy has already reached a fairly high degree of arbitrariness. In particular, the provisions of Articles 59, 63, and 64 of the Constitution of Ukraine on the right of a person to protection and professional legal assistance, which cannot be limited, became an obstacle to fast, full and impartial court proceedings for some HACC judges”, - Lidia Izovitova said.
UNBA is also concerned about the gross disregard of procedural law by HACC judges, in particular, the unfounded refusal to grant defense counsel's requests for a reasonable time to review the case file. For example, attorney Avdeenko V.A. addressed the UNBA with such a statement. Since he was given only 24 hours to read the audio and video recordings on 9 discs, he was forced to resign as a defense attorney with the consent of the client. However, the panel of judges of the HACC obliged the attorney to continue to participate in the proceedings, arguing that the defense counsel did not cite any of the circumstances provided for in Article 78 of the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine.
"Restrictions imposed by the panel of judges of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court on reasonable deadlines for reviewing case materials, pressure from judges on an attorney for his mandatory but formal participation in the process, deprivation of the right to use procedural tools guaranteed to an attorney - made it impossible for attorney Avdeenko V.A. in adversarial proceedings, which is a violation of the basic principles of criminal proceedings and the actual deprivation of the accused of proper defense and free choice of attorney, contrary to the Constitution of Ukraine, the relevant law, the Criminal Procedural Code of Ukraine", - said Lydia Izovitova.
UNBA considers the statement of the HACC panel of judges in one criminal case, in which it was reported about the possibility of changing the measure of restraint for the accused due to the position of defense attorneys in the case, which, in the opinion of the panel, "prevents" the court from considering criminal proceedings. With such a threat from HACC judges, attorneys were effectively deprived of the opportunity to defend themselves professionally, the defendants were forced to renounce their defense counsel. Instead, the court forcibly, despite the objections of the accused, appointed a defense counsel following the Law of Ukraine “On Free Legal Aid”.
"Ignoring all the guarantees and principles of advocacy in Ukraine provided by national and international law, HACC judges, to speed up the trial, have put pressure on attorneys, replaced attorneys chosen by the client with attorneys from the free legal aid system, which, of course, contradicts the general principles of criminal procedure law and is incompatible with the state-guaranteed guarantees of independence and impartiality of judges", - said the Head of the UNBA.
Lydia Izovitova believes that there is a great danger in such manifestations, which is to limit the possibility of exercising the constitutional human right to protection, and defenders - to perform their professional duties. "There are problems, and they are not legislative. These are problems of legal consciousness of judges, and it is necessary to work with it every day ", - Lydia Izovitova emphasized.
Popular news

Advocacy
Another conflict with the TCC: an advocate's leg was broken and his client jumped out of a window
On June 19, at the premises of the military medical commission, where a bus from the Krasnograd Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support delivered several people, an incident occurred involving the use of physical force against an advocate.

Advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of t…
On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

Advocacy
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession
The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

Advocacy
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure
The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

Advocacy
BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine will appeal to the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, Vasyl Malyuk, regarding the verification of information about «negative trends in the legal profession» disseminated by some media outlets on behalf of the SSU.

Advocacy
Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature
Thirteen member states of the Council of Europe have signed the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate, which was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on March 12, 2025. Four more countries will do so today. Ukraine is not among them.

Advocacy
BCU initiates resolution of the issue of visits by advocates to convicted persons
Article 110 of the Criminal Enforcement Code guarantees convicted persons confidentiality of meetings with their advocate. One of the important elements is the possibility to communicate with an advocate in a room without a solid partition. In practice, this provision of the law is systematically violated.

Advocacy
Advocates, academics, and experts examine problems in forensic examination (video)
The Ukrainian National Bar Association, in cooperation with leading scientific and research institutes of forensic expertise, organized a round table on expert support for legal practice.
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…