UNBA proposes legal reform commission to strengthen guarantees of legal practice
President of UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova sent to the Chair of the Commission on Legal Reform under the President of Ukraine Serhiy Ionushas draft proposals for amendments to the law "On the Bar and Practice of Law".
The document was prepared by UNBA with the aim of practical implementation of the goals of the Strategy for the Development of the Justice System and Constitutional Justice for 2021-2023.
The proposals relate to the relevant law in terms of strengthening professional rights and guarantees of legal practice, as well as strengthening the status of bar self-government.
In particular, it is proposed to give advocates the right of unhindered access to the premises of state authorities and local self-government, courts, prosecutor's offices, law enforcement agencies, penitentiary institutions, and other office premises in connection with his legal practice on the basis of an advocate's ID, except in cases provided for by law.
UNBA proposes in the law to provide advocates with identified access to state registers, including the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations, the Unified State Register of Enforcement Proceedings, to the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System in the manner described by the relevant holder of the register or automated system in agreement with the Bar Council of Ukraine, except for registers containing information that is a state secret in the absence of appropriate access to state secrets; unhindered access to the court premises during working hours and during the court hearing in the case in which the client of the advocate participates, as well as to the premises of the courts, prosecutor's offices, police, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, other law enforcement agencies, institutions for pre-trial detention and execution of punishments, public authorities at any time, if in these there is a client on these premises.
Article 20 of the relevant law proposes to add that an advocate without special permission may privately (in conditions that ensure confidentiality) meet with his client, including in case of his detention, arrest and detention and serving a sentence in the form of imprisonment, without limitation in the number of visits and the duration of each of them, regardless of client's location.
Article 23 proposes to clarify the current prohibition norm, setting it out as following: "it is forbidden to interrogate, demand or request from an advocate, his assistant, trainee, a person who is in labor relations with an advocate, law office, bar association, as well as from a person against whom the right to practice law has been terminated or suspended, or to try to another way to obtain without the consent of the advocate and/or his client privileged information, data, statements, documents, materials, including those obtained by an advocate in connection with or used for legal practice."
In the same article it is proposed to clarify and amend the current paragraph that any measures to ensure criminal proceedings, operative-search and investigative (search) actions, including covert, against an advocate, application of restraining measure, detention or any restriction of the freedom of movement of an advocate can be carried out only on the basis of the decision of the investigating judge of the court of appeal upon request of the Prosecutor General, his Deputy, the Prosecutor of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, the region, the City of Kyiv and the City of Sevastopol and exclusively in connection with suspicion of advocate in commission of criminal offenses.
It is proposed to clarify the prohibition of entering the dwelling or other premises owned by advocate, the premises in which the advocate's workplace is located, conducting an inspection, search or other investigative actions therein, as well as conducting a personal search of an advocate, reviewing, retrieving or seizing items and documents of an advocate, "except when such actions are carried out within the framework of criminal proceedings in which the advocate is suspected of committing a crime."
The relevant law is proposed to be supplemented with a ban on the collection of information in any form and in any way regarding communication, correspondence, other communications (including using means of communication) of an advocate, assistant advocate with a client, an advocate with an assistant, a trainee, as well as ban interference with such communications; records of such communication should be immediately destroyed, and any make use thereof illegal.
The current guarantees of legal practice are also proposed to be supplemented with the wording "Evidence obtained during a search or inspection of housing, other possession of an advocate, premises where he carries out legal practice, as well as evidence obtained by way of temporary access to the advocate's belongings and documents, in the absence of a representative of the regional Bar Council, are inadmissible."
It should be noted that during 2021, the UNBA systematically interacted with the Commission on Legal Reform, in particular, sent to the Commission an Action Plan for Institutional Improvement of the Bar, which elaborates on the President’s Strategy.
Photos from the UNBA archive
Popular news
Legal defence of military personnel
The model for legal assistance to veterans was discussed at the UNBA
A working meeting was held at the Ukrainian National Bar Association, during which representatives of the advocacy profession, the Ministry of Veterans Affairs of Ukraine and a foreign expert discussed approaches to providing legal aid to veterans, the role of the advocacy profession in this system, and the experience of other countries.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The CJU has endorsed guarantees of the legal profession’s independence and has proposed a meeting with the BCU
The Council of Judges of Ukraine has responded to a letter from the Bar Council of Ukraine regarding the inadmissibility of the High Council of Justice granting immunity to a member of the High Council of Justice — a privilege not provided for by law — as well as regarding violations of constitutional guarantees of the independence of the legal profession and attorney-client privilege.
Interaction
The UNBA and the Ministry of Veterans are expanding their cooperation
War veterans, their family members, as well as the family members of fallen Defenders of Ukraine are to receive improved access to professional legal assistance and additional opportunities for independent legal protection.
Legislation
Advocates have warned that the draft Labor Code would curtail workers' protections
Certain provisions of the draft Labor Code of Ukraine regarding collective labor disputes undermine labor protections and do not comply with constitutional and international standards.
Legal defence of military personnel
Representatives from the Ministry of Veterans Affairs and the UNBA discussed veterans' access to justice
On April 3, a working meeting was held at the Ministry of Veterans Affairs of Ukraine with representatives of the Ukrainian National Bar Association, dedicated to improving the effectiveness of legal protection for war veterans and their families.
Educational events
The right of minors to marry: how judicial oversight works
The issue of granting minors the right to marry lies at the intersection of family law, child protection, and judicial discretion. The UNBA Committee on family law dedicated a webinar held on March 30 to this very topic.
Interaction
The UNBA and the Coordination headquarters have agreed to cooperate in assisting those released from captivity
Servicemen released from captivity, family members of prisoners of war, civilians deprived of their personal liberty as a result of armed aggression, as well as persons missing in connection with the war, will gain additional opportunities to access legal assistance and protect their rights.
Self-government
BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession
The Bar Council of Ukraine has concluded that, in its recent decisions, the High Council of Justice has, without legal grounds, called into question the right of bar self-governing bodies to protect the guarantees of legal practice and has, in effect, attempted to grant one of its members — who retains the status of an advocate — special immunity from the Rules of professional conduct and disciplinary responsibility.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates