UNBA proposes legal reform commission to strengthen guarantees of legal practice
President of UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova sent to the Chair of the Commission on Legal Reform under the President of Ukraine Serhiy Ionushas draft proposals for amendments to the law "On the Bar and Practice of Law".
The document was prepared by UNBA with the aim of practical implementation of the goals of the Strategy for the Development of the Justice System and Constitutional Justice for 2021-2023.
The proposals relate to the relevant law in terms of strengthening professional rights and guarantees of legal practice, as well as strengthening the status of bar self-government.
In particular, it is proposed to give advocates the right of unhindered access to the premises of state authorities and local self-government, courts, prosecutor's offices, law enforcement agencies, penitentiary institutions, and other office premises in connection with his legal practice on the basis of an advocate's ID, except in cases provided for by law.
UNBA proposes in the law to provide advocates with identified access to state registers, including the Unified Register of Pre-Trial Investigations, the Unified State Register of Enforcement Proceedings, to the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System in the manner described by the relevant holder of the register or automated system in agreement with the Bar Council of Ukraine, except for registers containing information that is a state secret in the absence of appropriate access to state secrets; unhindered access to the court premises during working hours and during the court hearing in the case in which the client of the advocate participates, as well as to the premises of the courts, prosecutor's offices, police, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, other law enforcement agencies, institutions for pre-trial detention and execution of punishments, public authorities at any time, if in these there is a client on these premises.
Article 20 of the relevant law proposes to add that an advocate without special permission may privately (in conditions that ensure confidentiality) meet with his client, including in case of his detention, arrest and detention and serving a sentence in the form of imprisonment, without limitation in the number of visits and the duration of each of them, regardless of client's location.
Article 23 proposes to clarify the current prohibition norm, setting it out as following: "it is forbidden to interrogate, demand or request from an advocate, his assistant, trainee, a person who is in labor relations with an advocate, law office, bar association, as well as from a person against whom the right to practice law has been terminated or suspended, or to try to another way to obtain without the consent of the advocate and/or his client privileged information, data, statements, documents, materials, including those obtained by an advocate in connection with or used for legal practice."
In the same article it is proposed to clarify and amend the current paragraph that any measures to ensure criminal proceedings, operative-search and investigative (search) actions, including covert, against an advocate, application of restraining measure, detention or any restriction of the freedom of movement of an advocate can be carried out only on the basis of the decision of the investigating judge of the court of appeal upon request of the Prosecutor General, his Deputy, the Prosecutor of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, the region, the City of Kyiv and the City of Sevastopol and exclusively in connection with suspicion of advocate in commission of criminal offenses.
It is proposed to clarify the prohibition of entering the dwelling or other premises owned by advocate, the premises in which the advocate's workplace is located, conducting an inspection, search or other investigative actions therein, as well as conducting a personal search of an advocate, reviewing, retrieving or seizing items and documents of an advocate, "except when such actions are carried out within the framework of criminal proceedings in which the advocate is suspected of committing a crime."
The relevant law is proposed to be supplemented with a ban on the collection of information in any form and in any way regarding communication, correspondence, other communications (including using means of communication) of an advocate, assistant advocate with a client, an advocate with an assistant, a trainee, as well as ban interference with such communications; records of such communication should be immediately destroyed, and any make use thereof illegal.
The current guarantees of legal practice are also proposed to be supplemented with the wording "Evidence obtained during a search or inspection of housing, other possession of an advocate, premises where he carries out legal practice, as well as evidence obtained by way of temporary access to the advocate's belongings and documents, in the absence of a representative of the regional Bar Council, are inadmissible."
It should be noted that during 2021, the UNBA systematically interacted with the Commission on Legal Reform, in particular, sent to the Commission an Action Plan for Institutional Improvement of the Bar, which elaborates on the President’s Strategy.
Photos from the UNBA archive
Popular news
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform
On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Ukraine has signed the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer
Today, on 9 March, Ukraine's Permanent Representative to the Council of Europe Mykola Tochytskyi signed the Council of Europe Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. This makes our country the 28th to sign this important international treaty.
Discussion
Detention as a rule: the UNBA discussed standards for proving risks
The state interferes most intensively with the human right to liberty when choosing a preventive measure. At this stage, the standard of proof of risk becomes the actual measure of the real meaning of the presumption of innocence.
European integration
«Freedom or security» — a false formula: speech by L. Izovitova at the conference of bar presidents
Is the state protecting society from crime today, or is it gradually destroying the rule of law under the guise of this fight? These alarming trends were outlined by the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova, during her speech at the 54th European Conference of bar presidents.
Discussion
AI in advocacy and justice: ethics, regulation, limits of application
The Ukrainian National Bar Association held a roundtable discussion entitled «Artificial Intelligence in the цork of advocates: ethics, responsibility, legal process engineering». Participants discussed how artificial intelligence systems are already being used in the professional activities of advocates and where the ethical boundaries of what is permissible lie.
European integration
Researchers from the USA explain how shadow reports became a grant service
Shadow reporting often becomes a tool for the grant economy and competition for influence on policy. Such «expertise» replaces impartial analysis with the delegitimization of bar self-government, masks conflicts of interest, and is used as a channel for external pressure on the institution.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates