The advocate’s workplace in court: is it possible to ensure normal conditions?
It is no secret that Ukrainian courts have many courtrooms that do not meet the basic needs of the parties. At times, advocates are forced to work literally on their knees and have to get used to such every-day humiliation.
This problem was raised by the Bar Council of Ukraine at the meeting ace today, August 12th, in Uzhhorod) in connection with the consideration of a lawyer's appeal on violation of his professional rights.
For instance, an advocate arrived at the court hearing, where the issue of choosing a preventive measure for the client was being decided. However, there was no place in the courtroom where he could sit down at the table and lay out his working materials in the criminal case. The motion to the presiding judge to change the room was not granted by the court. Therefore, in the advocate’s opinion, the lack of proper working conditions was an obstacle to the effective defense of the client.
«When courts do not provide conditions for advocates to sit at a table and lay out their materials in order to provide professional assistance, we can talk about signs of obstruction of the practice of law and violation of advocate’s professional guarantees», - said Ihor Kolesnikov, Secretary of the Ukrainian National Bar Association, who spoke on the issue.
The participants of the meeting shared their own experiences and confirmed that the situation can be considered normal only in Kyiv City, where the courts are more or less stocked with the necessary supplies. But in the regions, the situation with advocates' workplaces is much worse. At the same time, when choosing a courtroom for a hearing, the court knows how many defendants and how many defense lawyers will be present. Therefore, they must choose the right room, including the need to provide a workplace for all advocates into consideration.
«Providing and arranging a place for an advocate in the courtroom, although purely a technical issue, directly affects the quality of everyone's right to professional legal aid guaranteed by the Constitution of Ukraine», - said Lidiya Izovitova, President UNBA and BCU. «By taking an oath, an advocate promises to honestly and conscientiously ensure the right to defense and provide legal aid in accordance with the Constitution and laws of Ukraine, and to fulfil his or her duties with high responsibility. However, one is simply precluded from providing effective defense to a client. Also, in this regard, the technical recording of complaints and motions filed by him is not carried out at all or is carried out with poor quality, which is a violation of the provisions of the Procedure Code. That is, the issue is quite important for us», - added President of UNBA, BCU.
Lyudmyla Hryn, a member of the BCU from Chernihiv region, added that the lack of a workplace is also a humiliation and a manifestation of disrespect for the legal profession. «If a prosecutor has a proper workplace, but an advocate does not, then the principle of adversariality is violated. You can't compete in unequal conditions», - she added.
«We are increasingly tolerant of violations of rights», - said Oksana Kadenko, a member of the BCU from Khmelnytsky region. «We already accept it as the norm when the accused is not allowed to sit in court with his advocate, only with the prosecutor». In her opinion, it is necessary to formulate a position on providing advocates with the necessary working conditions on an equal footing with other parties (to enable use of equipment, documents), as well as to ensure access to confidential communication with the client directly at such a workplace.
Following the discussion, the members of the BCU decided to contact the advocates in order to summarize similar cases. Based on the results of the study, it is planned to prepare an appeal to the State Judicial Administration and the High Council of Justice to organize a comprehensive solution to the problem of inadequacy of advocate’s workplaces in the courts of Ukraine.
Popular news
Self-government
BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession
The Bar Council of Ukraine has concluded that, in its recent decisions, the High Council of Justice has, without legal grounds, called into question the right of bar self-governing bodies to protect the guarantees of legal practice and has, in effect, attempted to grant one of its members — who retains the status of an advocate — special immunity from the Rules of professional conduct and disciplinary responsibility.
Interaction
Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation
Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Discussion
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails
The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».
Rule of Law Roadmap
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change
On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.
Appointment
A representative of the UNBA has arrived in Cairo
Advocate Irena Maria Ostrozka-Sangushko has been appointed as the representative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association in the Arab Republic of Egypt, in the city of Cairo. The corresponding Order No. 80, dated March 10, 2026, was signed by the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform
On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates