In Moldova lawyers discussed the risks of the profession
Recently the International Conference of the Union of Advocates of the Republic of Moldova was held in Chisinau, during which participants from different countries discussed current issues of the Bar.
The event was attended by representatives of the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
In her speech, Lidiya Izovitova, the president of UNBA, in particular, drew attention to the fact that in Ukraine, during the martial law, the problem of violation of the rights of advocates and guarantees of the practice of law has become particularly acute: disregard for the principle of confidentiality, identification of an advocate with a client, lack of respect for the attorney-client privilege, and encroachment on life and health. In times of war, society does not always share the protective mission of lawyers, so the profession becomes risky. Nevertheless, the Bar steadfastly upholds the constitutional principle of the rule of law and hopes that society will eventually come to understand its value. In such a critical situation, the support of colleagues and international partners is of particular importance.
One of the conference sessions was devoted to the issue of risks to the legal profession. Highlighting the problem of the identification of lawyers with clients in Ukraine, member of the Bar Council of Ukraine from Rivne region Hanna Lazarchuk spoke about the peculiarities of defending persons suspected of war crimes and collaboration.
«There is an opinion in society that if you defend a traitor, you are a traitor yourself. That is why some colleagues refuse to defend clients, fearing for their lives and the lives of their loved ones», she explained. «There are frequent cases of serving summonses to lawyers right during investigative actions or court hearings, in order to eliminate a lawyer who is inconvenient for the investigation, too active. The UNBA considered more than ten appeals from colleagues on this topic. But these are only those who, despite the public pressure, were not afraid to speak out and ask for help. In fact, there are many more such cases», said Lazarchuk.
In addition to the problems of the Institute's activity, the attorneys in Chisinau also paid attention to the aspects of digitalisation of the judiciary. The UNBA representative in the Republic of Moldova, Yuriy Hryhorenko, shared with his colleagues the experience of digitalisation in the management of a professional organisation that unites all Ukrainian lawyers.
In particular, he told his colleagues about the Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine, which over the ten years of its existence has become a multifunctional service for every advocate, his business card. An online platform of the Higher School of Advocacy was created for professional development. It brings together four in-service training providers that organise more than two thousand events annually.
Yuriy Hryhorenko also announced plans to create a system for paralegals, automate the procedure for acquiring the right to practice law, introduce new IT products to improve and simplify the operational functions of the UNBA office, its committees and regional bar councils, and synchronise the Electronic Court system with the URAU. «Today, working through the E-Court is perhaps the only opportunity for lawyers who left Ukraine because of the war to stay in the profession, provide legal aid and have a livelihood», said the UNBA representative in the Republic of Moldova.
The Ukrainian delegation also expressed its gratitude for the financial assistance received by the Ukrainian Bar and for the shelter of Ukrainians in Moldova. «I would like to ask you to support Ukrainian lawyers in Moldova who have lost their jobs», said Lidiya Izovitova. – «Some of them continue to perform their professional duties online (through our e-court system). Others could practice in your territory under Ukrainian law. The relevant recommendations were prepared by the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) in September last year».
Popular news
Self-government
BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession
The Bar Council of Ukraine has concluded that, in its recent decisions, the High Council of Justice has, without legal grounds, called into question the right of bar self-governing bodies to protect the guarantees of legal practice and has, in effect, attempted to grant one of its members — who retains the status of an advocate — special immunity from the Rules of professional conduct and disciplinary responsibility.
Interaction
The UNBA and the National Guard have agreed to cooperate on legal protection for military personnel
Servicemembers of the National Guard, their family members, and veterans are to receive additional legal tools to protect their rights, while the National Guard’s legal services will receive methodological and expert support.
Interaction
Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation
Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed
The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.
Rule of Law Roadmap
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv
Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.
Discussion
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails
The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».
Rule of Law Roadmap
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change
On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.
Appointment
A representative of the UNBA has arrived in Cairo
Advocate Irena Maria Ostrozka-Sangushko has been appointed as the representative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association in the Arab Republic of Egypt, in the city of Cairo. The corresponding Order No. 80, dated March 10, 2026, was signed by the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates