Lawyers explained the importance of intellectual property protection in the defense sector

Advocacy
13:24 Mon 19.02.24 353 Reviews
Print

Today, the Armed Forces of Ukraine need to be constantly supplied not only with repaired or refurbished weapons, but also with the latest military equipment. Therefore, the issue of intellectual property is becoming critically important for both defense companies and the state.

The organization of patenting, licensing, inventing and rationalization work was recently discussed at an instructional and methodological session at the Administration of the State Special Transport Service, which operates within the system of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine.

The event was attended by Hanna Kolesnyk, Chairman of the UNBA Committee on Human Rights Protection, Igor Svetlichnyi, a member of the Committee's Council and a senior officer of the Military Science Department of the State Special Transport Service Administration, and Oleg Chernobai, Chairman of the Intellectual Property Committee of the Kyiv Regional Bar Council.

I. Svetlichny recalled the provisions of the main documents that regulate this area of activity at the departmental level:

  • Regulation on patent-licensing, inventive and rationalization work in the system of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine (Order of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine No. 287 dated 20.09.2022)
  • Methodical recommendations on the procedure for drafting, filing and reviewing an application for an innovation proposal (Order of the State Patent Office of Ukraine No. 131 of August 27, 1995).
  • The IP-5 application form, approved by Order of the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine No. 469 dated 10.08.2004.

The lawyer said that applications for rationalization proposals are reviewed by the commission for novelty and usefulness within thirty days. If necessary, the rationalization proposal is submitted for additional analysis and expert opinion. After the proposal is recognized as an innovation and accepted for use, each of the co-authors receives a certificate.

I. Svetlichny emphasized that servicemen who are the authors of the most valuable inventions created in the course of their duties, as well as of rationalization proposals, may (if they need to participate in the development and verification of proposals) be temporarily released from their duties with the permission of their superior for up to 30 days.

«Intellectual property, like any other type of property, is often subject to unlawful actions by third parties and, accordingly, requires legal protection. At the same time, special attention should be paid to the protection of rights to such intellectual property that can serve the purposes of state defense», said H. Kolesnyk.

An example of the importance of protecting intellectual property in the defense sector was given by H. Kolesnyk, referring to case No. 757/11406/20-ц.

In 2016, the Armored Plant received a certificate of registration for a night sight that was approved for use by the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Two years later, the Ministry of Economy issued a patent for a utility model related to this device. And on the basis of the patent, the owner of the right to use the model demanded that the plant stop using the object of its intellectual property in any way. This threatened to stop the repair work on the defense order for the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine.

However, the company found that the Ministry had violated the terms of legal protection, as the combination of features of the model was publicly available in the world before the date of filing the application. Therefore, in March 2020, the plant filed a lawsuit to invalidate the patent.

The courts of all instances sided with the plaintiff. The key to the case was the expert's opinion, which concluded that as of the date of filing the application for the invention under the Ukrainian patent, all the features of the utility model claims under the Ukrainian patent were known, so the utility model under the patent does not meet the condition of patentability «novelty».

At the same time, the defendant did not provide the court with any evidence that would refute the correctness and completeness of this conclusion and did not file a petition for the appointment of an examination of the intellectual property object in the case.

Also, during the event, its participants determined the prospects for the development of inventions, organization of work of invention clubs at the Department of Military Training of the State Service of Ukraine for Specialized Transport and Exploration of the peculiarities of registration of patents of Ukraine for utility models and service inventions of military personnel.

Popular news

A bill implementing the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer has been introduced

Legislation

A bill implementing the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer has been introduced

The constitutional guarantees of legal aid, defense, and the independence of advocacy cannot be realized without protecting advocates from unwarranted interference in their professional activities, including searches, the seizure of professional materials and the use of criminal procedural mechanisms to exert pressure.

14:08 Mon 05.10.26 199
The CCBE is discussing European justice and issues related to the protection of advocates

Abroad

The CCBE is discussing European justice and issues related to the protection of advocates

Today, October 2, a meeting of the Standing Committee of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) is taking place in Brussels. On the agenda are the protection of the advocate profession, the rule of law, attorney-client privilege, and changes in the European justice system.

14:04 Fri 02.10.26 148
The UNBA presented the key provisions of the future law on advocacy in Brussels

Rule of Law Roadmap

The UNBA presented the key provisions of the future law on advocacy in Brussels

The Ukrainian National Bar Association presented its proposals for the upcoming law on advocacy, aligned with the Rule of Law Roadmap. The presentation covered topics such as access to the profession, self-governance, disciplinary procedures, professional development and guarantees for the practice of advocacy.

20:36 Thu 01.10.26 197
Advocates were taught to voice their complaints without making accusations

Educational events

Advocates were taught to voice their complaints without making accusations

In a difficult conversation, it’s easy to confuse facts with opinions, feelings with accusations, and requests with demands. How can you express dissatisfaction, explain your own needs, and propose a specific solution while still allowing your conversation partner the opportunity to refuse or suggest an alternative?

10:29 Wed 30.09.26 124
The paradoxes of urgency: is it possible to investigate a crime before it is committed?

Guarantees of the practice of law

The paradoxes of urgency: is it possible to investigate a crime before it is committed?

On September 24 in Kyiv, National Police officers detained an advocate during an emergency search, having caught him in the act of committing a crime. At the time, the pretrial investigation in this case had already been ongoing for more than four months.

18:01 Mon 28.09.26 105
Unrestricted access to advocates' accounts poses a risk of client data disclosure — BCU

Guarantees of the practice of law

Unrestricted access to advocates' accounts poses a risk of client data disclosure — BCU

Information regarding transactions in the bank accounts of an advocate, a law firm, or a bar association from which clients can be identified, as well as the fact and subject matter of a request for legal assistance, the purpose of payments, and the amount of the fee constitutes attorney-client privilege. This rule applies regardless of whether the information also constitutes banking information and is in the possession of a bank.

16:47 Sat 26.09.26 117
The contract provides for a video conference, but the court requires in-person appearance: how should an advocate proceed?

Guarantees of the practice of law

The contract provides for a video conference, but the court requires in-person appearance: how should an advocate proceed?

Many advocates today work remotely; therefore, their agreements with clients provide for the provision of legal assistance via videoconferencing. However, this form of work does not, in and of itself, create an unconditional obligation for the court to conduct every hearing via videoconference.

16:25 Sat 26.09.26 120
Independent oversight is necessary before using CISA materials against an advocate – Lidiya Izovitova

Guarantees of the practice of law

Independent oversight is necessary before using CISA materials against an advocate – Lidiya Izovitova

Before the prosecution uses information obtained during covert investigative actions and related to an advocate’s activities, independent procedural oversight must be conducted. It is necessary to determine whether such information is covered by attorney-client privilege and whether it may be disclosed.

15:47 Fri 25.09.26 253

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл