Lawyers explained the importance of intellectual property protection in the defense sector
Today, the Armed Forces of Ukraine need to be constantly supplied not only with repaired or refurbished weapons, but also with the latest military equipment. Therefore, the issue of intellectual property is becoming critically important for both defense companies and the state.
The organization of patenting, licensing, inventing and rationalization work was recently discussed at an instructional and methodological session at the Administration of the State Special Transport Service, which operates within the system of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine.
The event was attended by Hanna Kolesnyk, Chairman of the UNBA Committee on Human Rights Protection, Igor Svetlichnyi, a member of the Committee's Council and a senior officer of the Military Science Department of the State Special Transport Service Administration, and Oleg Chernobai, Chairman of the Intellectual Property Committee of the Kyiv Regional Bar Council.
I. Svetlichny recalled the provisions of the main documents that regulate this area of activity at the departmental level:
- Regulation on patent-licensing, inventive and rationalization work in the system of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine (Order of the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine No. 287 dated 20.09.2022)
- Methodical recommendations on the procedure for drafting, filing and reviewing an application for an innovation proposal (Order of the State Patent Office of Ukraine No. 131 of August 27, 1995).
- The IP-5 application form, approved by Order of the State Statistics Committee of Ukraine No. 469 dated 10.08.2004.
The lawyer said that applications for rationalization proposals are reviewed by the commission for novelty and usefulness within thirty days. If necessary, the rationalization proposal is submitted for additional analysis and expert opinion. After the proposal is recognized as an innovation and accepted for use, each of the co-authors receives a certificate.
I. Svetlichny emphasized that servicemen who are the authors of the most valuable inventions created in the course of their duties, as well as of rationalization proposals, may (if they need to participate in the development and verification of proposals) be temporarily released from their duties with the permission of their superior for up to 30 days.
«Intellectual property, like any other type of property, is often subject to unlawful actions by third parties and, accordingly, requires legal protection. At the same time, special attention should be paid to the protection of rights to such intellectual property that can serve the purposes of state defense», said H. Kolesnyk.
An example of the importance of protecting intellectual property in the defense sector was given by H. Kolesnyk, referring to case No. 757/11406/20-ц.
In 2016, the Armored Plant received a certificate of registration for a night sight that was approved for use by the Armed Forces of Ukraine. Two years later, the Ministry of Economy issued a patent for a utility model related to this device. And on the basis of the patent, the owner of the right to use the model demanded that the plant stop using the object of its intellectual property in any way. This threatened to stop the repair work on the defense order for the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine.
However, the company found that the Ministry had violated the terms of legal protection, as the combination of features of the model was publicly available in the world before the date of filing the application. Therefore, in March 2020, the plant filed a lawsuit to invalidate the patent.
The courts of all instances sided with the plaintiff. The key to the case was the expert's opinion, which concluded that as of the date of filing the application for the invention under the Ukrainian patent, all the features of the utility model claims under the Ukrainian patent were known, so the utility model under the patent does not meet the condition of patentability «novelty».
At the same time, the defendant did not provide the court with any evidence that would refute the correctness and completeness of this conclusion and did not file a petition for the appointment of an examination of the intellectual property object in the case.
Also, during the event, its participants determined the prospects for the development of inventions, organization of work of invention clubs at the Department of Military Training of the State Service of Ukraine for Specialized Transport and Exploration of the peculiarities of registration of patents of Ukraine for utility models and service inventions of military personnel.
Popular news
War
Are Europe's advocacy associations prepared for a potential war? V. Gvozdiy shared lessons from the Ukrainian experience
The continuity of the bar’s self-governance, the protection of professional registries and archives, as well as equal guarantees of employment for advocates, judges, and prosecutors must be enshrined in advance in legislation in the event of war or another emergency.
Educational events
How DISC helps manage «tigers», «monkeys», «elephants» and «turtles»
The same instruction from a manager may motivate one employee to take action, while leaving another without the necessary guidance. People perceive work tasks differently: for some, a deadline and the expected outcome are enough, while others need explanations, time or a detailed plan.
Legislation
The Verkhovna Rada is preparing a bill to implement the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer
Members of Parliament plan to introduce a bill in the near future to implement the main provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer. This parliamentary initiative may also prompt the government to expedite the preparation of the ratification package.
Educational events
What an advocate should consider when a fee dispute escalates into a complaint to the QDBC
If an advocate files a lawsuit seeking to recover fees from a client, the client may in turn file a complaint with the High Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar in an effort to compel the advocate to withdraw the lawsuit. How do the advocacy’s disciplinary bodies handle such cases?
Greetings
The UNBA honored the winners of the «In the language of prose» contest and opened a fashion exhibition
The competition was organized by the UNBA Committee on humanitarian issues and creative initiatives in cooperation with the Center for advocacy and legal research. Two dozen advocates from various regions of Ukraine submitted their works to the competition committee for consideration. The entries were evaluated based on originality, the relevance of the chosen topic and the level of technical skill.
Discussion
What is holding back funding for gas-fired power generation – discussion between businesses and banks at the UNBA
To provide loans for new gas-fired power generation projects, banks require a predictable cash flow, an investor’s equity contribution, and risk-sharing mechanisms. A business model that relies solely on a preferential gas price is not a sufficient basis for financing.
Educational events
Preparing a court argument: 7 tips for advocates
When preparing a courtroom speech, it is best to begin by formulating the decision the advocate is asking the court to render. Next, the structure of the speech should be built around this outcome, strong arguments should be selected, and weak points should be addressed.
Legislation
Advocates’ access to the TCC and the SP should be regulated by law – Ombudsman
The practice of denying advocates access to the premises of the TCC and the SP bears the hallmarks of systematic obstruction of the legal profession and deprives people of the opportunity to promptly obtain professional legal assistance. The procedure for such access must be codified in regulations issued by the Ministry of Defense.
Publications
Vasyl Kolishnyi, «Law and Business» Supporting mental health should become part of the professional culture of the Bar, - H. Udovenko
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection