The price of a claim for minor disputes will be significantly reduced - draft law
The current amounts of the claim price (as a criterion for classifying a case as minor) are significantly higher than the subsistence minimum and minimum wage and do not correspond to the understanding of the case and the dispute in it as minor. Accordingly, they should be revised downward.
Pursuant to the relevant decision of the Constitutional Court dated 22.11.202 No. 10-r(II)/2023, a group of MPs registered in the Verkhovna Rada Draft Law No. 11026 dated 19.02.2024 «On Amendments to the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine and the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine to Guarantee the Right to Judicial Protection in Minor Disputes».
Today, for the purposes of the Code of Civil Procedure, minor cases are considered to be:
- cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed one hundred times the minimum subsistence level for able-bodied persons;
- cases of minor complexity recognized by the court as minor (except for cases that are subject to consideration only under the rules of general action proceedings and cases where the amount of the claim exceeds two hundred and fifty minimum subsistence levels for able-bodied persons);
- consumer protection cases where the amount in controversy does not exceed two hundred and fifty times the minimum subsistence level for able-bodied persons.
Taking into account the conclusions of the Constitutional Court, the authors of the legislative initiative propose to replace the mentioned prices of the claim in Part 6 of Article 19 of the Civil Procedure Code with fifteen (instead of one hundred) and thirty (instead of two hundred and fifty) minimums, respectively.
In addition, according to the MPs, cases arising from labor relations should not be considered in the simplified lawsuit procedure (Article 274 of the Civil Procedure Code).
Similar amendments are proposed to Article 12 of the Code of Administrative Procedure. Thus, if the law is adopted in the wording of its draft, an appeal against a decision of a public authority on the basis of which it may claim to recover funds in an amount not exceeding fifteen (currently one hundred) times the subsistence minimum for able-bodied persons will be considered insignificant.
Cases involving disputes over decisions, actions and omissions of a public authority will be considered exclusively under the rules of general action proceedings, if the plaintiff also claims compensation for damage caused by such decisions, actions or omissions in an amount exceeding sixty (according to the current version of the Code of Administrative Procedure - five hundred) minimum subsistence levels for able-bodied persons.
According to the authors of the initiative, such regulations will guarantee citizens the right to judicial protection in minor disputes.
As a reminder, according to Article 131-2 of the Constitution, only lawyers can represent people in court. However, the law may provide for exceptions, including for minor disputes.
Popular news
Legislation
A bill implementing the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer has been introduced
The constitutional guarantees of legal aid, defense, and the independence of advocacy cannot be realized without protecting advocates from unwarranted interference in their professional activities, including searches, the seizure of professional materials and the use of criminal procedural mechanisms to exert pressure.
Abroad
The CCBE is discussing European justice and issues related to the protection of advocates
Today, October 2, a meeting of the Standing Committee of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) is taking place in Brussels. On the agenda are the protection of the advocate profession, the rule of law, attorney-client privilege, and changes in the European justice system.
Rule of Law Roadmap
The UNBA presented the key provisions of the future law on advocacy in Brussels
The Ukrainian National Bar Association presented its proposals for the upcoming law on advocacy, aligned with the Rule of Law Roadmap. The presentation covered topics such as access to the profession, self-governance, disciplinary procedures, professional development and guarantees for the practice of advocacy.
Educational events
Advocates were taught to voice their complaints without making accusations
In a difficult conversation, it’s easy to confuse facts with opinions, feelings with accusations, and requests with demands. How can you express dissatisfaction, explain your own needs, and propose a specific solution while still allowing your conversation partner the opportunity to refuse or suggest an alternative?
Guarantees of the practice of law
Unrestricted access to advocates' accounts poses a risk of client data disclosure — BCU
Information regarding transactions in the bank accounts of an advocate, a law firm, or a bar association from which clients can be identified, as well as the fact and subject matter of a request for legal assistance, the purpose of payments, and the amount of the fee constitutes attorney-client privilege. This rule applies regardless of whether the information also constitutes banking information and is in the possession of a bank.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The contract provides for a video conference, but the court requires in-person appearance: how should an advocate proceed?
Many advocates today work remotely; therefore, their agreements with clients provide for the provision of legal assistance via videoconferencing. However, this form of work does not, in and of itself, create an unconditional obligation for the court to conduct every hearing via videoconference.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Independent oversight is necessary before using CISA materials against an advocate – Lidiya Izovitova
Before the prosecution uses information obtained during covert investigative actions and related to an advocate’s activities, independent procedural oversight must be conducted. It is necessary to determine whether such information is covered by attorney-client privilege and whether it may be disclosed.
Legislation
Handing over a bank card should not automatically constitute a crime – UNBA
Criminal liability for transferring a bank card or access to an account should arise only if it is proven that the person knew the card or account would be used as a means to commit an intentional crime. The mere fact that a payment instrument was transferred or that an account was used by a third party is not sufficient.
Publications
Vasyl Kolishnyi, «Law and Business» Supporting mental health should become part of the professional culture of the Bar, - H. Udovenko
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
