The price of a claim for minor disputes will be significantly reduced - draft law
The current amounts of the claim price (as a criterion for classifying a case as minor) are significantly higher than the subsistence minimum and minimum wage and do not correspond to the understanding of the case and the dispute in it as minor. Accordingly, they should be revised downward.
Pursuant to the relevant decision of the Constitutional Court dated 22.11.202 No. 10-r(II)/2023, a group of MPs registered in the Verkhovna Rada Draft Law No. 11026 dated 19.02.2024 «On Amendments to the Civil Procedure Code of Ukraine and the Code of Administrative Procedure of Ukraine to Guarantee the Right to Judicial Protection in Minor Disputes».
Today, for the purposes of the Code of Civil Procedure, minor cases are considered to be:
- cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed one hundred times the minimum subsistence level for able-bodied persons;
- cases of minor complexity recognized by the court as minor (except for cases that are subject to consideration only under the rules of general action proceedings and cases where the amount of the claim exceeds two hundred and fifty minimum subsistence levels for able-bodied persons);
- consumer protection cases where the amount in controversy does not exceed two hundred and fifty times the minimum subsistence level for able-bodied persons.
Taking into account the conclusions of the Constitutional Court, the authors of the legislative initiative propose to replace the mentioned prices of the claim in Part 6 of Article 19 of the Civil Procedure Code with fifteen (instead of one hundred) and thirty (instead of two hundred and fifty) minimums, respectively.
In addition, according to the MPs, cases arising from labor relations should not be considered in the simplified lawsuit procedure (Article 274 of the Civil Procedure Code).
Similar amendments are proposed to Article 12 of the Code of Administrative Procedure. Thus, if the law is adopted in the wording of its draft, an appeal against a decision of a public authority on the basis of which it may claim to recover funds in an amount not exceeding fifteen (currently one hundred) times the subsistence minimum for able-bodied persons will be considered insignificant.
Cases involving disputes over decisions, actions and omissions of a public authority will be considered exclusively under the rules of general action proceedings, if the plaintiff also claims compensation for damage caused by such decisions, actions or omissions in an amount exceeding sixty (according to the current version of the Code of Administrative Procedure - five hundred) minimum subsistence levels for able-bodied persons.
According to the authors of the initiative, such regulations will guarantee citizens the right to judicial protection in minor disputes.
As a reminder, according to Article 131-2 of the Constitution, only lawyers can represent people in court. However, the law may provide for exceptions, including for minor disputes.
Popular news
Practice of law
BCU strengthens its position on the right of advocate to prioritize cases
In legal practice, it is not uncommon for court hearings in different cases to be scheduled at the same time. This raises the question: which case should the advocate attend first, and can the court interfere with this decision?
Edition
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions
The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.
Announcements
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun
The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».
Abroad
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?
Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.
Discussion
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability
On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.
Abroad
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues
The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel
The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.
Self-government
Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly
A unitary state requires uniform standards for access to the profession and disciplinary responsibility, which is why the Ukrainian National Bar Association acts as a professional organization. Accusations of monopoly are false, because public associations cannot replace professional self-government.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences