Lawyers found violations of defense guarantees in the in absentia procedure

Since the beginning of the full-scale invasion, the number of crimes against the foundations of national security has increased significantly. Since the suspects are often outside Ukraine, the investigation is carried out in absentia with the involvement of lawyers from the FLA system.
The practice of organizing the provision of free legal aid in such proceedings was analyzed by the Committee of the Ukrainian National Bar Association on Legal Aid and set out in a report presented by the UNBA last week.
In particular, the document notes the facts of systematic implementation of unconstructive positions by the bodies of the FLA system:
- during a joint event with the participation of representatives of the bar, the director of the Coordination Center for Legal Aid Provision (CC) publicly expressed the position of accusing lawyers involved in criminal proceedings in the absence of a suspect (accused) of violating the Rules of Professional Conduct.
- the CC draws conclusions about the agreement or disagreement with the client solely on the basis of the fact of a personal meeting between the lawyer and the client. In fact, the suspects are deprived of the opportunity to coordinate their position with the lawyer by phone or in any other way. Lawyers are forced to meet in person, as the possibility of providing legal aid to a person with whom they have not met in person is denied.
- the FLA authorities created instability in the rules of validity of assignments in cases where a special pre-trial investigation was conducted.
- representatives of the CD publicly state that the powers of the advocate are terminated upon completion of the special pre-trial investigation. According to the power of attorney issued at the stage of pre-trial investigation, the lawyer does not have the authority to participate in the preparatory court hearing. Such a position of the CC caused total concern of lawyers and led to massive postponements of trials to update the powers of defense counsel.
- the positions expressed by the SLC potentially threaten to put pressure on the right of the advocate to choose a procedural position in the case, which consists in independent participation in the hearing in the absence of the client, a statement to the investigating judge that the client is not aware of the petition filed, violation of the method of notification of the suspect, etc. In such cases, the payment for the lawyer's participation in the court hearing is jeopardized, and the FLA client is restricted in his or her rights compared to the client of a lawyer under a contract. The problem was resolved with the UNBA's intervention. The Bar Council of Ukraine, by its decision of 27.12.2022 No. 183, approved the Clarification on the participation of lawyers in criminal proceedings in the absence of a suspect or accused, after which the FLA centers stopped this negative practice.
The report suggests that the proper way to solve these problems is to optimize criminal procedural legislation with the participation of the bar, as well as to establish constructive cooperation between the FLA authorities and lawyers in order to coordinate positions in such new and complex situations.
Popular news

Discussion
Without the protection of advocates, there will be no fair trials in Ukraine — forum in Odesa
Identifying an advocate with their client undermines the foundations of justice, as it deprives individuals of the opportunity to exercise their right to defense, forces advocates to avoid participating in high-profile cases, and ultimately renders procedural guarantees meaningless. Without this, fair trial is impossible.

Legislation
What data is sufficient to initiate an investigation – UNBA comments on draft law No. 12439
The problem of law enforcement pressure on business remains one of the most acute for the Ukrainian economy. The lack of regulation of certain procedures in the Criminal Procedure Code leads to abuses, as a result of which entrepreneurs find themselves in a state of legal uncertainty.

Guarantees of the practice of law
The Verkhovna Rada is waiting for the Minister of Justice to take action on signing the Convention on the protection of t…
Ukraine, which was directly involved in the preparation of the world's first Council of Europe Convention on the protection of the profession of advocate, has still not signed it. There appear to be no formal objections, but no real steps have been taken towards accession either.

Abroad
Australian advocate apologizes in court for fake AI quotes
In Australia, a royal advocate apologized to a judge for submitting documents in a criminal case against a teenager accused of murder that contained fabricated quotes and non-existent court decisions generated by artificial intelligence.

Legislation
Support for the defense industry should not upset local budgets, - UNBA
It is necessary to create additional incentives for enterprises in the defense and industrial complex, while ensuring the balance of the budget system and the predictability of both revenues and expenditures of local self-government.

Legislation
UNBA warns of extreme financial risks for defense industry companies
The lack of transparent control over the activities of the Ministry of Defense as a regulator, as well as excessive sanctions for leaving the Defense City regime, create risks for defense enterprises that could lead to their bankruptcy.

Guarantees of the practice of law
BCU reports interference by a member of the High Council of Justice in the activities of a lawyer and submits officia…
The Bar Council of Ukraine, having considered the statement of advocate Oleksandr Vikhrov, established the fact of interference by Roman Maselko, a member of the High Council of Justice, in the advocacy activities, violation of attorney-client privilege, and exceeding his powers in evaluating a candidate for the position of judge.

Legislation
Consent to arrest advocates must be given by bar self-regulatory bodies
Granting the High Council of Justice the power to give consent to the detention of an advocate or to keep him in custody would be a direct interference in the activities of the Ukrainian advocacy. This contradicts the principle of independence of the advocacy guaranteed by the Constitution and laws.
Publications

Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences