7 main problems of the FLA system outlined in the report: broadcast of the presentation

The deepening crisis in the relations between the state and the bar in the field of free legal aid, the UNBA's position being ignored for a long time, has led to fundamental changes characterized by the loss of the primary focus on the individual as the highest value by the FLA system.
This is stated in the Report on topical issues of the functioning of the legal aid system in Ukraine, which is presented today, March 19, by the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
The document, prepared by the UNBA Committee on Legal Aid, demonstrates the cause-and-effect relationships that determine the existence of problems in the FLA system and effective ways to solve them.
The main problems include:
1. Monitoring the quality of FLA provision.
2. Distribution and fulfillment of orders for FLA provision.
3. Payment for the services of lawyers.
4. Appointment of a lawyer to participate in a separate procedural action.
5. Participation of advocates in criminal proceedings in absentia.
6. Identification of the advocate with the client.
7. Termination of the provision of free legal aid in suspended criminal proceedings.
Despite the proactive partnership, creation and testing of its own (not funded by the state budget) resources for the administration and service provision of the Bar, the Ukrainian National Bar Association was artificially deprived of the status of a partner in the implementation of the state policy in the field of FLA provision, and its institutional capacity was completely ignored.
In particular, in the absence of any need for this and simultaneously with the existence of working mechanisms in the bar, the state has created and financed at the expense of taxpayers the procedures for selecting lawyers, their training, maintaining their registry, assessing the quality of their work, resources for communication with them, etc., which are implemented by the state institution - the Coordination Center for Legal Aid Provision. At the same time, the quality of the work of advocates is assessed by the staff of state bodies or local governments, who often have no idea about the specifics of the work of an advocate.
The UNBA systematically states that all this leads to a distortion of the model of the Bar and violation of the rights of lawyers. In addition, the ultimate bearer of the burden of all negative changes is the recipient of assistance - the one for whom and for whom this system was supposed to work.
In addition, a significant portion of the funds allocated for FLA is spent on the administration of resources and procedures that the bar proposed to implement for the benefit of legal aid recipients without funding from the state budget.
The report also notes that the constitutional and legislatively defined model of guaranteeing the right to professional legal aid to everyone includes a special executor of the organization of its provision - the bar. And it is the advocates, as special entities that meet specially defined requirements, and the activities they carry out to provide legal aid, the quality of which is guaranteed by special procedures and mechanisms, that are the defining elements of this model of providing everyone with professional, not just any, legal aid. In this context, the legal grounds and content of the activities of the FLA centers are of particular importance, since they actually perform not only administrative functions of mediation between other subjects of legal relations on the provision of FLA (between recipients and providers of FLA), but also a significant part of substantive functions.
Popular news

Advocacy
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure
The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

Advocacy
Does the mobilization of a lawyer violate the human right to defense - conclusion of the Supreme Court
Article 335 of the CPC provides for the suspension of court proceedings only in cases where the accused was called up for military service during mobilization. However, this provision does not apply to the mobilization of a defense counsel.

Advocacy
Shoulder straps do not fit the robe: Lidiya Izovitova analyzes models of military courts restoration
The Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy held a working meeting to discuss draft laws that provide for the establishment and operation of military courts in Ukraine on a permanent basis. The Institute of Advocacy presented its reservations regarding this initiative.

Advocacy
UNBA Committee for the protection of advocates' rights responds to accusations regarding the case of «hacker lawyers»
Dzerkalo Tyzhnia's publications about «hacker lawyers» contain false information, distortions and manipulations that undermine the authority of the Bar. They are a form of unlawful pressure on the UNBA and may be an element of a paid-for campaign.

Advocacy
Problems of implementation of the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer discussed in the Verkhovna Rada
On April 16, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on Legal Policy held a joint working meeting to discuss the feasibility of implementing the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer and introducing the necessary amendments to the current legislation.

Advocacy
The BCU creates a working group to monitor violations of the rights of lawyers and will consider appealing to the Verkhovna…
During an extraordinary meeting on April 16, 2025, the Bar Council of Ukraine decided to establish a working group to monitor and summarize the facts of violations of the rights of lawyers and guarantees of the practice of law over the past three years, including the situation with the detention of lawyer Olga Panchenko.

Advocacy
Judicial independence: a priority that has not yet become a reality
Protecting judges from interference is a priority, but its effectiveness in practice raises questions. The High Council of Justice discussed ensuring judicial independence and the authority of justice.

Advocacy
Temporary protection, work, study: what Ukrainians should know about France and UK
What is the procedure for obtaining temporary protection status in France and the UK? When can it be refused and is it possible to appeal such a decision? What are the options for legalization and change of status? What about employment, education and business opportunities?
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…