7 main problems of the FLA system outlined in the report: broadcast of the presentation

The deepening crisis in the relations between the state and the bar in the field of free legal aid, the UNBA's position being ignored for a long time, has led to fundamental changes characterized by the loss of the primary focus on the individual as the highest value by the FLA system.
This is stated in the Report on topical issues of the functioning of the legal aid system in Ukraine, which is presented today, March 19, by the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
The document, prepared by the UNBA Committee on Legal Aid, demonstrates the cause-and-effect relationships that determine the existence of problems in the FLA system and effective ways to solve them.
The main problems include:
1. Monitoring the quality of FLA provision.
2. Distribution and fulfillment of orders for FLA provision.
3. Payment for the services of lawyers.
4. Appointment of a lawyer to participate in a separate procedural action.
5. Participation of advocates in criminal proceedings in absentia.
6. Identification of the advocate with the client.
7. Termination of the provision of free legal aid in suspended criminal proceedings.
Despite the proactive partnership, creation and testing of its own (not funded by the state budget) resources for the administration and service provision of the Bar, the Ukrainian National Bar Association was artificially deprived of the status of a partner in the implementation of the state policy in the field of FLA provision, and its institutional capacity was completely ignored.
In particular, in the absence of any need for this and simultaneously with the existence of working mechanisms in the bar, the state has created and financed at the expense of taxpayers the procedures for selecting lawyers, their training, maintaining their registry, assessing the quality of their work, resources for communication with them, etc., which are implemented by the state institution - the Coordination Center for Legal Aid Provision. At the same time, the quality of the work of advocates is assessed by the staff of state bodies or local governments, who often have no idea about the specifics of the work of an advocate.
The UNBA systematically states that all this leads to a distortion of the model of the Bar and violation of the rights of lawyers. In addition, the ultimate bearer of the burden of all negative changes is the recipient of assistance - the one for whom and for whom this system was supposed to work.
In addition, a significant portion of the funds allocated for FLA is spent on the administration of resources and procedures that the bar proposed to implement for the benefit of legal aid recipients without funding from the state budget.
The report also notes that the constitutional and legislatively defined model of guaranteeing the right to professional legal aid to everyone includes a special executor of the organization of its provision - the bar. And it is the advocates, as special entities that meet specially defined requirements, and the activities they carry out to provide legal aid, the quality of which is guaranteed by special procedures and mechanisms, that are the defining elements of this model of providing everyone with professional, not just any, legal aid. In this context, the legal grounds and content of the activities of the FLA centers are of particular importance, since they actually perform not only administrative functions of mediation between other subjects of legal relations on the provision of FLA (between recipients and providers of FLA), but also a significant part of substantive functions.
Popular news

Discussion
Without the protection of advocates, there will be no fair trials in Ukraine — forum in Odesa
Identifying an advocate with their client undermines the foundations of justice, as it deprives individuals of the opportunity to exercise their right to defense, forces advocates to avoid participating in high-profile cases, and ultimately renders procedural guarantees meaningless. Without this, fair trial is impossible.

Legislation
What data is sufficient to initiate an investigation – UNBA comments on draft law No. 12439
The problem of law enforcement pressure on business remains one of the most acute for the Ukrainian economy. The lack of regulation of certain procedures in the Criminal Procedure Code leads to abuses, as a result of which entrepreneurs find themselves in a state of legal uncertainty.

Guarantees of the practice of law
The Verkhovna Rada is waiting for the Minister of Justice to take action on signing the Convention on the protection of t…
Ukraine, which was directly involved in the preparation of the world's first Council of Europe Convention on the protection of the profession of advocate, has still not signed it. There appear to be no formal objections, but no real steps have been taken towards accession either.

Abroad
Australian advocate apologizes in court for fake AI quotes
In Australia, a royal advocate apologized to a judge for submitting documents in a criminal case against a teenager accused of murder that contained fabricated quotes and non-existent court decisions generated by artificial intelligence.

Legislation
Support for the defense industry should not upset local budgets, - UNBA
It is necessary to create additional incentives for enterprises in the defense and industrial complex, while ensuring the balance of the budget system and the predictability of both revenues and expenditures of local self-government.

Legislation
UNBA warns of extreme financial risks for defense industry companies
The lack of transparent control over the activities of the Ministry of Defense as a regulator, as well as excessive sanctions for leaving the Defense City regime, create risks for defense enterprises that could lead to their bankruptcy.

Guarantees of the practice of law
BCU reports interference by a member of the High Council of Justice in the activities of a lawyer and submits officia…
The Bar Council of Ukraine, having considered the statement of advocate Oleksandr Vikhrov, established the fact of interference by Roman Maselko, a member of the High Council of Justice, in the advocacy activities, violation of attorney-client privilege, and exceeding his powers in evaluating a candidate for the position of judge.

Legislation
Consent to arrest advocates must be given by bar self-regulatory bodies
Granting the High Council of Justice the power to give consent to the detention of an advocate or to keep him in custody would be a direct interference in the activities of the Ukrainian advocacy. This contradicts the principle of independence of the advocacy guaranteed by the Constitution and laws.
Publications

Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences