Deserters will be released from liability under two conditions
The legislative initiative to introduce mechanisms for exempting members of the Armed Forces from criminal liability for committing a military criminal offense deserves support. At the same time, it contains controversial provisions.
This was noted by the UNBA Committee on Criminal Law and Procedure following the analysis of the draft Law No. 11322 dated 06.06.2024 «On Amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine, the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine and Other Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Improving Criminal Liability for Crimes Against the Established Procedure for Performing or Completing Military Service during Martial Law».
In particular, the document proposes to supplement Article 401 of the CPC with conditions under which a person who first committed a crime under Article 407 (unauthorized leaving of a military unit or place of service) or Article 408 (desertion) of the Criminal Code may be released from criminal liability:
1) before the end of the pre-trial investigation, the person voluntarily informed the investigator or prosecutor of his/her intention to return to the military unit or place of service to continue military service;
2) the commander (chief) of the military unit (institution) has agreed to the continuation of military service by such person.
If these grounds are present, the prosecutor will have to obtain a written consent of the commander (chief) of the military unit (institution) on the possibility of continuing the military service of the suspect.
Taking into account the provisions of Article 44 of the Criminal Code, the UNBA believes that the wording of the provision «a person may be released from criminal liability» should be replaced with «a person is released from criminal liability».
Also, a person's consent to continue military service must be the result of a positive assessment by the commander of the person's previous performance in the position. However, if the consent can be granted by the commander (chief) of any military unit (institution), the possibility of achieving the goal of the draft law is doubtful. In addition, this approach contains corruption factors.
The full comments and suggestions of the UNBA to the draft law No. 11322 can be found at the link.
Popular news
Interaction
A manifesto on AI in law was presented in Europe. The UNBA has joined the initiative
On June 24, as part of European Legal Sovereignty Day, which took place in Brussels, the Manifesto for a Referential of Human Guarantee in the Legal Use of AI was presented.
Court practice
Lidiya Izovitova identified 7 challenges in administrative proceedings for advocates
The predictability of judicial practice, jurisdictional disputes, cassation filters, enforcement of judgments against the state, the burden of proof, written proceedings, and guarantees for the practice of law remain key issues in administrative justice for advocates.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Preparations for the ratification of the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer are in the final stages
On June 9, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on legal policy held a working meeting to prepare for the ratification of the Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer. The Ministry of Justice and the Ukrainian National Bar Association agreed on approaches to draft laws regarding the ratification and implementation of the Convention. Participants have been given 10 days to prepare the draft laws that will be submitted for consideration.
Announcements
Internships at German law firms: IRZ is accepting applications from Ukrainians
In 2026, the German Foundation for International Legal Cooperation (IRZ) plans to organize a multilateral internship program for young advocates from partner countries. Participants will attend an introductory seminar in Bonn and complete internships at law firms in Germany.
Appointment
A representative of the UNBA will be stationed in Düsseldorf
By Order No. 159 of the President of the UNBA, BCU, dated June 3, 2026, advocate Vyacheslav Us has been appointed as the representative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association in the Federal Republic of Germany, in the city of Düsseldorf.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Restrictions on the right to legal assistance in pretrial detention centers are unacceptable – statement by the BCU
The Bar Council of Ukraine has stated that it is unacceptable to restrict the right to professional legal assistance, the guarantees of legal practice, and the confidentiality of communications between advocates and clients in pretrial detention facilities operated by the State Criminal-Executive Service of Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
The UNBA is expanding its legal support services for war victims
The UNBA Committee on the protection of victims of armed aggression against Ukraine, compensation mechanisms and European integration legal support for recovery continues its work on assistance programs for military personnel, veterans, their family members and businesses that have suffered damage as a result of the war.
Discussion
Guarantees for the protection of citizens' rights during pre-trial investigations were discussed at the UNBA
Protecting citizens’ rights during the pre-trial investigation requires, above all, proper judicial oversight, clear rules for the parties to criminal proceedings, and practical mechanisms for addressing violations.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates