Deserters will be released from liability under two conditions

Advocacy
16:49 Thu 11.07.24 2261 Reviews
Print

The legislative initiative to introduce mechanisms for exempting members of the Armed Forces from criminal liability for committing a military criminal offense deserves support. At the same time, it contains controversial provisions.

This was noted by the UNBA Committee on Criminal Law and Procedure following the analysis of the draft Law No. 11322 dated 06.06.2024 «On Amendments to the Criminal Code of Ukraine, the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine and Other Legislative Acts of Ukraine on Improving Criminal Liability for Crimes Against the Established Procedure for Performing or Completing Military Service during Martial Law».

In particular, the document proposes to supplement Article 401 of the CPC with conditions under which a person who first committed a crime under Article 407 (unauthorized leaving of a military unit or place of service) or Article 408 (desertion) of the Criminal Code may be released from criminal liability:

1) before the end of the pre-trial investigation, the person voluntarily informed the investigator or prosecutor of his/her intention to return to the military unit or place of service to continue military service;

2) the commander (chief) of the military unit (institution) has agreed to the continuation of military service by such person.

If these grounds are present, the prosecutor will have to obtain a written consent of the commander (chief) of the military unit (institution) on the possibility of continuing the military service of the suspect.

Taking into account the provisions of Article 44 of the Criminal Code, the UNBA believes that the wording of the provision «a person may be released from criminal liability» should be replaced with «a person is released from criminal liability».

Also, a person's consent to continue military service must be the result of a positive assessment by the commander of the person's previous performance in the position. However, if the consent can be granted by the commander (chief) of any military unit (institution), the possibility of achieving the goal of the draft law is doubtful. In addition, this approach contains corruption factors.

The full comments and suggestions of the UNBA to the draft law No. 11322 can be found at the link.

Popular news

Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation

Interaction

Protecting the rights of service members: The UNBA and the Military Ombudsman have agreed on cooperation

Servicemembers, reservists, conscripts during training exercises, members of local community volunteer units, and other individuals covered by the Law «On the Military Ombudsman» should have better access to professional legal assistance.

9:59 Fri 27.03.26 144
Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed

Rule of Law Roadmap

Reform without data and advocacy: what the Ministry of Justice’s launch has revealed

The Ministry of Justice hosted the first meeting of the working group on bar reform. But instead of professional preparation of legislative changes, we saw exactly what Armada Network Director Dale Armstrong had spoken about the day before in Kyiv: not reform, but a struggle for control over the agenda through a narrow circle of “stakeholders” who create an echo chamber of influence for themselves.

16:42 Mon 23.03.26 171
Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv

Rule of Law Roadmap

Advocacy, European integration and the limits of intervention: an American report presented in Kyiv

Following its presentation in Brussels, the report «The Ukrainian advocacy in the context of the rule of law and European integration» made its way to Kyiv. It highlighted critical issues both in understanding the very nature of the self-governing profession and in the emergence of a «shadow market» surrounding the Ukrainian advocacy.

15:26 Fri 20.03.26 179
ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails

Discussion

ETAIDF and MMC: where the system fails

The new system for assessing a person’s daily functioning and the practice of undergoing medical-legal examinations have already raised numerous questions — ranging from unclear procedures to difficulties in appealing decisions. These issues were examined by advocates during the roundtable discussion «Problematic issues of the ETAIDF and MMC», organized by the UNBA Committee on the protection of the rights of persons with disabilities and the All-Ukrainian public organization «Human rights union of persons with disabilities».

13:58 Thu 19.03.26 138
Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change

Rule of Law Roadmap

Access to the advocate profession: a subgroup has identified the direction of change

On Monday, March 16, a meeting was held of the subgroup «Access to the profession and training of advocates. Organizational forms of legal practice» of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap.

18:14 Wed 18.03.26 130
A representative of the UNBA has arrived in Cairo

Appointment

A representative of the UNBA has arrived in Cairo

Advocate Irena Maria Ostrozka-Sangushko has been appointed as the representative of the Ukrainian National Bar Association in the Arab Republic of Egypt, in the city of Cairo. The corresponding Order No. 80, dated March 10, 2026, was signed by the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova.

15:42 Wed 18.03.26 102
Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform

Rule of Law Roadmap

Organization of advocacy: subgroup agrees on approaches to regulatory reform

On March 13, a meeting was held of the «Organization of the advocacy and self-government» subgroup of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding bar reform. The event was conducted via videoconference.

18:03 Mon 16.03.26 148
Where does legal information end and legal assistance begin?

Abroad

Where does legal information end and legal assistance begin?

Law firms find themselves in a dilemma: they want to make the most of artificial intelligence, but at the same time, more and more people are entrusting their legal matters to large language models. And this, as experts point out, entails countless risks.

15:56 Fri 13.03.26 113

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл