Payment of court fees for a non-property claim: what should be changed

Advocacy
16:09 Mon 15.07.24 110 Reviews
Print

An attempt to simplify the rules for paying court fees may lead to a situation of legal uncertainty when there is no regulatory rule in case of filing a lawsuit with several non-property claims.

This was warned by the Committee of the Ukrainian National Bar Association on Civil Law and Procedure following the analysis of the draft Law No. 11368 of 24.06.2024 «On Amendments to Article 6 of the Law of Ukraine «On Court Fee» regarding the payment of court fees for non-property claims».

As of today, pursuant to Part 3 of the said Article, the court fee for filing a claim that is both property and non-property in nature is paid at the rates established for property and non-property claims.

However, if the statement of claim combines two or more non-property claims, the court fee shall be paid for each non-property claim.

And the implementation of this rule leads to confusion in determining the amount of court fees. For example, in cases of eviction of several persons from residential premises, in some cases, the court proceeded from the fact that the court fee is payable as a single non-property claim, and in others - that the eviction of each person specified in the statement of claim is an independent non-property claim, and therefore the court fee must be paid separately for each of such claims (see the resolution of the Joint Chamber of the CCC of the Supreme Court of 18.09.2023 in case No. 758/5118/21).

Therefore, in cases where the plaintiff combines non-property claims against several defendants in one claim, the author of the legislative initiative proposes to replace two paragraphs of Part 3 of Article 6 of the Law with one paragraph as follows:

«For filing a claim that has both property and non-property nature, the court fee shall be paid at the rates established for claims of property and non-property nature (regardless of the number of non-property claims)».

But the UNBA drew attention to the construction of the provisions of Part 3 of Article 6 of the Law. Its first paragraph concerns the combination of property and non-property claims in one statement of claim, while the second paragraph concerns several non-property claims.

Therefore, if the law is implemented in the wording proposed by Draft Law No. 11368, there will be no regulation at all for cases where only non-property claims are combined in a statement of claim.

That is why, in the opinion of the UNBA Committee, it is more appropriate to leave the first paragraph in the current version, and to amend the second one as follows: «If the statement of claim combines two or more non-property claims, the court fee shall be paid in the amount of one non-property claim». In this case, the principle of legal certainty will be respected, as well as the possibilities for protecting civil rights and interests of a person will be expanded.

The full text of the comments and suggestions can be found at the link.

Popular news

Another conflict with the TCC: an advocate's leg was broken and his client jumped out of a window

Advocacy

Another conflict with the TCC: an advocate's leg was broken and his client jumped out of a window

On June 19, at the premises of the military medical commission, where a bus from the Krasnograd Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support delivered several people, an incident occurred involving the use of physical force against an advocate.

13:34 Fri 20.06.25 102
The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of the HQCJ

Advocacy

The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of t…

On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

17:29 Fri 13.06.25 115
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession

Advocacy

UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession

The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

14:19 Fri 06.06.25 119
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure

Advocacy

Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure

The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

16:35 Fri 30.05.25 198
BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy

Advocacy

BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy

The Bar Council of Ukraine will appeal to the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, Vasyl Malyuk, regarding the verification of information about «negative trends in the legal profession» disseminated by some media outlets on behalf of the SSU.

17:34 Wed 14.05.25 152
Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature

Advocacy

Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature

Thirteen member states of the Council of Europe have signed the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate, which was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on March 12, 2025. Four more countries will do so today. Ukraine is not among them.

9:28 Wed 14.05.25 179
BCU initiates resolution of the issue of visits by advocates to convicted persons

Advocacy

BCU initiates resolution of the issue of visits by advocates to convicted persons

Article 110 of the Criminal Enforcement Code guarantees convicted persons confidentiality of meetings with their advocate. One of the important elements is the possibility to communicate with an advocate in a room without a solid partition. In practice, this provision of the law is systematically violated.

12:32 Wed 07.05.25 135
Advocates, academics, and experts examine problems in forensic examination (video)

Advocacy

Advocates, academics, and experts examine problems in forensic examination (video)

The Ukrainian National Bar Association, in cooperation with leading scientific and research institutes of forensic expertise, organized a round table on expert support for legal practice.

14:39 Mon 05.05.25 156

Надішліть файл із текстом публікації у форматі *.doc, фотографію за тематикою у розмірі 640х400 та Ваше фото.

Оберіть файл