Payment of court fees for a non-property claim: what should be changed
An attempt to simplify the rules for paying court fees may lead to a situation of legal uncertainty when there is no regulatory rule in case of filing a lawsuit with several non-property claims.
This was warned by the Committee of the Ukrainian National Bar Association on Civil Law and Procedure following the analysis of the draft Law No. 11368 of 24.06.2024 «On Amendments to Article 6 of the Law of Ukraine «On Court Fee» regarding the payment of court fees for non-property claims».
As of today, pursuant to Part 3 of the said Article, the court fee for filing a claim that is both property and non-property in nature is paid at the rates established for property and non-property claims.
However, if the statement of claim combines two or more non-property claims, the court fee shall be paid for each non-property claim.
And the implementation of this rule leads to confusion in determining the amount of court fees. For example, in cases of eviction of several persons from residential premises, in some cases, the court proceeded from the fact that the court fee is payable as a single non-property claim, and in others - that the eviction of each person specified in the statement of claim is an independent non-property claim, and therefore the court fee must be paid separately for each of such claims (see the resolution of the Joint Chamber of the CCC of the Supreme Court of 18.09.2023 in case No. 758/5118/21).
Therefore, in cases where the plaintiff combines non-property claims against several defendants in one claim, the author of the legislative initiative proposes to replace two paragraphs of Part 3 of Article 6 of the Law with one paragraph as follows:
«For filing a claim that has both property and non-property nature, the court fee shall be paid at the rates established for claims of property and non-property nature (regardless of the number of non-property claims)».
But the UNBA drew attention to the construction of the provisions of Part 3 of Article 6 of the Law. Its first paragraph concerns the combination of property and non-property claims in one statement of claim, while the second paragraph concerns several non-property claims.
Therefore, if the law is implemented in the wording proposed by Draft Law No. 11368, there will be no regulation at all for cases where only non-property claims are combined in a statement of claim.
That is why, in the opinion of the UNBA Committee, it is more appropriate to leave the first paragraph in the current version, and to amend the second one as follows: «If the statement of claim combines two or more non-property claims, the court fee shall be paid in the amount of one non-property claim». In this case, the principle of legal certainty will be respected, as well as the possibilities for protecting civil rights and interests of a person will be expanded.
The full text of the comments and suggestions can be found at the link.
Popular news
Legislation
A bill implementing the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer has been introduced
The constitutional guarantees of legal aid, defense, and the independence of advocacy cannot be realized without protecting advocates from unwarranted interference in their professional activities, including searches, the seizure of professional materials and the use of criminal procedural mechanisms to exert pressure.
Abroad
The CCBE is discussing European justice and issues related to the protection of advocates
Today, October 2, a meeting of the Standing Committee of the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE) is taking place in Brussels. On the agenda are the protection of the advocate profession, the rule of law, attorney-client privilege, and changes in the European justice system.
Rule of Law Roadmap
The UNBA presented the key provisions of the future law on advocacy in Brussels
The Ukrainian National Bar Association presented its proposals for the upcoming law on advocacy, aligned with the Rule of Law Roadmap. The presentation covered topics such as access to the profession, self-governance, disciplinary procedures, professional development and guarantees for the practice of advocacy.
Educational events
Advocates were taught to voice their complaints without making accusations
In a difficult conversation, it’s easy to confuse facts with opinions, feelings with accusations, and requests with demands. How can you express dissatisfaction, explain your own needs, and propose a specific solution while still allowing your conversation partner the opportunity to refuse or suggest an alternative?
Guarantees of the practice of law
The paradoxes of urgency: is it possible to investigate a crime before it is committed?
On September 24 in Kyiv, National Police officers detained an advocate during an emergency search, having caught him in the act of committing a crime. At the time, the pretrial investigation in this case had already been ongoing for more than four months.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Unrestricted access to advocates' accounts poses a risk of client data disclosure — BCU
Information regarding transactions in the bank accounts of an advocate, a law firm, or a bar association from which clients can be identified, as well as the fact and subject matter of a request for legal assistance, the purpose of payments, and the amount of the fee constitutes attorney-client privilege. This rule applies regardless of whether the information also constitutes banking information and is in the possession of a bank.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The contract provides for a video conference, but the court requires in-person appearance: how should an advocate proceed?
Many advocates today work remotely; therefore, their agreements with clients provide for the provision of legal assistance via videoconferencing. However, this form of work does not, in and of itself, create an unconditional obligation for the court to conduct every hearing via videoconference.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Independent oversight is necessary before using CISA materials against an advocate – Lidiya Izovitova
Before the prosecution uses information obtained during covert investigative actions and related to an advocate’s activities, independent procedural oversight must be conducted. It is necessary to determine whether such information is covered by attorney-client privilege and whether it may be disclosed.
Publications
Vasyl Kolishnyi, «Law and Business» Supporting mental health should become part of the professional culture of the Bar, - H. Udovenko
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
