Requirements for judges' complaints against lawyers have been amended
Court decisions, rulings, special rulings or resolutions submitted by judges to the QDCB on the actions of advocates are not subject to the requirements established for an application (complaint) regarding the advocate's misconduct.
The relevant amendment to Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedure for Receiving and Considering Complaints Regarding Improper Conduct of an Advocate that May Result in Disciplinary Liability was introduced by the Bar Council of Ukraine at its meeting on October 21 (BCU Decision No. 67).
Until recently, judges had to take into account the requirements of the complaint when making a decision on the advocate's behavior. Although the possibility of a judge's response is provided for by the procedural codes, the Law «On the Bar» provides for its own procedure for initiating disciplinary proceedings, an obligatory element of which is the application (complaint).
Thus, according to its Art. 36, anyone who has knowledge of the facts of such behavior has the right to file a statement (complaint) with the Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar regarding the advocate's behavior that may be grounds for disciplinary liability.
The requirements for the application (complaint) are set forth in clause 14 of the said Regulations. Thus, it must contain the following information:
- the name of the qualification and disciplinary commission of the Bar of the region to which the application (complaint) is submitted;
- full name (title) of the applicant (complainant), position, place of work - for an official and an employee, postal address, as well as the number of the means of communication and e-mail address;
- full name of the advocate, whose behavior is the subject of the application (complaint), postal address, as well as the number of the means of communication and e-mail address, if known;
- a statement of the circumstances by which the applicant substantiates the fact of the presence of a disciplinary offense in the advocate's actions;
- requirements of the applicant (complainant).
In support of the circumstances that substantiate the application (complaint), the applicant (complainant) shall provide evidence, and in case of impossibility - shall indicate the evidence, the provision of which is impossible on their own, with the obligatory indication of the reasons and a request to the QDCB to request them.
A copy of the application (complaint) and copies of all documents attached thereto shall be attached to the application (complaint) for delivery to the advocate whose behavior is the subject of the application (complaint), except when the application (complaint) is submitted by e-mail. A written consent to the processing of personal data by the bar self-government bodies, including the collection, storage, use and dissemination, shall also be attached.
At the same time, the application (complaint), executed without observance of these and other requirements of clause 14 of the Regulations, shall be returned to the applicant (complainant) with the relevant explanation.
From now on, according to the amendments, the requirements for an application (complaint) set forth in Article 14 of these Regulations do not apply to court decisions, rulings, individual rulings or binding resolutions filed against the actions of advocates.
It is worth reminding that according to para. 10 of the Regulations, applications (complaints) concerning the advocate's conduct include: applications (complaints) of citizens; decisions, rulings, resolutions, appeals of judges; applications (complaints), resolutions, submissions of investigative bodies; applications (complaints), submissions of the heads of qualification and disciplinary commissions or its members, heads of regional bar councils or its members; applications (complaints) of advocates, law firms, law offices, associations of advocates, enterprises, institutions, organizations and other persons filed against the actions of advocates.
Popular news
Guarantees of the practice of law
Independent oversight is necessary before using CISA materials against an advocate – Lidiya Izovitova
Before the prosecution uses information obtained during covert investigative actions and related to an advocate’s activities, independent procedural oversight must be conducted. It is necessary to determine whether such information is covered by attorney-client privilege and whether it may be disclosed.
Self-government
Efforts to develop advocacy must be brought to fruition — A. Misyats
The Ukrainian advocacy profession is currently going through a critical phase. Amid the war, it must ensure the continuity of legal aid, defend the independence of the profession, and improve qualification and disciplinary procedures in accordance with European standards. The work that has been started must be brought to a practical conclusion.
Support
Protecting the legal profession, cybersecurity and support for advocates: common themes for the IBA and the UNBA
On September 18, a working meeting was held at the office of the Ukrainian National Bar Association with Executive Director of the International Bar Association (IBA) Mark Ellis. The parties discussed the Ukrainian advocacy profession’s participation in European legal processes, the protection of the UNBA’s digital infrastructure, psychological support for advocates and future areas of cooperation.
Educational events
Tax residency of Ukrainians abroad: what matters
The determination of tax residency for Ukrainians who have been living abroad for an extended period depends on the combination of their personal and economic ties to each country. The established status determines the procedure for reporting income, paying taxes and fulfilling CFC reporting obligations.
War
Are Europe's advocacy associations prepared for a potential war? V. Gvozdiy shared lessons from the Ukrainian experience
The continuity of the bar’s self-governance, the protection of professional registries and archives, as well as equal guarantees of employment for advocates, judges, and prosecutors must be enshrined in advance in legislation in the event of war or another emergency.
Legal defence of military personnel
Payments to military personnel require clear and uniform criteria — UNBA Committee
The vagueness of terms in subordinate regulatory acts leads to differing interpretations of the grounds for paying additional compensation to military personnel. The UNBA has proposed harmonizing these acts and establishing transparent criteria for the allocation of funds.
Discussion
Finding them isn't enough: issues surrounding the seizure and return of crypto assets
The technical structure of transactions does not automatically identify the person who controlled the crypto wallet, and courts have reached differing conclusions on whether a digital asset can be seized as physical evidence. So how can one prove ownership of such assets, enforce court orders, and return funds to victims?
Legislation
The UNBA will prepare guidelines on lawyers' requests
By the end of 2026, the UNBA Committee on the prevention of administrative offenses committed against advocates will develop guidelines on drafting advocate inquiries and responding to refusals to provide information. There are also plans to standardize the practice of applying Article 212-3 of the Code of Administrative Offenses.
Publications
Vasyl Kolishnyi, «Law and Business» Supporting mental health should become part of the professional culture of the Bar, - H. Udovenko
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection