Requirements for judges' complaints against lawyers have been amended
Court decisions, rulings, special rulings or resolutions submitted by judges to the QDCB on the actions of advocates are not subject to the requirements established for an application (complaint) regarding the advocate's misconduct.
The relevant amendment to Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedure for Receiving and Considering Complaints Regarding Improper Conduct of an Advocate that May Result in Disciplinary Liability was introduced by the Bar Council of Ukraine at its meeting on October 21 (BCU Decision No. 67).
Until recently, judges had to take into account the requirements of the complaint when making a decision on the advocate's behavior. Although the possibility of a judge's response is provided for by the procedural codes, the Law «On the Bar» provides for its own procedure for initiating disciplinary proceedings, an obligatory element of which is the application (complaint).
Thus, according to its Art. 36, anyone who has knowledge of the facts of such behavior has the right to file a statement (complaint) with the Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar regarding the advocate's behavior that may be grounds for disciplinary liability.
The requirements for the application (complaint) are set forth in clause 14 of the said Regulations. Thus, it must contain the following information:
- the name of the qualification and disciplinary commission of the Bar of the region to which the application (complaint) is submitted;
- full name (title) of the applicant (complainant), position, place of work - for an official and an employee, postal address, as well as the number of the means of communication and e-mail address;
- full name of the advocate, whose behavior is the subject of the application (complaint), postal address, as well as the number of the means of communication and e-mail address, if known;
- a statement of the circumstances by which the applicant substantiates the fact of the presence of a disciplinary offense in the advocate's actions;
- requirements of the applicant (complainant).
In support of the circumstances that substantiate the application (complaint), the applicant (complainant) shall provide evidence, and in case of impossibility - shall indicate the evidence, the provision of which is impossible on their own, with the obligatory indication of the reasons and a request to the QDCB to request them.
A copy of the application (complaint) and copies of all documents attached thereto shall be attached to the application (complaint) for delivery to the advocate whose behavior is the subject of the application (complaint), except when the application (complaint) is submitted by e-mail. A written consent to the processing of personal data by the bar self-government bodies, including the collection, storage, use and dissemination, shall also be attached.
At the same time, the application (complaint), executed without observance of these and other requirements of clause 14 of the Regulations, shall be returned to the applicant (complainant) with the relevant explanation.
From now on, according to the amendments, the requirements for an application (complaint) set forth in Article 14 of these Regulations do not apply to court decisions, rulings, individual rulings or binding resolutions filed against the actions of advocates.
It is worth reminding that according to para. 10 of the Regulations, applications (complaints) concerning the advocate's conduct include: applications (complaints) of citizens; decisions, rulings, resolutions, appeals of judges; applications (complaints), resolutions, submissions of investigative bodies; applications (complaints), submissions of the heads of qualification and disciplinary commissions or its members, heads of regional bar councils or its members; applications (complaints) of advocates, law firms, law offices, associations of advocates, enterprises, institutions, organizations and other persons filed against the actions of advocates.
Popular news
Legislation
Advocates have warned that the draft Labor Code would curtail workers' protections
Certain provisions of the draft Labor Code of Ukraine regarding collective labor disputes undermine labor protections and do not comply with constitutional and international standards.
Legal defence of military personnel
Representatives from the Ministry of Veterans Affairs and the UNBA discussed veterans' access to justice
On April 3, a working meeting was held at the Ministry of Veterans Affairs of Ukraine with representatives of the Ukrainian National Bar Association, dedicated to improving the effectiveness of legal protection for war veterans and their families.
Educational events
The right of minors to marry: how judicial oversight works
The issue of granting minors the right to marry lies at the intersection of family law, child protection, and judicial discretion. The UNBA Committee on family law dedicated a webinar held on March 30 to this very topic.
Interaction
The UNBA and the Coordination headquarters have agreed to cooperate in assisting those released from captivity
Servicemen released from captivity, family members of prisoners of war, civilians deprived of their personal liberty as a result of armed aggression, as well as persons missing in connection with the war, will gain additional opportunities to access legal assistance and protect their rights.
Self-government
BCU: The HCJ’s decisions undermine the constitutional guarantees of the independence of the advocacy profession
The Bar Council of Ukraine has concluded that, in its recent decisions, the High Council of Justice has, without legal grounds, called into question the right of bar self-governing bodies to protect the guarantees of legal practice and has, in effect, attempted to grant one of its members — who retains the status of an advocate — special immunity from the Rules of professional conduct and disciplinary responsibility.
Announcements
The Bar Council of Ukraine begins its meeting
Today, April 2, a meeting of the Bar Council of Ukraine is taking place in Kyiv. On the agenda are issues related to the activities of bar self-governing bodies, consideration of a decision by the High Council of Justice, a number of appeals, as well as a discussion of the current state and pressing issues regarding the functioning of the legal aid system.
Interaction
The UNBA and the National Guard have agreed to cooperate on legal protection for military personnel
Servicemembers of the National Guard, their family members, and veterans are to receive additional legal tools to protect their rights, while the National Guard’s legal services will receive methodological and expert support.
Discussion
Advocates barred from visiting clients in Temporary detention facility: discussion at the UNBA
The right to legal representation in the first hours following arrest is often rendered meaningless when advocates are denied access to their clients in temporary detention facilities due to bureaucratic barriers, requests for documents not required by the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the practice of detaining people there under the pretext of «security measures».
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates