Requirements for judges' complaints against lawyers have been amended
Court decisions, rulings, special rulings or resolutions submitted by judges to the QDCB on the actions of advocates are not subject to the requirements established for an application (complaint) regarding the advocate's misconduct.
The relevant amendment to Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedure for Receiving and Considering Complaints Regarding Improper Conduct of an Advocate that May Result in Disciplinary Liability was introduced by the Bar Council of Ukraine at its meeting on October 21 (BCU Decision No. 67).
Until recently, judges had to take into account the requirements of the complaint when making a decision on the advocate's behavior. Although the possibility of a judge's response is provided for by the procedural codes, the Law «On the Bar» provides for its own procedure for initiating disciplinary proceedings, an obligatory element of which is the application (complaint).
Thus, according to its Art. 36, anyone who has knowledge of the facts of such behavior has the right to file a statement (complaint) with the Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar regarding the advocate's behavior that may be grounds for disciplinary liability.
The requirements for the application (complaint) are set forth in clause 14 of the said Regulations. Thus, it must contain the following information:
- the name of the qualification and disciplinary commission of the Bar of the region to which the application (complaint) is submitted;
- full name (title) of the applicant (complainant), position, place of work - for an official and an employee, postal address, as well as the number of the means of communication and e-mail address;
- full name of the advocate, whose behavior is the subject of the application (complaint), postal address, as well as the number of the means of communication and e-mail address, if known;
- a statement of the circumstances by which the applicant substantiates the fact of the presence of a disciplinary offense in the advocate's actions;
- requirements of the applicant (complainant).
In support of the circumstances that substantiate the application (complaint), the applicant (complainant) shall provide evidence, and in case of impossibility - shall indicate the evidence, the provision of which is impossible on their own, with the obligatory indication of the reasons and a request to the QDCB to request them.
A copy of the application (complaint) and copies of all documents attached thereto shall be attached to the application (complaint) for delivery to the advocate whose behavior is the subject of the application (complaint), except when the application (complaint) is submitted by e-mail. A written consent to the processing of personal data by the bar self-government bodies, including the collection, storage, use and dissemination, shall also be attached.
At the same time, the application (complaint), executed without observance of these and other requirements of clause 14 of the Regulations, shall be returned to the applicant (complainant) with the relevant explanation.
From now on, according to the amendments, the requirements for an application (complaint) set forth in Article 14 of these Regulations do not apply to court decisions, rulings, individual rulings or binding resolutions filed against the actions of advocates.
It is worth reminding that according to para. 10 of the Regulations, applications (complaints) concerning the advocate's conduct include: applications (complaints) of citizens; decisions, rulings, resolutions, appeals of judges; applications (complaints), resolutions, submissions of investigative bodies; applications (complaints), submissions of the heads of qualification and disciplinary commissions or its members, heads of regional bar councils or its members; applications (complaints) of advocates, law firms, law offices, associations of advocates, enterprises, institutions, organizations and other persons filed against the actions of advocates.
Popular news
Guarantees of the practice of law
Valentin Gvozdiy: Ukraine’s ratification of the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer – is a matter…
Exactly one year ago, on May 13, 2025, in Luxembourg, during the 134th session of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe, the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer was opened for signature. Today, the Verkhovna Rada Committee on legal policy held a working meeting to prepare for its ratification. Between these two dates lies a year, during which (on March 9) Ukraine became the 28th signatory state. We spoke about this new phase with the Vice President of the UNBA, BCU Valentin Gvozdiy, who was personally involved in the preparation of this international instrument.
Support
Mental health, archives and cybersecurity: The UNBA and the IBA reviewed the progress of joint projects
The Ukrainian National Bar Association and the International Bar Association (IBA) reviewed the progress of joint projects that are of practical importance in the context of the war: supporting the mental health of advocates, digitizing archives, and strengthening the cybersecurity of the legal infrastructure.
Rule of Law Roadmap
The UNBA is developing a model for reforming the legal profession
The reform of the advocacy profession is part of the negotiation process regarding Ukraine’s accession to the European Union, and the Rule of Law Roadmap explicitly identifies the Ukrainian National Bar Association as one of the key stakeholders in the process.
Legal defence of military personnel
Missing in action: advocates explain the procedure to the families of servicemembers
As part of the «Advocate+» pilot project, advocates continue to work with military personnel in the brigades, helping to resolve practical legal issues — ranging from social benefits and payments to undergoing medical examinations and processing paperwork.
Guarantees of the practice of law
Police to investigate the NACP's attempts to reform advocacy
The Office of the Prosecutor General has opened a criminal investigation into alleged abuse of power by employees of the National Agency for Corruption Prevention.
Interaction
Advocates and patent attorneys combine their expertise in the field of intellectual property
Joint legislative proposals, expert opinions on regulatory changes and professional discussions on key issues in the field of intellectual property will form the basis of cooperation between the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the National Association of Patent Attorneys of Ukraine.
Interaction
The UNBA and the Council of Judges of Ukraine are expanding their professional dialogue
On April 24, a working meeting was held between the President of the UNBA, BCU Lidiya Izovitova and the Chairman of the Council of Judges of Ukraine Vitaliy Salikhov. Topics discussed included formats for cooperation between bar and judicial self-governing bodies, the development of joint ethical standards, and the formation of a Selection Committee for the recruitment of members of the High Council of Justice.
Legal defence of military personnel
The model for legal assistance to veterans was discussed at the UNBA
A working meeting was held at the Ukrainian National Bar Association, during which representatives of the advocacy profession, the Ministry of Veterans Affairs of Ukraine and a foreign expert discussed approaches to providing legal aid to veterans, the role of the advocacy profession in this system, and the experience of other countries.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates