Requirements for judges' complaints against lawyers have been amended
Court decisions, rulings, special rulings or resolutions submitted by judges to the QDCB on the actions of advocates are not subject to the requirements established for an application (complaint) regarding the advocate's misconduct.
The relevant amendment to Article 10 of the Regulation on the Procedure for Receiving and Considering Complaints Regarding Improper Conduct of an Advocate that May Result in Disciplinary Liability was introduced by the Bar Council of Ukraine at its meeting on October 21 (BCU Decision No. 67).
Until recently, judges had to take into account the requirements of the complaint when making a decision on the advocate's behavior. Although the possibility of a judge's response is provided for by the procedural codes, the Law «On the Bar» provides for its own procedure for initiating disciplinary proceedings, an obligatory element of which is the application (complaint).
Thus, according to its Art. 36, anyone who has knowledge of the facts of such behavior has the right to file a statement (complaint) with the Qualification and Disciplinary Commission of the Bar regarding the advocate's behavior that may be grounds for disciplinary liability.
The requirements for the application (complaint) are set forth in clause 14 of the said Regulations. Thus, it must contain the following information:
- the name of the qualification and disciplinary commission of the Bar of the region to which the application (complaint) is submitted;
- full name (title) of the applicant (complainant), position, place of work - for an official and an employee, postal address, as well as the number of the means of communication and e-mail address;
- full name of the advocate, whose behavior is the subject of the application (complaint), postal address, as well as the number of the means of communication and e-mail address, if known;
- a statement of the circumstances by which the applicant substantiates the fact of the presence of a disciplinary offense in the advocate's actions;
- requirements of the applicant (complainant).
In support of the circumstances that substantiate the application (complaint), the applicant (complainant) shall provide evidence, and in case of impossibility - shall indicate the evidence, the provision of which is impossible on their own, with the obligatory indication of the reasons and a request to the QDCB to request them.
A copy of the application (complaint) and copies of all documents attached thereto shall be attached to the application (complaint) for delivery to the advocate whose behavior is the subject of the application (complaint), except when the application (complaint) is submitted by e-mail. A written consent to the processing of personal data by the bar self-government bodies, including the collection, storage, use and dissemination, shall also be attached.
At the same time, the application (complaint), executed without observance of these and other requirements of clause 14 of the Regulations, shall be returned to the applicant (complainant) with the relevant explanation.
From now on, according to the amendments, the requirements for an application (complaint) set forth in Article 14 of these Regulations do not apply to court decisions, rulings, individual rulings or binding resolutions filed against the actions of advocates.
It is worth reminding that according to para. 10 of the Regulations, applications (complaints) concerning the advocate's conduct include: applications (complaints) of citizens; decisions, rulings, resolutions, appeals of judges; applications (complaints), resolutions, submissions of investigative bodies; applications (complaints), submissions of the heads of qualification and disciplinary commissions or its members, heads of regional bar councils or its members; applications (complaints) of advocates, law firms, law offices, associations of advocates, enterprises, institutions, organizations and other persons filed against the actions of advocates.
Popular news
European integration
The UNBA presented the CCBE with an overview of legal reform and challenges
Reform of the legal profession, Ukraine’s European integration commitments, guarantees of the profession’s independence, and practices of bar self-governance in European countries — these issues were the subject of discussion at the Council of Bars and Law Societies of Europe (CCBE).
Rule of Law Roadmap
The UNBA is compiling the findings of the subgroups regarding the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap
Today, May 28, the Ukrainian National Bar Association hosted a meeting of the Coordination Bureau of the Working Group on the implementation of the Rule of Law Roadmap regarding the reform of the advocacy profession. Following a series of meetings by thematic subgroups, the work is now moving to the stage of consolidating proposals and preparing a coordinated package of recommendations.
Discussion
UNBA discussed removing barriers at border crossings for families with children with disabilities
Families of children with disabilities face additional requirements when traveling abroad, particularly regarding consular registration. What is happening and what changes are needed to remove these obstacles were discussed during the roundtable «Borders without barriers for families of children with disabilities».
Discussion
New rules, old problems: the UNBA discussed the work of the ETAIDF and MMC
The reform of medical-social assessment and military medical commissions has changed procedures but has not resolved practical issues. People face situations where documents are not issued, decisions are based on technicalities, assessments are delayed, and they struggle to demonstrate their actual health status in specific life situations.
Discussion
Co-parenting shouldn't be reduced to a 50/50 formula, — roundtable discussion
Following a divorce, joint custody can serve as a mechanism for ensuring equal parental rights. However, this model requires clear criteria and cannot be applied automatically without taking into account the child’s age, the level of conflict between the parents, the risk of violence, and the feasibility of enforcing the future decision.
Legislation
Penalties for errors in military registration require clear rules, – UNBA
The liability of officials for violations of military registration rules must be legally defined, proportionate, and effectively enforceable. Otherwise, the new fines will not protect citizens from registration errors but will create additional risks.
European integration
Lidiya Izovitova: In the context of European integration reforms, advocacy is a partner of the state, not a target of reform
The war has significantly altered the working conditions for advocates, while European integration has presented the profession with new institutional challenges. The ongoing negotiation process covers issues such as the rule of law, judicial independence, fundamental rights, justice, freedom and security.
Guarantees of the practice of law
The Verkhovna Rada discussed the next steps for ratifying the Convention on the Protection of the Professions of Lawyer
The Verkhovna Rada Committee on legal policy held a working meeting to prepare for the ratification of the Convention for the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer. The meeting was attended by members of parliament, representatives of the Office of the President, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ukrainian National Bar Association.
Publications
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition during wartime: when the risks outweigh the request
Volodymyr Matsko Extradition as a systemic form of rights violations
Victoria Yakusha, Law and Business The anti-corruption vertical cannot «take care» of the Bar as an institution, - acting head of the HQDCB
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates