Appeals against decisions should take into account the interests of all participants – UNBA

When detailing the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code regarding the group of court decisions that may be appealed on appeal, it is necessary to take into account the interests of all participants (parties) in the criminal process.
This was pointed out by the Committee of the Ukrainian National Bar Association on Criminal Law and Procedure following the analysis of Draft Law No. 12139 dated 21.10.2024 «On Amendments to Article 392 of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine regarding the Appeal of Investigating Judge's Decisions».
The document is aimed at improving the provisions of the CPC in terms of the possibility of appealing against rulings obliging the investigator or prosecutor to close criminal proceedings due to the expiration of the pre-trial investigation. To this end, it is proposed to include such rulings in the list of court decisions contained in Article 392 of the CPC.
The UNBA drew attention to the conclusion of the Grand Chamber of the Supreme Court in case No. 237/1459/17 (resolution of 23.05.2018) that if the investigating judge issues a ruling that is not provided for by the criminal procedural rules to which the provisions of Part 3 of Article 309 of the CPC refer, the court of appeal has no right to refuse to verify its legality, referring to the provisions of Part 4 of Article 399 of the CPC. The right to appeal against such a court decision is subject to the provisions of Article 7(1)(17) and Article 24(1) of the CPC, which guarantee it.
Courts of appeal often ignore the right to appeal in order to protect their rights and interests, especially at the stage of pre-trial investigation, when the investigator abuses the right to obtain certain rulings. At the same time, the person in respect of whom the investigating judge's ruling is being enforced is deprived of the right to appeal (re-examine) its legality. In turn, this may create an imbalance in the rights of the participants (parties) to the criminal proceedings and does not comply with the principle of proportionality between the rights and obligations of the pre-trial investigation body and the interested party. This position is also supported by the decision of the Supreme Court of Ukraine in case No. 243/6674/17-k, and the decisions of the Joint Chamber of the Criminal Code of Ukraine in cases No. 569/17036/18 and No. 649/3986/19.
Therefore, despite the need to detail the construction of the provision of the Criminal Procedure Code that defines the group of court decisions that may be appealed on appeal, it is necessary to take into account the interests of all participants (parties) to the criminal proceedings.
Therefore, the proposed amendments to the article do not solve the problem of reviewing court decisions where, in the complainant's opinion, the first instance court did not comply with the principle of legality and guarantees of his/her rights and freedoms. Since there are a number of rulings that are not subject to appeal, which is not consistent with the established practice of the Supreme Court. For example, the decision to cancel the seizure of property in accordance with the CPC is not subject to appeal.
Taking into account the above, the UNBA's specialized committee proposes to supplement part 1 of Article 392 with a new paragraph that will define a group of decisions that may be appealed on appeal, namely: «rulings of the investigating judge that affect the rights, freedoms and interests of any party to the criminal proceedings at the pre-trial investigation stage or another person in respect of whom the ruling was made and that affect his or her rights and legitimate interests».
Such wording, according to the UNBA, will eliminate unequal understanding of the provisions of this article and ensure equal right of appellate review of decisions of the courts of first instance.
Popular news

Advocacy
Another conflict with the TCC: an advocate's leg was broken and his client jumped out of a window
On June 19, at the premises of the military medical commission, where a bus from the Krasnograd Territorial Center for Recruitment and Social Support delivered several people, an incident occurred involving the use of physical force against an advocate.

Advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine appealed to the High Council of Justice due to delays in forming the Competition Commission of t…
On June 13, 2025, Lidiya Izovitova, President of the Bar Council of Ukraine, addressed Grigory Usik, Head of the High Council of Justice, regarding the violation of the deadlines for forming a new composition of the Competition Commission for the selection of members of the High Qualification Commission of Judges of Ukraine.

Advocacy
UNBA calls for compliance with Council of Europe standards for the legal profession
The recently approved roadmap for EU accession in terms of bar reform refers to non-existent European standards and was adopted in violation of international principles. Therefore, before talking about changes, it is necessary to compare the current model of the bar with the Council of Europe standards embodied in the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Lawyer.

Advocacy
Mobilization of advocates in court: UNBA records another case of pressure
The Ukrainian advocacy has once again faced extrajudicial influence on advocates with the aim of obstructing the exercise of their legitimate powers related to the provision of professional legal assistance to clients.

Advocacy
BCU demands verification of authenticity of SSU letter on «dangerous» advocacy
The Bar Council of Ukraine will appeal to the head of the Security Service of Ukraine, Vasyl Malyuk, regarding the verification of information about «negative trends in the legal profession» disseminated by some media outlets on behalf of the SSU.

Advocacy
Council of Europe Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate open for signature
Thirteen member states of the Council of Europe have signed the Convention on the Protection of the Profession of Advocate, which was adopted by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on March 12, 2025. Four more countries will do so today. Ukraine is not among them.

Advocacy
BCU initiates resolution of the issue of visits by advocates to convicted persons
Article 110 of the Criminal Enforcement Code guarantees convicted persons confidentiality of meetings with their advocate. One of the important elements is the possibility to communicate with an advocate in a room without a solid partition. In practice, this provision of the law is systematically violated.

Advocacy
Advocates, academics, and experts examine problems in forensic examination (video)
The Ukrainian National Bar Association, in cooperation with leading scientific and research institutes of forensic expertise, organized a round table on expert support for legal practice.
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…