Lidiya Izovitova: The Law on the Bar is a part of Ukraine's European integration path
The current Law of Ukraine «On the Bar and Practice of Law» is the most modern law on the bar in Europe. Since it embodies European standards of legal profession and self-government, its adoption, among other things, allowed the signing of the Association Agreement with the EU in 2014.
This was emphasized by Lidiya Izovitova, the President of the Ukrainian National Bar Association and the Bar Council of Ukraine, during the International Bar Forum, which is taking place in Kharkiv on December 5-6.
The event is held at the Faculty of Advocacy of the Yaroslav Mudryi National Law University. The UNBA and the Kharkiv Regional Bar Council co-organized the forum.
The President of the UNBA, BCU reminded of the important moments of the formation and development of the modern bar in the context of the European integration path of our country. After all, during the preparation of the draft law, modern European standards for the organization and activities of the Bar, the conclusions of experts from the Council of Europe, the European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission) and proposals of leading Ukrainian scholars were taken into account.
At that time, the need to reform the Bar was driven not only by the need to take certain steps within our country, but also by the need for Ukraine to fulfill its international obligations.
This refers to the PACE Opinion No. 190 (1995) on Ukraine's accession to the Council of Europe of September 26, 1995 (para. 11), PACE Resolution No. 1346 (2003) «Fulfillment by Ukraine of its obligations and commitments» of 29.09.2003 (para. 10), PACE Resolution No. 1755 (2010) «Functioning of democratic institutions in Ukraine» of 04.10.2010. ), PACE Resolution 1755 (2010) on the Functioning of Democratic Institutions in Ukraine of 04.10.2010 (subpara. 7.3.6), which consistently demanded that the status of the legal profession be protected at the legislative level and that a professional bar association be established.
In fulfillment of these obligations, a draft law was prepared that provided for the establishment of the Ukrainian National Bar Association as an independent unified professional organization of lawyers. At the same time, the Venice Commission's opinion emphasized that membership in the UNBA should be mandatory for all Ukrainian lawyers. The Venice Commission did not recommend a dual level of membership, although the system of bar self-government bodies envisaged national and regional bodies.
Among the important provisions implemented in the final text, L. Izovitova mentioned the expansion of the types of advocacy, consolidation of professional rights and guarantees of advocacy, definition of the content of the attorney-client privilege and the legal mechanism for its protection, creation and functioning of the Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine. It also prohibited any influence on the advocate and interference in his or her professional activities.
Therefore, the Law on the Bar and Practice of Law adopted on July 5, 2012, was one of the laws that allowed Ukraine to sign the Association Agreement with the European Union in 2014. After all, it embodied European standards of legal profession and bar self-government, and with its adoption Ukraine fulfilled its international obligations to the Council of Europe.
Subsequently, the constitutional amendments of 2016 (Law No. 1401-VIII «On Amendments to the Constitution of Ukraine on Justice») strengthened the status of the Bar. In particular, it is enshrined that in order to provide professional legal aid in Ukraine, the Bar operates, and its independence is guaranteed. The principles of organization and operation of the Bar and the practice of law in Ukraine are determined by law.
In this regard, the recent Shadow Report to the Justice and Fundamental Rights section of the European Commission's Report on Ukraine, prepared by the Coalition of Civil Society Organizations, looks somewhat strange. It criticizes the situation, effectively nullifying the achievements of all the reforms of the bar.
Therefore, if we assume that the current Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law» does not meet European standards, then it turns out that the 17-year monitoring of Ukraine's fulfillment of its international obligations in the area of the bar, as well as the adoption of the law itself and the subsequent signing of the Association Agreement, is nothing more than a deception of our international partners. Or perhaps European experts did not check Ukraine's fulfillment of its international obligations before signing the Association Agreement? This is hard to imagine, given the attention and time they devoted to the project up to its adoption.
Today, Ukraine is striving to become a member of the European Union as soon as possible. And we are bringing our legislation in line with European standards. And we claim that the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law» has already been reviewed for compliance with European standards. We have a proof - the signing of the Association Agreement.
Then what is the shadow report, for which, as they say, considerable funds were allocated, but which does not provide any meaningful basis for reforming the bar? This is a claim by a group of people that the 2012 bar reform did not take place.
Perhaps it is aimed at destroying Ukraine's achievements in order to prove that it is too early for Ukraine to join the European Union? It is obvious that the document is not professional in its content and in its formulation of the problem. It looks too provocative, as it contains narratives aimed at weakening the institution of the bar.
L. Izovitova also emphasized that any developing institution requires certain legislative improvements. And the Ukrainian Bar is ready for positive changes that are prompted by the life and activities of lawyers and self-governing organizations. But under any circumstances, Ukraine should have a strong bar, which is the first line of defense of human rights in any country where the rule of law is in force.
Popular news
Edition
Advocate or lobbyist? The UNBA has presented a guide to distinguishing between the professions
The Ukrainian National Bar Association has prepared a guide that helps distinguish between the legal status of an advocate and a lobbyist, explains the limits of permissible activities for each, and prevents possible violations of ethical and legal standards when participating in public policy-making.
Announcements
Essay contest on the synergy of human and artificial intelligence in diplomacy has begun
The Educational and Scientific Institute of International Relations at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv invites students from higher education institutions in Ukraine to participate in the Second All-Ukrainian essay competition on the topic «Modern Ukrainian diplomacy: synergy of human and artificial intelligence in defending national interests».
Abroad
Where is the line between respect for the court and the dignity of an advocate?
Ukrainian advocates sometimes complain about condescending attitudes or tactless remarks from judges. But such conflicts are not unique to Ukraine. In various countries, advocates raise issues of communication culture in court, mutual respect, and the inadmissibility of humiliating participants.
Discussion
Occupational safety during wartime: legal risks and employer liability
On October 21, the National Bar Association of Ukraine held a round table discussion on «Occupational safety in conditions of martial law». Participants discussed how the war has changed the requirements for safe working conditions, what guarantees remain for employees, and what responsibility employers bear for violations of legislation in this area.
Abroad
The Czech advocacy has spoken out in defense of the professional independence of its Ukrainian colleagues
The Czech Bar Association (Česká advokátní komora, ČAK) will appeal to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and Ukrainian authorities to ensure the preservation of the independence of advocacy in Ukraine.
Legal defence of military personnel
When agreement is (im)possible: family disputes involving military personnel
The number of family cases involving military personnel is growing, with the most common issues being divorce, division of joint property, alimony, deprivation or contestation of parental rights, adoption, establishment of guardianship, and cases related to domestic violence.
Self-government
Marina Stavniychuk: The UNBA is a professional organization, not a monopoly
A unitary state requires uniform standards for access to the profession and disciplinary responsibility, which is why the Ukrainian National Bar Association acts as a professional organization. Accusations of monopoly are false, because public associations cannot replace professional self-government.
Legislation
UNBA warned about the risks of uncoordinated changes regarding incapacitated persons
The Ukrainian National Bar Association supports the idea of strengthening guarantees for persons declared legally incompetent by a court, but warns against adopting changes that are not coordinated with each other. To ensure real, rather than declarative, protection of rights, a systematic review of the provisions of the Civil Code and the Code of Civil Procedure is necessary.
Publications
Censor.net Protecting advocates – protecting justice: addressing concerns about the new law
Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…
Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE
Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection
Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates
Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine
Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…
Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences