The Supreme Court upheld a lawyer in digitalized reality

Guaranteeing the right to judicial protection and prohibiting its restrictions, especially in the context of digitalization and martial law, requires the court to support various ways of interacting with the parties to the process. This also applies to the methods of signing an order, which cannot be restricted.
The panel of judges of the Administrative Court of Cassation of the Supreme Court issued a decision in case No. 420/35964/23, where the court left the claim without consideration due to improper confirmation of the lawyer's powers. The decision of 12.12.2024 was published in the Unified State Register of Court Decisions.
The statement of claim on behalf of the client was filed through the Electronic Court system. It was signed by the lawyer's digital signature. The application was accompanied by an order for legal aid, which was not generated in the system, but uploaded as a pdf attachment to the application. And in this order, in the column «Lawyer» there was no personal signature.
The court referred to the provisions of Article 26 of the Law «On the Bar and Practice of Law» and clause 12 of the Regulation on the Order for Legal Aid, approved by the decision of the Bar Council of Ukraine No. 41 dated 12.04.2019, and concluded that the absence of one of the mandatory requisites in the order, namely the signature of the lawyer, indicates a procedural defect in the relevant document. In turn, the court concluded, this excludes the possibility of relying on the warrant as a document that properly certifies the lawyer's authority to represent the interests of a person in such a situation.
The Court of Appeal agreed with this position. However, the cassation court noted that the Regulation on the warrant was amended by the decision of the RAU No. 36 dated 08.06.2024. In particular, clause 9 was amended to read as follows: «A warrant issued by an attorney-at-law acting individually shall be signed by the attorney-at-law (in person or with an electronic signature) and certified by the attorney's seal (if any)».
Clause 12 of the Regulation also contains a provision according to which a warrant is considered to be signed by an advocate (head of a law firm/attorneys' office) if the column «Advocate» contains either a handwritten (physical) signature; or the warrant is certified by an electronic signature; or a document to which the warrant is an attachment is certified by an electronic signature.
According to the case file, when applying to the court, the lawyer certified both the statement of claim and the warrant attached to it with his own digital signature. At the same time, the court of first instance first opened the proceedings, but later decided to check whether the person who signed the statement of claim was authorized to do so. And according to the panel of judges of the Supreme Court, the materials available in the case at that time fully provided the court of first instance with the opportunity to identify the person who signed the statement of claim and verify his or her authority to represent.
The high judges also recalled that in similar circumstances, the Court of Cassation in its decision of 06.11. 2024 in case No. 483/346/24 emphasized that guaranteeing everyone the right to judicial protection and prohibiting restrictions on such a right, in particular in the context of intensive digitalization of society, full-scale armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine and the introduction of martial law throughout Ukraine, encourage assistance in ensuring pluralism of ways of interaction between courts and litigants, ways of signing a warrant, and not their restriction by courts.
According to the rules of clause 2, part 1, Article 240 of the Code of Administrative Procedure, the court shall dismiss the claim without consideration if the statement of claim is not signed or is signed by a person who is not authorized to sign it or by a person whose official position is not specified.
Taking into account the above, the CAC concluded that at the time the court of first instance decided to leave the claim without consideration, the court did not have any legal grounds for this for the reasons given by the court of first instance.
On these grounds, the court granted the cassation appeal, overturning the decisions of the lower courts. The case was remanded for further consideration.
Popular news

Advocacy
Beating of a lawyer in Kharkiv: what is known about the incident in the premises of the MME
When the lawyer began to record violations of her client's rights in the premises of the military medical commission, the defender was pushed out of the room by physical force and her belongings were thrown away. The Verkhovna Rada became interested in the incident, and the Ombudsman took the case under his personal control.

Advocacy
The Verkhovna Rada proposes to grant lawyers a deferral from the draft (criteria)
The mobilization of lawyers has devastating consequences for the system of professional legal aid, as it violates the legal rights and interests of hundreds of thousands of citizens and legal entities to whom male lawyers provide professional legal aid.

Advocacy
Exemption from payment of fees in 2025: what advocates should know
The Bar Council of the region and the Ukrainian National Bar Association may, upon the applications of advocates submitted by December 31, decide to exempt, reduce, or defer the payment of the annual fee for the implementation of the bar self-government.

Advocacy
The annual fee of an advocate in 2025: The BCU has changed the distribution
In 2025, the annual contribution to the bar self-government will continue to be one subsistence minimum for able-bodied persons (UAH 3,028, according to the Law on the State Budget). At the same time, its distribution will change.

Advocacy
Officially: there are more than 70 thousand advocates in Ukraine
Recently, the number of advocates in our country has exceeded 70 thousand. To be more precise, as of today, the Unified Register of Advocates of Ukraine contains information about 70152 attorneys.

Advocacy
European integration and advocacy: development of the institution through constructive dialogue
Today, unfortunately, there are many pseudo-experts who are confidently undertaking to reform the institution of the bar. At the same time, they are unwilling to study the issue from the inside and deliberately ignore the disastrous consequences of their initiatives for the country.

Advocacy
Some TCCs have become «territories without advocacy» - Lidiya Izovitova
If the prosecution does not like the position of the lawyer, it resorts to pressure, including through territorial centers for recruitment and social support. Physical pressure, accusations of treason, mobilization - all this can be a reaction of the authorities to an active defense.

Advocacy
Lidiya Izovitova: The Law on the Bar is a part of Ukraine's European integration path
The current Law of Ukraine «On the Bar and Practice of Law» is the most modern law on the bar in Europe. Since it embodies European standards of legal profession and self-government, its adoption, among other things, allowed the signing of the Association Agreement with the EU in 2014.
Publications

Ihor Kolesnykov A BRIEF SUMMARY REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF THE ORDER ON EXTENDED CONFISCATION IN LATVIA REGARDING FINANCIAL ASSETS OF…

Valentyn Gvozdiy WORKING IN A WAR ZONE

Lydia Izovitova Formula of perfection

Sergiy Vylkov Our judicial system is so built that courts do not trust advocates

Iryna Vasylyk Advocacy in the proclamation of Independence of Ukraine

Oleksandr DULSKY When we cross the border of the Supreme Anti-Corruption Court, we get into another department of the National Anti-Corruption…

Vadym Krasnyk The UNBA will work, and all obstacles and restrictions are only temporary inconveniences

Lydia Izovitova Interview with Lydia Izovitova on the occasion of the 8th anniversary of the founding of UNBA: We are the voice of t…